Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

blarney

Members
  • Posts

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

blarney's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. HCW, And Jesus also said we are gods. This is why I take a rather panantheistic (not to be confused with pantheistic) view, rather than God and Jesus being the guy, or guys out there somewhere. Perhaps that is how I can reconcile Jesus being God, yet the son of God, and yet still be somewhat unitarian in my views. My $.02 ~ Blarney
  2. Trust, That's so true. We've become very selfish. When I read your post, I immediately thought about copyrights. There's this idea that these things are "MINE," like you said. Those neatly-package teaching sets involve extra cost. And I've noticed that many include copyright info. I've come to avoid those things. But as long as there's a market, they'll make them. That's why I respect those why offer mp3's and writings on the internet for free. (and some don't ask for donations, even.) You're right, I'd much rather give directly to those with real needs and guard my wallet when it comes to Bible teaching. These are my own personal choices. BTW, I loved the expression, "This is where works and faith meet the road." Blarney
  3. Garth, Wasn't that an adjective? :) Blarney
  4. I feel that one could have a relationship with JC as well as God and still be a unitarian, but perhaps not a biblical unitarian. I think that they elevate the Bible over Jesus or God, which, in my view, is idolatry. I'm not sure if I am in total agreement with either position. I believe that Jesus is one with God, and that he prayed for us to be one with him. I think that Jesus had preexistence with God, but I think that possibly we too had preexistence with him. All in all, I think that there's a lot of good fellowship to be had among trinitarians, but I've also seen a strain among some because there is questioning going on about the word "trinity" not being in the Bible. So, some think that they might have it wrong in some way. Yes, I feel we can talk to either Jesus or God. Still, if one were to be seeking fellowship, I would suggest trinitarians over unitarians, by virtue of the fact that they seem to have a real relationship with Jesus and God. Unitarians seem to have more of an ax to grind, IMO. Sorry for misunderstanding the thread. My best, Blarney
  5. Groucho, I think that is what makes them uniquely unqualified. I have always had the impression that they are only interested in their agenda. For me, personally, not having an agenda is very freeing. I don't feel the need to invite, convince, or pressure. I simply enjoy the moment with people, and if God comes up, fine. If the subject of God doesn't come up, fine. And I think that God is just fine with that. Now that I don't have an agenda, I'm particularly sensitive when people do. It just sounds like noise. My $.02 Blarney
  6. I once said, "Maybe God isn't a trinitarian or a untiarian" to a CES person. They looked at me aghast. I never thought about putting it that way, but we develop so many litmus tests about orthodoxy when we really don't know much of anything. At least I don't. Why must we consider doctrine so important that we can't love? We can see the speck in our brother's or sister's eye but can't see the log in our own. I used to be so arrogant about such things. Such a waste of time and energy... Knowing less and less as time goes by, Blarney
  7. and then there's panantheism -- which integrates both (perhaps?)... I, for one, do not believe that God is a trinitarian or a unitarian. Blarney
  8. Wonderful words, Bagpipes. We each have our own unique cirriculum, have had people point us to the signposts along the path. As spiritual "free agents," we allow Christ to lead us into green pastures, where the nutrients are just right. I like books, books that inspired me to explore the deeper paths of his love. And then I pass them on to those who are interested. For free. To follow someone else -- and letting his/her path become mine -- is denominationalism. His/her path is not mine. And it is false for both of us. I may walk with that person every so briefly, but then I move on, relying on the voice of the shepherd always. As I follow, I discover that doctrines and beliefs fall off, and I become more at one with his love. For the way of the tribal war gods is: "my god or belief is better than yours." And with violence we assert and defend because it is, at times, based on investment, be it time or money. We come together, not in belief, but in his love, encouraging spiritual discernment, which cannot be defined but only intuited through seeking only him. To know only love, which The One is. And this is free. And this beginning to be discerned and manifested throughout his body. Beating swords into plowshares...and resting in his love... And finally, the money will stop flowing and the world will stop groaning, waiting for the manifestation of the sons of God. This is my dream. With love and a holy kiss blowing your way, Roy and All! (Love that tagline) Blarney
  9. blarney

    Guitar Talk

    Kathy, I used to post at Waydale, but found other things to do in the interim (got a degree). Nice meeting you. I really don't have the time to follow many threads here, so I just saw your video and thought I'd send this your way. It's pretty inspiring. I hear he has a record. I'm not sure of the site, though. I agree. It's among the best. Cheers, Blarney
  10. blarney

    Guitar Talk

    Chatty Here's another of "My Guitar Gently Weeps" on a Ukulele. I've never heard one played like this... http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=829401773913198414 My Best, Blarney
  11. Yes, Can it be done without all the hooplah -- the seminars, cds, tapes, books...? Can it arise organically and not in a contrived way? Christ at work within each individual, and each -- led by the spirit -- to love as he loved? The revelation of his love growing stronger and flowing through ... his body? His revelation is love. To the degree in which we are empty of self, he will fill us. Oh yes, the money-changers will chafe, as they chafed at Stephen for insinuating that their institutions will be dismantled. The seminar speakers will have to get a day job, so that he can give to him that needs... Can this be where he leads his church? One thing for sure, leadership will not listen to peons. The money will have to dry up. Institutions continue to be dismantled... Do we want to continue "mantling" them? Just musing over the possiblities... Blarney
  12. Dear All, It, in fact, is as old as the human race, as the prophets, Jesus, Stephen, and Paul attested. You are on the right track, although I would dispense with the middle man, as thousands of believers are beginning to realize...2000 years of being led by men, and we simply haven't seen what Jesus said yet...he will build it.. From the celestial realm, he's calling his sheep, the ones who are still and resting... He will lead, as he promised...the Shepherd. All others are thieves and robbers. They'll insert opinions and call them God's word -- and lead the sheep off the cliff, in a heartbeat. Was it in John where Jesus said, "You search the scriptures, and you think that in them you have eternal life, but they testify of me; but you refuse to come to me." We have our tapes, lexicons, concordances -- all in an effort to come to the truth. But he is truth, the living word. He gives to all freely. Let us save our resources for the poor and needy, our families, and friends. My best, Blarney
  13. Well, I suppose that one would have to support a ministry, if one were in one. I, for one, am forsaking that broken paradigm more and more. But, I pretty much am of the opinion that God is able to teach us himself, and we have no need that any man should teach us. It's the annointing, holy spirit, or whatever you want to call it. He is able to teach us so much more, if we would dare let him. He will lead us to all truth. In my opinion, the "Word" is an eternal ocean of truth, and the Bible is a tiny droplet within it. Blarney
  14. Chas... As a contemplative, I view these manifestations -- as well as all visions and communication with the divine -- as merely "bad translations" (qtd. Thomas Keating) of what cannot be adequately conveyed by the human tongue. Everything gets flitered through the (clouded) prisms of our experiences and and attitudes. So, in that respect, I do think there was something there. But there's always something there of God. He is, and when we're aware of Him simply through being, we allow truth to be infused in us. But this truth eludes communication and is simply "knowing." Thus, I can see how these things can be hit or miss. When we are simply still and know..., we can be more attuned to Love, and that's something that cannot be communicated, necessarily. In our frenetic pace of day to day activity, we miss this. My $.02, Blarney
  15. Guys, Here's a quote by the founder of the Quakers, George Fox, that I thought might be appropriate to this discussion: Seems as thought the Quakers had forgotten what he said... Cheers, Blarney
×
×
  • Create New...