Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Defining WayBrain


doojable
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

And we were even being civil... :)

Defining WayBrain is the topic ,not truth, or belief systems ect.

Yes - but the point was made that WayBrain had the element of arrogance that not only could Truth be known, but that only the twi held the Truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And here I am still posting...... and being civil :biglaugh: Sorry Doogable it is no longer worth the effort It's only a matter of time when the conversation will stray down the line I've been through it already these past days with some Mods. The mission will be protected....... The true household of the cafe will be safe once again. I'll just walk away YOU WIN........ Like Dylan said You can't win with a loosing hand.......

P.S. Way brain - controling speech through intimidation, now that's Way brained........

Edited by WhiteDove
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WD - a civil discussion is refreshing. I don't agree with you, but civil debate invites independent thought.

THAT is not Waybrained. :biglaugh:

Of course, the discussion could stand to move on to other elements of the definition...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Point taken Oakspear.

This:

CULT - Any group which has a pyramid type authoritarian leadership structure with all teaching and guidance coming from the person/persons at the top. The group will claim to be the only way to God; Nirvana; Paradise; Ultimate Reality; Full Potential, Way to Happiness etc, and will use thought reform or mind control techniques to gain control and keep their members. This definition covers cults within all majopr world religions, along with those cults which have no OBVIOUS religious base such as commercial, educational and psychological cults. Others may define these a little differently, but this is the simplest to work from. THE 'ORTHODOX BIBLE-BASED CULT'

A group is called a cult because of their behaviour - not their doctrines. Doctrine is an issue in the area of Apologetics and Heresy. Most religious cults do teach what the Christian church would declare to be heresy but some do not. Some cults teach the basics of the Christian faith but have behavioural patterns that are abusive, controlling and cultic.

is where I got my basic premise about "Truth."

BUT - I failed to address the behavior and not only the belief that they hold all the truth. The control over twi followers is really what should be addressed in the definition of Waybrain.

Edited by doojable
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Point taken Oakspear.

This:

is where I got my basic premise about "Truth."

BUT - I failed to address the behavior and not only the belief that they hold all the truth. The control over twi followers is really what should be addressed in the definition of Waybrain.

Ironically for a group claiming Christianity, the Way missed the boat on how the church often defines truth. Truth is not a "what" but a "who" in many or most Christian circles.

The Way's focus was on "The Word" and not Jesus Christ as truth. We were able to define truth anyway we wanted.

It is really helpful when he "who" is truth is absent, and we take his place.

I think that is how we developed "Way Brain". Instead of worshiping a "Who" we worshiped a "What". Good old fashioned idolatry I guess. A worship of our own crazy theology.

With that thought pattern firmly in place we were open to all kind of control and abuses. I think it just depended how warped you were to begin with and how high up the tree you fell as to how you twisted and used it.

We had our own verbiage to go with our "Way Brain". Our language refected our conditioned thought process.

I still avoid certain sentences. I never ask "What's available?"

Understanding truth as a "who" and the "what" as a means to know the "who" helped me. I didn't have to keep up with the latest "present" convenient insight. Truth remains constant when it is objective. As long as the object is a who.

In my humble opinion, the thing people preach the loudest and longest about they are the most guilty of in their own life. That seems to be what we did with the "Word" the "Word" and nothing but the "Word".

Lockbox, present truth, every third person "possessed" needs&wants, Bless Patrol, advances instead of retreats, no wishing "Luck", "Believing images of Victory", "Absent Christ" Homo purge etc all seem to be uniquely "Way brain" IMHO

Can you imagine an everyday Christian at a ROA without an interpreter?

Edited by Spoudazo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to take a stab at this from some of my observations.

Waybrain is defined by reflexive thoughts and responses to situations based on certain dogmas taught in TWI. What defines them as Waybrain are the catch phrases unique to TWI that are immediately recognized within associates or former associates of TWI as common usage among the associates.

There are many common methods of mind control and signs of group-think that are present among any organization. Usually you see signs when certain phrases are used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Doojbale! I don't post here much anymore, but I'm going to stick my neck out and give my opinion.

I don't really like the term "waybrain" It's used too often on the forums as a club to beat someone over the head when they don't agree with the "popular" opinion. That is not an accusation toward you for bringing the topic up by the way, so please don't think that is what I mean.

There tends to be a mob mentality here at times. When a discussion is going on, and someone has a differing opinion from the "group", they are accused of being "waybrained" and that's pretty much the end of the discussion, that's when mob rule seems to come into play.

But I don't like labels. And that term is used to often to just shut people up if they think differently.

Just my 2 cents, YMMV, and all the other standard disclaimers. :)

Rick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a fair assessment Bluze. I guess in some ways the term is another form of jargon.

I take no offense at your post. As I said, I was reading another thread and the term got bantered about. It occurred to me that perhaps there wasn't a real meaning to that word - just a vague general sense that it wasn't good. If you notice, my first post wasn't all that poignant.

