Quick Search

Syndicate

GreaseSpot RSS Feeds

Google Translation

Home arrow Lawsuit Related arrow Ms. Parker Complaint
Ms. Parker Complaint Print E-mail

 

FILED
COMMON PLEAS COURT
00JUN23 AM 9:51
JUDY A. SNODGRASS
SHELBY COUNTY CLERK

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
SHELBY COUNTY, OHIO

Ms. Parker 
c/o Lawrence Levy
14724 Ventura Blvd., 
Suite 520 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 00CV129

Judge

Plaintiff,

COMPLAINT FOR MONEY DAMAGES

vs.

(JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

THE WAY INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
c/o JOHN R. REYNOLDS Stat. Agt.
5555 Wierwille Rd. 
New Knoxville, OH 45871

and

LOY C. MARTINDALE
5555 Wierwille Rd. 
New Knoxville, OH 45871

and 

ROSALIE F. RIVENBARK
9115 New Bremen NK Rd.
New Knoxville, OH 45871

and

JOHN R. REYNOLDS
5555 Wierwille Rd.
New Knoxville, OH 45871

and 
DONALD E. WIERWILLE
5555 Wierwille Rd.
New Knoxville, OH 45871

and

HOWARD R. ALLEN
5555 Wierwille Rd.
New Knoxville, OH 45871

Defendants. 

 

PARTIES

1. Plaintiff, Ms. Parker (fka January Barnes), was recruited at or about the winter of 1978 and thereafter, became an agent and/or employee of The Way International (hereinafter "TWI"). Plaintiff Parker has not disclosed her current address for fear of physical harm or threats from current or former TWI adherents.

2. Defendant TWI, is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in Shelby County, Ohio.

3. At all times pertinent hereto, Defendant LOY C. MARTINDALE ("Martindale"), ROSALIE F. RIVENBARK ("Rivenbark"), JOHN R. REYNOLDS ("Reynolds"), DONALD E. WIERWILLE ("Wierwille"), HOWARD R. ALLEN ("Allen"), (Collectively the - "Way Leadership") are or were officers, directors, employees, agents or trustees of TWI and their acts as described hereinbelow were undertaken and done within the course and scope of their agency for or employment by TWI, and were ratified by, TWI.

BACKGROUND

4. TWI purports to be a religious organization whose actions foster and inculcate a dependent state of mind among its adherents. TWI requests, requires, demands and receives income from its adherents as "contributions" or from direct employment by the adherents on behalf of TWI.

5. The Way Leadership conducts the business of TWI in such a manner that adherents are "conditioned" and/or encouraged to become economically and psychologically dependent on TWI and the Way Leadership. As a result of the foregoing, the Way Leadership occupies positions of trust in relation to adherents of TWI and each member of the Way Leadership owes adherents of TWI a fiduciary duty.

COUNT ONE

(Breach of Contract)

6. Beginning at the inception of her affiliation with TWI. and continuing throughout,

TWI and the Way Leadership represented and promised to Plaintiff Parker that if she adhered to the principles of TWI, participated in Way Corps training for leadership, complied with the directives of the Way Leadership, she would be provided with aid, assistance and specific opportunities so as to become the beneficiary of specific financial and material benefits.

7. In reliance on the representations and promises of TWI and the Way Leadership, Plaintiff abandoned her family, friends and discontinued the pursuit of her secular education, underwent training in the apprentice Way Corps at her own expense, worked as directed by the Way Leadership and TWI both within and outside of TWI so as to be able to continue taking TWI courses, all in pursuit of receiving the "deferred benefits" which she tacitly agreed to defer.

8. Way Leadership tacitly offers a lifelong affiliation to "initiates" with both real and spiritual benefits and said leadership utilizes, what might best be described as "a bait and switch scheme" to promise future opportunities of positions as "leaders" (city, state or regional) which positions include monetary benefits.

9. Plaintiff accepted said offer and devoted almost twenty years of her life adhering to the conditions which would give rise to TWI s obligation to "make good" on their obligation.

10. The Way Leadership and TWI breached their contract with Plaintiff by creating impossible working conditions including, but not limited to, requiring Plaintiff to submit to sexual assault as a condition of continued employment, directly and proximately causing Plaintiff Parker damages.

