Nathan_Jr
-
Posts
3,100 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
76
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by Nathan_Jr
-
85. Chinqualla Bo Shay
-
84. It teaches that with enough fudging, forced fitting, linguistic acrobatics and exegetical magic tricks, anyone came make the Bible say and mean anything all to fit one's personal, private agenda.
-
83. Extreme closeups of the thief's face in the last session.
-
Sorry if this has already been posted by someone, but when I ate a cookie, I got this revelation for the 2nd time, so it's established according to the cartoon: 82: Buckets and buckets of bullshonta.
-
81. Gloves
-
Also, something about SIT is a prerequisite for revelation. Keys to walking something something. There was a cartoon that proved it. shabba shabba kilimanjaro lo shonta
-
He does?
-
Again, no answer to my questions. As usual. What are you so afraid of? I'll try to ask it another way. An author writes something. In order for the author to understand what he means, he must interpret himself? So the author is doing double work because he couldn't write what he meant, nor understand what he meant the first time? He had to interpret what he meant? Huh? What kind of author does this? One who hasn't slept in weeks because of a meth binge? A paranoid schizophrenic?
-
The phrasing is so awkward, ineffectual. The author interprets what he meant? Why would an author need or want to do this. Doesn't the (skilled) author say what he means? When would one ever interpret what they meant? Your word choice isn't working. Can you rewrite this for clarity?
-
No one needs or wants the priest who rapes. Christ doesn't. The boy with the torn rectum doesn't. Let the priests stop with the child f… king.
-
Does the priest have faith in Christ while raping the child? I'll bet he will assure you that he does. He probably has something to teach you, too. All the teaching. All the raping. All the evil.
-
Sodomitic session sounds like something one might register and make an appointment for. No child signs up for rape. The linguistic acrobatics of rape apologetics are evil.
- 702 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
The questions are rhetorical. Of course, Christ doesn't require ceremony and ritual to do his work. Indeed, his presence is completely substantial. Let all churches dispense with the antiseptic verbiage of rape apologetics. Let them allow Christ to work through them so that they never again commit the linguistic crime that is "sodomitic session." Let the priestly class stop obfuscating and condescending. Let them describe their activities as they are: Rape.
- 702 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
Literally, according to usage, the priest is raping the alter boy. Christ is there? Isn't he absent? Faith? Like believing faith? Or the measure of faith that we have?
-
Not rude at all. Mike is hopelessly spinning on the hamster wheel of PFAL. His spinning is evidence in favor of this thread's proposition - that PFAL sucks.
-
Why?
-
I'd say Lo Shonta to this, but it just wouldn't cover it. This excerpt can stand alone without comment.
-
Ok. Reject it. You do you. Isn't the Bible a collection of writings (literature) written by men (except Hebrews) who were inspired by God? Is this what you are rejecting?
-
Huh??? The author's interpretations of his own writing? Do you mean to use the word meaning everywhere you are using the word interpretation? Hopefully, this hypothetical technical book is written with greater clarity and plainer language than this paragraph. Slow down, Mike. Gather your thoughts, SIT, write a structured outline and begin again.
-
Scripture is a type/genre of literature, within which are sub-genres like apocalypse, poetry, hymns, prophesy, narrative…
-
80. Scripture STILL doesn’t interpret itself. This wonderful kernel was established thousands of years ago. (The 2nd time did it.) Today it was reaffirmed.
-
I rest my case.
-
Is this evidence sufficient? ababababa
-
*figger
-
Does the Bible read itself?
