learning

if you did like the original Dawn of the Dead.. go see Day of the Dead too... same director.

Belle... what you wrote made me shiver...

I ALWAYS NOTICED THAT! I would do some sort of setup for the coffee, milk, sugar, etc.. and the F.C would come by and redo the spoons on the plate so they all faced the same way! It always bothered me!

AARGH! Just do it yr damn self instead of letting someone else be "blessed" by doing it.

wow. Raf, Coolwaters.. you guys are awesome.

I'm actually suprised that some people haven't jumped all over Raf for that statement. W2G!

I read that article today on cnn.com as well.

It makes you wonder. Yes, we would like to think that no one would ever miss that poorly if they were focused..yet if it is THAT easy to miss.. perhaps this school should be moved?

Its for an Advance Class Special

One line near the end sorta goes:

"Way Disciples..and we're living sanctified"

Disciples of the Way? Um.. I thought it was supposed to be JC?

Didn't Harvey play with that Acts group at one time?

Whitedove, ex10,

Thanks for the info again. What u both said makes perfect sense. I suppose this ends the thread, but that is good! Question answered!

:D-->

Was that the Craigie a** kissing book?

I've never seen it myself

Whitedove,

Thank you for the information, if that is all this book was I wonder if it had anything different than the other 2 already released. And if so, why they kept it for themselves? Do you know?

last I heard Terry and Cheryl were not standing

I think I heard that about 3 years bck

I remember hearing about certain books the ministry printed or used that only active WC had access to.

The one I heard about was an orientalisms book that was cheaply bound but went into more detail than the small "Orientalisms of the bible" books.

Substantiate this, or talk about any others, or not ;)-->

I hope my disagreeing didn't read as being upset with Sadie at all, just that it was my experience.

I have to say that what lindyhopper wrote is probably the most accurate:

"knowing the different wacked out things leaders in different areas have said, it wouldn't suprise me"

I had heard time and time again from Way people, (when I would visit other areas like Texas years back or California) "What Way ministry are they a part of?" This was not said in response to comments about the ministry that were disparaging.. (Spelling?) Just about different rules different areas had. No shorts, no hats at picnics, stnad, don't stand, notes, don't take notes in this teaching: all weird things sometimes that seemed area specific but HAD to be followed.

Sorry if this got off track of the original Question. I was just thinking about how in many ways it's hard to seperate our personal experience from the larger whole (if there really is such a thing)

Sadie, currently I'd have to disagree with one point you made:

"Futher more, innies are told to date non-believers for sexual desires instead of the innie girls. This does not fall under the belief system of innie women blessing the men within the cult."

This is not true now, nor (for me) has it been true in the 14 years I have been "in"

Just what I saw.. and I started off in the USA.. rather large area too. Maybe some had different experiences, but I was never told that and never heard that even hinted at.

haha

alfakat and I posted around the same time, disregard mine tonto

haha

Tonto,

Just set up a temporary hotmail or yahoo account. I understand why you don't want to publish your home account address, but prob. neither would Jean post hers? unless she? knows for sure who "Tonto" was.

Just a thought

Why Saint Louis?

5 letters and 2 words

Therefore, 5x2 = established grace.

What other reason do you think Liar needs?'

;)-->

Taking a note from my post about "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" - perhaps THIS is what the research department does! They read GSC!

I really will stop posting about my own posts.

I know this was a slightly old thread, but I had read this myself.

Did anyone in the ministry ever review it? I wonder if they do review books written like this.

Maybe it counts for research for them?

Now, this is not ego. It's also meant as a joke ref. about "Threadkillers", but TELL ME this is not the end? --> ;)-->

Or maybe I wrote the above and filled people with fear. what a bad ol wafer. argh. heh heh

:P-->

Yes, you are so correct. Perhaps I am a little too tired.

Maybe The End will, ultimately be near for this thread? Just hopin I win that jackpot by being the last and final poster.

oh. There isn't one?

adlkjf;lkmcnvoishfdg

Ok, the following IS a joke.

Pawtucket is awesome. Just follow me though.

Imagine they set up an anti-way site, they say nothing to harsh themselves, just let people talk. Total control.

hmm?

I thought Martindale gave it a new name? Maybe I'm not as up on what is going on like I thought.

I did hear that once though, that people could choose to have sex depending on the circumstances.

This would take way too long to get into and I am tired.. I would tend to agree however that current doctrine follows the teachings from Eph that you quoted as well as Eph 6. (See Heb. about how Sara called Abraham lord) etc. They have a new class out on this and related topics now.. haven't taken it.. but of course it would and probably does go over this stuff...any innies seen it?

My personal experience agrees with what Jason P. wrote. I was told, and all others who taught were told too, not to re-teach what was in the Way Mag, STS, or whatever. You could use it as a launching point into a side area or something you were working, but you didn't have to. In fact if someone did just re-hash an article they were talked to afterwords for not putting enough heart into the teaching. And, to clarify, others and myself taught using Youngs, Bullingers, Thayers, WayMag, Humanists, Psychologists, religious texts, dictionaries, etc. You name it, if it was relevant, it was used.

Human understanding does not come from a closed environment.

Really "sucks" that in many ways there are(were) multiple "Way Ministry's" that exist(ed) within itself.

I never did get rid of anything either. Then again I wasn't told to, but I did know those who were "instructed" to in the past.

no censorship, right. Just like when they said not to read these sites. What did they THINK we would do?