Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Linda Z

Members
  • Posts

    3,825
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by Linda Z

  1. GingerDear,

    I tried e-mailing, but it bounced. I must have an old adddress.

    I understand, and my heart's with you. May the good memories fill all the hurting places for you and your daughter. (((Ginger and Miss GT)))

    Love,

    Linda

  2. For someone who's inexperienced with birds, I'd recommend a parakeet. I understand some of them can even say some words & phrases, and they don't bite nearly as hard as parrots and bigger birds. (I can show you some serious scars on my fingers.)

    There are some cute, talkative small parrots, but some of them squawk a lot and make a terrible racket considering their size. Training them takes some experience, IMO, so unless you have an expert bird friend, I'd think twice. And even small parrots/lovebirds, etc. can be expensive.

    Since kids sometimes think they want pets and then grow tired of them, that's another good reason for a parakeet. Then if your little sweetie really takes an active interest he can work up to a more expensive breed next.

    General bird warning, though. They're messy as all get out. Not just in their cages, but all around them. They fling food and seed hulls, bird dander, and sometimes feathers all over the place.

    You sure he doesn't like little chameleons or turtles? icon_smile.gif:)-->

    Good luck!

    Linda

  3. I was at my part-time job at Kroger's (grocery store), standing at my cash register. I was stopped in my tracks--combination of disbelief and sadness. I went to my college classes that night, and my most distinguished, most reserved professor was crying as he told us classes were canceled.

    You're right, Kit. The "mood" of our country was very much like it was on 9/11/2001.

    Linda

  4. Obviously, what the cross represents is more important than a physical depiction of the cross: Jesus' incredible sacrifice, God's unfathomable love, full payment for mankind's sins, and so much, much more.

    I don't care much one way or the other about crosses (i.e., the ones you see on steeples and at fronts of churches and on necklaces). If you want to wear or display 'em, that's fine with me, and if you don't, that's fine too. Not having a cross around never made me stop thinking about how wonderful Jesus was and is or how loving (thanks, Alfa) God was and is.

    Linda Z

  5. WordWolf:

    I get what you're saying. As I said, I wasn't using the little snippet above to imply BGL plagiarized or that VPW didn't. The latter has become obvious to me.

    Nevertheless, I think it is a good idea to stick to the facts (like Raf is doing by comparing various passages of VPW's with those of other writers).

    Linda Z

  6. "In fact all the character names such as Maggie Muggins were 'borrowed' from Leonards class."

    Really?

    "'Maggie Muggins' was the creation of Fredericton-born teacher, writer and storyteller Mary Grannan. In the 1940s, Maggie's imaginary adventures were featured in the popular radio series 'Maggie Muggins.'"

    (Copyright 2002 Canadian Broadcasting Co.)

    I'm not saying or implying that this means BG Leonard plagiarized; nor am I claiming that VPW didn't plagiarize.

    I'm just pointing out a little fact that shows how sorting out all this plagiarizing stuff isn't as simple as it appears at face value.

    Linda Z

  7. Speaking of BG Leonard's class, I had a question earlier that apparently got lost in all the yelling. And since several people have taken his class, I think someone might have the answer.

    How much did he charge (and how much do his successors charge) for his class? I think that's a fair question. Anyone want to answer?

    I went to the Web site but couldn't find how much it costs.

    Now, I can only hope that some of you who think I'm one of them pesky "Wierwille apologists" when I don't squeal with delight and clap my hands when I hear stuff like "he was sent by the devil" or was a "child of the devil" might get where I'm coming from if I try to explain myself in a new way. I have my doubts, but here goes:

    I have not hooked up with CFF, though I know many of them to be wonderful people, because of their dogged adherence to how things were done in twi and by VPW. Believe it or not, there are many things that were taught in PFAL that I never believed, and the list has grown some since I left. Some things I still hold true. It really has nothing to do with where I heard them.

    I also never hooked up with CES because I believe it was founded on pointing fingers at others' sins when some of the pointers were pretty robust sinners too.