COUNT TWO

(Breach of a Fiduciary Duty)

11. Plaintiff incorporates and realleges each, every and all of the allegations contained hereinabove as if fully set forth herein and further states that Defendants TWI and the Way Leadership have misused their fiduciary relationship with the Plaintiff so as to cause the failure of Plaintiffs marriage, to coerce Plaintiff into taking obscene photographs of Defendant Rev. Martindale and to posing for similar photographs. Additionally, Defendant Rev. Martindale shared information about other Way women, both single and married, with Plaintiff and shared confidential information about Plaintiff with other Way members.

12. Defendant TWI and the Way Leadership have misused their fiduciary relationship to gain personal and pecuniary benefits at Plaintiff Parker s expense, thereby breaching their fiduciary duty to Plaintiff, subjecting Plaintiff to humiliation and opprobrium for their own personal amusement and gratification. The actions of Defendants show malice and intentional disregard for the rights of Plaintiff Parker and others.

13. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants tortious acts as aforesaid, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount much more than $25,000.00.

COUNT THREE

(Fraud)

14. Plaintiff Parker incorporates and realleges each, every and all of the allegations contained hereinabove as if fully set forth herein and further states that at the time The Way Leadership made the representations and promises concerning future opportunities to Plaintiff Parker, such representations were false and that the Defendants never intended to offer such opportunities to Plaintiff Parker.

15 Such representations were made by the Way Leadership and Martindale solely to keep Plaintiff Parker available to Defendant Martindale for the exploitative sexual relationship which the Way Leadership knew Martindale enjoyed with Plaintiff Parker.

16. Martindale and the Way Leadership also falsely represented to Plaintiff Parker that she owed a duty to serve the physical needs of Defendant Martindale notwithstanding her marriage vows and the teachings of The Way. These false representations were made by Martindale and the Way Leadership while they occupied a position of trust and confidence and were ratified by TWI.

17. In reliance upon these promises as aforesaid and representations concerning her duty, Plaintiff Parker continued to work for TWI, allowed Martindale to continue to exploit her sexually and otherwise continued to benefit TWI and the Way Leadership.

COUNT FOUR

(Unjust Enrichment)

18. Plaintiff Parker incorporates and realleges each, every and all of the allegations contained hereinabove as if fully set forth herein and further states that as a direct and proximate result of her efforts, Defendants TWI, Martindale and Way Leadership have been unjustly enriched in an amount to be determined at trial.

COUNT FIVE

(Civil Conspiracy)

19. Plaintiff incorporates and realleges each, every and all of the allegations contained hereinabove as if fully set forth herein and further states that at all times pertinent hereto, Defendants the Way, and the Way Leadership were acting in concert to achieve an unlawful purpose which would have been impossible for any single Defendant to accomplish alone.

20. Defendants actions were in support and furtherance of this conspiracy.

21. As a result of Defendants conspiracy, Plaintiff has been defrauded of money, and other things of value.

22. Each Defendant knew, or should have known, that his or her wrongful acts were in furtherance of a common purpose and/or conspiracy.

23. As a direct and proximate result of the civil conspiracy accomplished by Defendants, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount much more than $25,000.00.

COUNT SIX

(Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organization)

24. Plaintiff incorporates and realleges each, every and all of the allegations contained hereinabove as if fully set forth herein and further states that at all times pertinent hereto, Defendants The Way was an "enterprise" as defined in Revised Code §2923.31.

25. Defendants TWI, through the Way Leadership engaged in a "Pattern of Corrupt Activity" as defined in Revised Code §2923.3 1; including, but not limited to, acts of theft, fraud, coercion, assault and rape.

26. As a direct and proximate result of the pattern of corrupt activity of Defendant s, Plaintiff has been damaged and injured in an amount much more than $25,000.00.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Ms. Parker demands judgment against Defendants, jointly and individually:

1. in an amount in excess of $25,000;

2. punitive damages

3. her reasonable attorneys fees;

4. and such other and further relief as this Court shall deem just and/or equitable.

JURY DEMAND

Plaintiff demands trial by jury on all issues.

 

OF COUNSEL

 

 

LAWRENCE LEVY
(Cal. Bar. 055845)

 

JAMES E. BURNS (0037330)

Law Offices of Lawrence Levy

 

McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal

14724 Ventura Blvd.

 

& Haiman Co. LPA

Suite 520

 

101 West Prospect Ave.

Sherman Oaks, California 91403

 

Suite 1800

 

 

Cleveland, Ohio 44115