Rocky

WordWolf, that's a fair and reasonable characterization of the situation.

It's NOT about me at all. So stop trying to shame me into doing YOUR dirty work. If you want to take Mark F down. Do so. But don't bug me to do it for you. Pfffttt. YOU are NOT the boss of me. LOL.

It's not ANY about me... or it wouldn't be if you hadn't tried to get me to do YOUR dirty work regarding Mark F.

14 Hours ago, DWBH said,

I'm doing no such thing. And even if I was, you really don't have the right to diagnose me. Because the last time you saw me was five years ago. Stop making this about me.

Thanks, but that wasn't the point.

DWBH is just grinding an ax.

Nonsense. You're in no position to psychoanalyze or to shame me into doing your bidding.

That's a cop-out. AND projection. You've been on my case about it for sometime, trying to tell me what to do. I accept none of your direction related to the matter.

Not interested in your bait. You want to take him down? Figure it out and do it. But by all means, include all of the accomplices, not just the one with whom you happen to have an ax to grind.

Do you? Or are you responsible to specify that a document provided in a pdf file without any verification that it's been filed in court might become a lawsuit but isn't necessarily... and that even if one is filed, it may or may not be verbatim as contained in the unverified pdf file?

Is it really JUST "telling the other side of the story" to not tell the whole story by singling out one particular defendant? AND the linked pdf file does NOT provide any verification that the item has even been filed in court. Hence, this particular one is NOT necessarily a public record.

After all, the could just as easily have rewound the tape and played it over and over. And for those of you who never heard the word "retconned" (like me), Retroactive continuity, or retcon for short,[1][2] is a literary device in which established facts in a fictional work are adjusted, ignored, or contradicted by a subsequently published work which breaks continuity with the former.

If you want to further spell out who is responsible, you might contact the office of Patrick Noaker. You can ask for a case number, whether there has been a jury trial or any settlement talks, whether the complaint as posted at the Spokane Spokesman is active or has been amended at all. With a case number, inquiries can be made of the Pine County District Court. Then again, because Raf covers courts in South Florida, he probably has additional insight.