
Nathan_Jr
Members-
Posts
3,070 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by Nathan_Jr
-
If You Believed the Way's No-Holocaust Junk
Nathan_Jr replied to ToadFriend's topic in About The Way
I know. I’m a shameless opportunist when it comes to the use of “four crucified stupid.” -
If You Believed the Way's No-Holocaust Junk
Nathan_Jr replied to ToadFriend's topic in About The Way
Not just stupid. Flat Earth stupid. No. Worse. Four crucified stupid - the stupidest. -
Sin and the Need for Perfect Love
Nathan_Jr replied to Charity's topic in Atheism, nontheism, skepticism: Questioning Faith
I can count on you, Waysider. -
Sin and the Need for Perfect Love
Nathan_Jr replied to Charity's topic in Atheism, nontheism, skepticism: Questioning Faith
To see as a child. To see as a child before cultural, political and religious conditioning. To see without judgement. To see without beleef. To see what actually is. So, to see purely, completely, serenely. To see everything with awe and wonder. This is real liberty and power. This is the new birth, again. But it may only come as a glimpse. Don't ask me how. I cannot say and I would not say. It can't be uttered. But we all had it once. (All without exception, or, if you prefer, all without distinction.) This can't happen while clutching, clinging, to dogmas, doctrines, presumptive conclusions and beleefs. -
Sin and the Need for Perfect Love
Nathan_Jr replied to Charity's topic in Atheism, nontheism, skepticism: Questioning Faith
Ok. But isn't something required of you to be saved from the one who loves you? Isn't there something to do first before receiving this saving love? Conditions must be met, lest wrath come down upon thee! -
Sin and the Need for Perfect Love
Nathan_Jr replied to Charity's topic in Atheism, nontheism, skepticism: Questioning Faith
It is not unconditional. The love comes once the conditions are met. I don't think TLC believes it's unconditional. Even poor victor didn't "teach" unconditional love. -
Thanks, Charity, for answering my question. Saved from the wrath. Got it! Were all those passages (without exception or distinction) written to me, or are they merely for my learning? Would you please cite chapter and verse? I'd like to look at the context and examine the Greek from which the phrase "obey the truth" is rendered. Such a curious phrase, obey the truth. I suspect it's an awkward translation or else a figger of speech.
-
No idea, but I suspect it was a tremendous demonstration of desperate clutching and clinging to beleef.
-
What a bittersweet song, Human!
-
"Good fun, good food, good fellowship, and GREAT Word!" Is GREAT Word TWI's answer to Loy's HOT Bible?
-
Well, it depends on which gospel you read. Mark - a young man Matthew - an angel Luke - two men John - two angels For me, these differences are interesting, not problematic, but for inerrantists…well, there’s work to do! Victor paul wierwille would have you cross out the words and verses with the strongest manuscript attestation, perform lexical magic tricks by inventing brand new Greek grammar and definitions, and, ultimately, rewrite it all according to “the original.” And along the way he would conjure figgers of speech where none exist just for the mmmph factor. See, kids? Fits like a palsied hand in a bloody glove. Just tremendous!!
-
Except when it is. One of my favorite pericopes on doubt and belief is John 20: 19-29. Whoever wrote GJohn was writing against the Thomasine community. The author composes this scene intending to make a sound argument for believing without evidence: "Blessed are they who did not see, and yet believed.” But, by my lights, the author of GJohn misses his mark and unintentionally proves the antithesis. Because Thomas doubted, because he investigated, he was the only disciple to touch the incorporeal resurrected body, the only disciple to whom Jesus vouchsafed this knowledge. Thomas saw. What he saw he surely could not unsee. The other disciples merely believed. A powerful, unintended lesson on how doubt and inquiry can lead to astonishing spiritual insight.
-
And Acts 13:34-37. He was raised from the dead, incorruptible, glorified, holy with a life more than abundant. Whatever the life, if Jesus was raised, is he dead? Which is the more valuable life? Which life is more desirable? The one subject to decay or the one that will never decay? What was sacrificed if Jesus is living gloriously and more than abundantly?
-
"..since Jesus is still alive and well, and leading and guiding us in perfect harmony w/ the Holy Spirit.." This is a conventional, even essential, Christian maxim, right? Even the pseudo-Christian charlatan, victor paul wierwille, "taught" Jesus is sitting, alive and well, at the right hand of the Father, right? Albeit, far, FAR away in a distant, inaccessible realm, hence his AND his Father's absence. If he is alive, he didn't die. Not REALLY. And if he didn't die, he wasn't sacrificed. What kind of payment is this if Jesus is still alive? It seems more like he just took a long weekend off. Genuine question: How does this work, theologically?
-
The Epistle of Chris Geer to the Americans: 1989
Nathan_Jr replied to Raf's topic in About the Way in Europe
Thanks for doing this, WW. Looking forward to pages 3 and 4, or else an unbroken hyperlink to the file. Your post is especially timely, as Chris Geer's name has been showing up in my feed lately -- Invoked by survivors and current sycophants alike. -
I’m not convinced the Bible describes an unconditionally loving deity. Certainly, poor little victor and his simp, Loy, didn’t “teach” this kind of deity Yeah, well, see? Here’s a condition: beleeve like me, think like me, get indoctrinated like me, or I’ll shun you. Just pick up a newspaper or open Twitter or watch your favorite talking heads on TV, you’ll see BELEEEF-based division everywhere. The guy who shot the former President yesterday in a display of sad wickedness was motivated in part by BELEEF, just as both his target and his target’s political opponent foment division and destruction by BELEEF. I maintain the source of all division is indoctrinated beleef. I don’t see division as a state of nature, rather, it is the fruit of conditioning. Pay attention to the little children. Do they criticize? Now, who is the more “spiritually mature”? Those who criticize my lack of belief in BELEEF are not my friends. And I lose no sleep. I have lifelong friends who are Protestant, Catholic, Jew, Buddhist, pagan, atheist… None of them try to proselytize me. Though we occasionally discuss esoteric cosmic mysteries, we never debate or argue or criticize. Ever. We find common ground. They love me, and I them, unconditionally.
-
VPW's Motorcycle that we "gifted' to him
Nathan_Jr replied to Junior Corps Surviver's topic in About The Way
Victor lacked the spiritual maturity innate in children. He may have felt threatened by their power. This may explain why he related so poorly to them. Bless his little heart -
VPW's Motorcycle that we "gifted' to him
Nathan_Jr replied to Junior Corps Surviver's topic in About The Way
Mmmph. If only the wierwilles knew how (H-O-W) to get their needs and wants parallel, they wouldn't need to extort their beleevers into buying their toys. Hey! I didn't write the book. -
VPW's Motorcycle that we "gifted' to him
Nathan_Jr replied to Junior Corps Surviver's topic in About The Way
Sweet rig. Why the sidecar? For what purpose was it kept? For whom? Lamsa, T6TMOG? -
In Search of Historic Jesus
Nathan_Jr replied to Raf's topic in Atheism, nontheism, skepticism: Questioning Faith
One possible reason was to bring about the eschaton. Bringing the nations into the fold, grafting them into the vine with Israel, is a necessary step in fulfilling the divine plan, right? Isn't there a passage about this in Isaiah? Maybe I'm misremembering. Paul was certain he knew Gad's timeline (he knew that he knew that he knew), and it was all coming to an end any minute. Except it didn't.