WordWolf

That is not the name of this movie. (While I am posting, I will also add that it is not the name of the actor in question.)

"Don't rush me- I'm a'thinking. And my head hurts." "Did you ever get the feeling that you was bein' watched?" "Why did you pour ink on my head?" "Now don't try to get away! I am more muscular, more cunning, faster, and larger than you are... and I'm a genius. While you could hardly pass the entrance examinations to kindergarten. So, I'll give you the customary 2 minutes to say your prayers." "I'm sorry, mac, but the lady of the house ain't home and besides we mailed you people a check last week!"

That's a shame, Rudolf. If you had been correct, I would have rewarded you with a spider goulash.

This show had a single episode with Desi Arnaz. Also appearing in the episode was Desi Arnaz Jr. In effect, he played Desi Arnaz in a few scenes. In the same episode, someone else briefly played Louis Armstrong ("Satchmo.") Desi himself played Roy Nitti in at least one scene, and spoke as himself. He also did a poetry reading. Later, he did a musical performance, both singing and with the conga drum. Strictly speaking, Jr did not play Sr on stage, but for most people, it probably worked out the same. He played Ricky Ricardo, in effect pretending he was Desi Sr playing Ricky Ricardo.

No, nothing that recent. Both actors were alive and performed on the same stages before a live audience for the same episode, neither was there through archival footage.

"Don't rush me- I'm a'thinking. And my head hurts." "Did you ever get the feeling that you was bein' watched?"

No.

Famous like in the first 2 categories, as in "we want him to star in our movie" level of stardom, as in "he played a starring role in the following movies" level of stardom. The director found he couldn't refuse this actor a role in the movie because he couldn't pass on the chance for this actor to be in the movie. (Due to the actor's level of stardom and so on, not because of the movie content or format or any other reason.)

This show had a single episode with Desi Arnaz. Also appearing in the episode was Desi Arnaz Jr. In effect, he played Desi Arnaz in a few scenes. In the same episode, someone else briefly played Louis Armstrong ("Satchmo.")

No.

OK, next movie. "You promised we could go and see the hanging." "Be sure it ain't your own." "Carry cash, at this time of night? All those thieves and robbers lurking in dark alleyways? I wouldn't dare."

"It's close to midnight, and something evil's lurking in the dark."

When this movie hit theaters, one famous actor was notably missing from the credits. He wasn't in a starring role or anything, he just wanted to be in the movie. In fact, at first, it was hard to recognize him at all in his role. For the record, the early scripts didn't really have his role, but when the director found out he wanted in on the movie, he (the director) hastily added a scene just so he (the famous actor) could be in it.

This show had a single episode with Desi Arnaz. Also appearing in the episode was Desi Arnaz Jr. In effect, he played Desi Arnaz in a few scenes.

"Don't rush me- I'm a'thinking. And my head hurts."

I've actually sat down to watch one of all of those movies. But I've seen part of a few. If we're talking "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood" and "Barbie", let alone movies with Harley Quinn, we're talking MARGOT ROBBIE.

I think LEONARDO DI CAPRIO was in at least 2 of those.

The first quote could possibly have been "the Honeymooners". Since the second could not be, that makes this show "THE JACKIE GLEASON SHOW", (or "The Jackie Gleason Hour", or whatever it was.)

Taking a swing, but I have to eliminate this one because I keep thinking of it. "AUTOMAN"?????

Oh, "BRIDGE OVER THE RIVER KWAI", featuring "Colonel Bogey's March!"

Taking an educated guess here.... "ANNIE"???

That explains why I couldn't recognize any of the quotes.

Wait, that last part sounds familiar.... Cream's "IN THE WHITE ROOM".

*reads the 9 verses* Even in his own version, it says people will be judged according to their works, and that's all they say. He went from those words to "they'll suffer for some time, and then they'll be annihilated." That was a heck of a jump on his part. It said they would be "judged" (HOW?) and they would be judged "according to their works" (WHAT'S THE CRITERIA, WHAT'S AT STAKE, AND WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE OUTCOMES?) With no other verses, JS inserted his own ideas into the subject. -He footnoted and cross-referenced all sorts of things....but not when it came to that. So, it seems that his ideas were more important than being truthful on this subject. It speaks of vanity. It's the kind of thing that you would expect of a man who would publish his own version of the Bible.

Parables, from what I can see, are each meant to make a single, specific point, in a manner that almost anyone could understand it, and that's it. They are not meant to dissect in fine detail for doctrine- except possibly for the single, specific point. The parable in question is rather pointedly about forgiveness. So, in the parable, the framing story shows a person in prison until a debt is paid. As a basis for doctrine, that's missing the mark (to put it nicely.) Shame on JS if he couldn't just see that immediately, let alone catch it on a later read. As I see it, for him to miss something that obvious means he didn't WANT to see it, and was busy trying to justify something he wanted to see, even if he had to torture the verses to PRETEND that's what they said. Right now, it makes no sense to me for a punishment to be more suffering and THEN annihilation. I'll have to look over the 9 verses and see if, somehow, it makes sense to me afterwards.