    In other words, I'm my own person, with my own mind. I don't want/need another ministry to follow, and I wasn't a very obedient follower the first time around, so why should I?

    If I raise a flag of caution about jumping on BG Leonard's bandwagon, or anyone else's, it's not because I'm defending Victor Paul Wierwille or trying to justify/excuse anything he did wrong in his life. But I feel my point about bandwagons (though I didn't use that word, that WAS my point) was lost in the knee-jerk reaction to what I said.

    The fact that I don't speculate about VPW's eternal destination, that I have not grown to hate him, and that I question whether anyone is qualified to say that he was a counterfeit sent by the devil does not automatically mean I'm an idiot wearing blinders.

    Just because I choose not to talk at length about the wrongs of others doesn't mean I am a "shallow person" (thanks, though, Dot, for your expert assessment of me) or blind or stupid or in denial or any of the other accusations that seem to get thrown around when anyone has a different viewpoint than "it was all evil always."

    I also (in case anyone gives a dammmm about what I really think rather than what you think I think), strongly take issue with Oldiesman's renewed cavalier attitude toward those who have been used and abused. I thought you were past this. What gives?

    And Kit, yes, I'd have been angry too if anyone had stolen my Bible. But that little sweet old man turned lemons into lemonade by the purity of his heart. Period. That was my point in telling that story.

    That dear old man could have stood in church and ranted and raved and cursed the SOB who stole his Bible every Sunday and Wednesday for the next 10 years. But he chose instead to hope the person might get saved. I call that a pure heart of forgiveness. (And before anyone pounces on me for that, here's my forgiveness disclaimer: I figure if I forgive someone, that doesn't let him off God's hook; it just frees my heart for some more enjoyable and useful emotions than hate. I try to keep my own sins to a minimum and let God sort out everyone else's.)

    So anyhow, I was trying to provoke some thought and insert some objectivity. I must not express myself well, because apparently only a handful got it. Oh well, *shrug*, I knew what I meant.

    Linda Z

  8. I'm sorry, dear Excathie, if you've somehow interpreted what I've said as any kind of excusing or ignoring the wrong that was done to you or anyone else. That wasn't my purpose at all. Nothing I said was intended to defend or explain away anything VPW did wrong.

    Goey and Dot:

    Of course we're all free to have our opinions. But when I see someone stating as fact something that there's no way to know, I'm just as free to state my opinion about that, am I not?

    It's one thing to say "VPW was a bad guy. I can tell from his fruit." That's something that can be known for sure. It's totally different to say, "VPW was the counterfeit sent to make sure those that were looking were rendered impotent shortly after finding Christ." That wasn't stated as an opinion ("I think he was the counterfeit...."); it was stated as a fact ("He was the counterfeit....").

    For one thing, many of us found Christ way before we ever heard of VPW or TWI, and no, not everyone was rendered impotent. I know for a fact many, many people who were not.

    I've said repeatedly that's because of the greatness of God, because He can perform wondrous things in spite of what men do. His hands are not tied. It was possible to know God and His Son despite anything that was wrong with twi.

    Linda

  9. Mike, year2027, and Raf, thanks.

    Imablvr, I used to think I didn't mind paying for a Bible class, but my thinking on that has changed. I used to question it sometimes, but then I fell back into line and justified it because I bought into the "Students won't be committed to finishing PFAL if it doesn't cost them something" rap.

    I have no problem with ministries selling tapes or books for what they cost to produce. I do have a problem with them profiting from them. If you want to be an author, fine, be an author. If you want to make money on tapes, then get a band together. But if you want to be a minister, then minister. That's my philosophy today, anyway. It's changed before and it could change again. icon_smile.gif:)-->

    Sorry for the derail. I think I took a wrong turn at the "What CG charges to run his class" thread!

    Linda Z

  10. Dot, thanks for the "sweet heart" compliment, but I think you're missing my point.

    First, the man didn't get robbed. The point was his attitude and reaction, not the woulda coulda shouldas.