This thread has served to help me define what I mean when I use the term and to understand what others think.

Play on Bluzeman!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's always malicious. Peole tend to be analytical.. myself, I try to figure out what

makes some people tick..

example.

Take a plagiarizing, thieving, abusive, con artist over a little known odd religious organization who also is an alcoholic sex fiend, who is smart enough to surround himself with enough hardened yes men to cover his tracks..

oh, most of this applies to a wider circle than twi. Look at l ron hubbard.. Crowley, and quite a few others.

and a doctrine he promotes for the most part, that DOES NOT WORK. It's a "feel good", mog-serving doctrine, and gives one the sense of "superiority".

the "dead bodies" of the victims slowly are unearthed.. the plagiarism and theft is DOCUMENTED.. and in the face of evidence and eyewitness testimony, some just don't (or can't) get it. They would argue incessantly about the merits of the "new birth", and how the lowlife scumbag was somehow "graced" with the lord's presence..

comparisons are brought forward, to David, to Solomon, to Paul.. that somehow, his existence was justified because of da mighty word o da lord he researched (stole)..

some would ascribe to him the wisdom of Solomon.. the love of David, the spiritual understanding of Paul..

I kind of see the need for some people to generate a label to put on this..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think "waybrain" is the same thing that inflicts the zealots who follow hubbard, crowley, armstrong, TM, Jim Jones, koresh, Simon the Sorcerer, the deluded people who followed the egyptian(?) prophet, referenced in the book of acts, to their destruction.. the followers of Hitler, etc., etc..

I think vic just happened to be another small footnote in this hall of shame..

it's obvioulsy not about any specific belief.

Edited by Ham
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same "brain" even infiltrates a hobby as beneign as amateur radio.

There's one group under a now well aging "charismatic" leader.. it seems to be in decline..

he named his organization, to very closely match the name of the big radio association in america..

many members in his organization think he's some kind of "savior" of radio.. gonna "pull the hobby out of the fire" so to speak..

his adherants would "witness" to other hams at different conventions..

the guy flouts fcc rules and regulations.. and he gets "slapped". Of course, his followers think he's just getting persecuted.. arbitrarily picked on..

when in reality, one has to be REALLY REALLY bad to get that kind of attention from the fcc..

seeing this "brain" in a different context is probably one of the things that helped me relax the mind-numbing grip of twi from my own self..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "Waybrain" label is generally applied to certain attitudes of Way and former way followers. In certain situations, the responses of someone sufferring from "waybrain" can be predicted with fairly good accuracy.

However, "waybrain" (if we can actually define it) would also apply to folks never associated with TWI. You certainly see these behaviours and attitudes outside of TWI and those it influenced.

I like to think of "Waybrain" as a combination of antisocial and narcissistic disorders bought on by acceptance and adherence to a hard set of standards, many times believed to be "immutable truth". These standards or truths could be from religion, science, or elsewhere.

A look at the definitions of sociopath and of narcissitic disorder may help shed some light.

I think "waybrain" is missapplied here some. Yet, I think I know several folks here that probably suffer from it in varying degrees.

Edited by Goey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would also agree that "WayBrain" is a derogatory term.

As is "Wayfer", "Wierwillite", "Moony", or "J-W".

The problem is, it's not the word itself that's so hurtful. It's the fact that it means you are (or were) a member of a REALLY stupid cult. And that's something the individual is just going to have to learn to deal with.

Like it or not, being overly credulous and malleable is NOT a point of pride. Sorry...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really like the term "waybrain" It's used too often on the forums as a club to beat someone over the head when they don't agree with the "popular" opinion. That is not an accusation toward you for bringing the topic up by the way, so please don't think that is what I mean.

There tends to be a mob mentality here at times. When a discussion is going on, and someone has a differing opinion from the "group", they are accused of being "waybrained" and that's pretty much the end of the discussion, that's when mob rule seems to come into play.

I suppose that this could be called "SpotBrain." ("GreaseBrain" sounds really weird.)

George

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I've come to realize it the amount of personal dishonesty that I harbored (and I'm still shedding) during my years in twi.

I noticed it back towards the end of my cult tenure. We knew that if you had a problem with someone you should talk to that person. We knew that gossip was wrong. BUT - it could all be made "all right" if you were trying to get someone to pray for an individual, or if you wanted to "help the person."

Waybrain? Maybe. It was definitely a common occurrence. Maybe it was just sanctioned because it was so easy.

What is it that I've read around here...?

Oh yea...

The lessons we teach are the things we allow.

and...

The lessons repeat until they are learned.

So if for nothing else, I value this discussion and this site. Sometimes it's hard to see what lessons you are teaching and repeating until they are staring you in the face - glaring like brights on a semi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sociopaths aren't called that anymore. Antisocial is the preferred term. :rolleyes:

Preferred by whom? But hey, let's not quibble over terms that mean the same thing.

Actually I used sociopath instead of psycopath to be nice. Same thing though.

VPW amd LCM could be the posterboys for this malady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...