There is SOOOOOOOO much malarkey in Mike's comments on this thread. If he had anything genuine to teach or write, it seems obvious he would have actually developed his thoughts and research before presenting it... instead of telling us he'll get back to us with the scriptures which back up his (thesis?) ideas? Does the expression/idiom "going off half-cocked" mean anything to any of you? I'm not seeing how any one commenting on his half-baked notions will help him or you or anyone