    Second, I want to respond to a couple things you said:

    1. "VPW stole the man's lifetime work, then started a ministry to abuse people. So, we got saved and were immediately escourted in to depravity, abuse and oppression."

    I already said that VPW shouldn't have plagiarized in one of my earlier posts in this thread. But I have a few problems with the rest of this. For instance:

    A. You don't know that VPW's purpose for starting a ministry was "to abuse people." No one except God knows what his heart and intent were when he started out. We can criticize what we observed and knew about him, but I think to state your opinion about his purpose as fact is presuming to know what only God can know.

    B. The vast majority of us were certainly not "immediately escorted into depravity, abuse and oppression."

    Immediately? All of us? That's simply not true.

    If only one person was abused (and I certainly know some were), that was way too many, but why exaggerate this? Your words would have much more credibility if you just stuck to the facts.

    2. "VPW was the counterfiet sent to make sure those that were looking were rendered impotent shortly after finding Christ."

    Now this is just out-and-out melodrama. Are you trying to say you know that the Devil sent VPW and you even know why?? Sheesh, Dot. I really avoided spiritualizing in twi. I don't get why you want to do it now.

    I knew many, many people whose lives were not rendered impotent by their involvement in twi but were improved. I've said this over and over: God's hands were not tied by VPW or anyone else. You give the Devil too much credit, IMO.

    Linda Z

    [This message was edited by Linda Z on November 09, 2003 at 8:40.]

  11. Before I went to my first twi fellowship I went for a while to a little church that had a lot of very sweet, loving people in its congregation (despite an obnoxious, hellfire-preaching minister). One day this little old man (he looked about 95) stood up to share something during the Wed. night prayer fellowship.

    He said, "I left my Bible on the front seat of my car while I ran an errand, and someone stole it. They shouldn't have stolen it, but I'm glad they did. I hope they read it and get saved."

    That's how I feel about the VPW plagiarism stuff. He shouldn't have done it, definitely, but if those he stole from were so sure of the deliverance in their messages, I think they should have been happy to have it spread further.

    To me it's sorta like that "I praise God whether Christ be preached in sincerity or out of contention" verse.

    Just a thought.

    Linda

  12. I don't doubt that BG Leonard was a swell guy, but let me ask this: How much were his classes? Did I read right earlier that they were $150 per and that there were about 30 of them?

    If that's the case, I'd say VP copied more from him than material for his books and classes.

    I think it was wrong for VPW to charge money for PFAL (they should have let people donate if they wanted to--really donate, not be forced to pay for a class and call it a donation), and, I think it also was wrong for BG Leonard.

    I've no reason to doubt that BG Leonard was sincere, but I believe if someone has a genuine ministry, he or she doesn't have to charge for ministering and shouldn't.

    Did George Mueller charge the orphans for the food he gave them? Why should anyone charge, then, for the "bread of life"?

    Linda Z

    PS. I have a pretty laissez faire attitude toward the offshoots, but those that are carrying on the twi tradition of taping class after class and charging money for them and expecting people to spend half their lives sitting on their a$$es staring at a tv screen are missing the boat.

    If ya ask me. the sponteneity of really walking with God and serving people where they live instead of expecting them to come to you is a whole lot more exciting!

  13. Kit said, "IMHO halo-witness is what a Christian lives every day, always. It's what we are."

    I agree totally, Kit. Our day-to-day lives are the witness, not some trumped-up activity like cruising the mall. icon_smile.gif:)-->

    "p.s. I always loved getting those tracts. I always loved seeing the hope of them. "

    You must have always looked as sweet as you are. I always got the ones that said I was going to hell. LOL

    Linda Z

  14. Cherished Child:

    Yep, RFR has an image to protect. I'm sure she wants all the remaining Wayfers, who probably haven't had the "privilege" of being around her to learn what she's really like, to buy her syrupy sweet demeanor.

    A lady doesn't muss her skirt or dirty her hands, don't you know? That's what (yes)men are for.

    Linda Z

×
×
  • Create New...