-
Posts
7,357 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
20
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by Oakspear
-
I didn't disagree with Martindale's rationale for doing a new class. True or not, much of PFAL was dated, many of the religious doctrines that Wierwille addressed in PFAL were unlnown to folks in the 90's and 00's. PFAL could have been retaught in a much more exciting and modern format. WayAP didn't do it. It was a collection of pitiful attempts at rebuttals of misunderstandings of scientific theories and religious doctrine (or perhaps deliberate strawmen)
-
Good points in the last post George. I agree that religion often promises the moon, and just doesn't deliver. Then the little follower can't admit that they didn't get the bang for their buck as advertised, so they promote the spirituality du jour as well. While I still have my agnostic card, I do have religious beliefs and experiences, but I'm not setting my sights real high either. Nor am I so convinced about the objective truth of my experiences that I try to convince anyone else. Works just fine for me. I've also given up on the idea that God, or goddess, or the "all" or whatever, is out there making decisions for me. earlier this year, after being passed over for a promotion, I was told "I guess the Universe didn't want you to have that job" - my reply, which has become my credo, was "Well, next time, the universe damned well better ask me!"
-
It was me...I killed him...I killed the all!
-
The original sin of mankind was xeroxing
-
Ah...that makes sense. If it's stupid or "off the Word", we must have been misunderstanding "doctor"
-
It was in 2001 when I left
-
It all goes back to Wierwille and his brother signing over their inheritance to The Way, Incorporated. Whether one thinks that Wierwille had genuine godly motives or was a scam artist from the start, he benefited from and had access to ALL of TWI's assets, without being burdened by propert taxes, income tax, etc. We were so fooled, thinking it was our ministry. Who the h*ll is embarassed by a breach in protocol anyway? :blink: Does this remind you of anything? <_< Is this thread an eye-opener or what?
-
Did Wierwille personally own this golf cart? Or did it belong to The Way International? I'm thinking the latter. It wasn't really "his stuff" then, was it? Martindale learned this lesson well when composing his "loyalty letter" and throughout the nineties. Efforts to change were met with a tyrannical response and an invitation to leave "and don't let the door hit you in the rear" Good question. We all know many people who had good common sense. "Spiritual perception and awareness" implies something beyond what you can perceive with your 5 senses.
-
They "have fellowships serving the Word of God throughout the United States" Apparently no longer in all fifty of those states!
-
I thought that they kept it at 4 years, but changed it to:Candidate Year: Just like the old "apprentice year" Apprentice Year: Required to be a Way Disciple, and then work on staff Two Years "In Residence" :unsure:
-
I wasn't in the Corps, I am depending upon the testimonies of those who were in, and who testify to the difference between what was presented and what was later expected Okay, you do an apprentice year in exchange for future instruction. Makes sense. I think the difference of opinion here involves, not the definition of "lifetime", but the definition of "service". Most Way Corps grads would have been glad to use their training for a lifetime in Christian service running fellowships, teaching, "undershepherding", counselling, etc. Most would have also been glad to accept assignments in "areas of concern, interest and need". The problem is that a desire to define for oneself what that service would constitute, usually got you dropped from the Way Corps.
-
Oh, I don't know, screened a little better. Pulled people off at the first sign of trouble. Gee, practiced some oversight :huh:
-
Yeah, I have a question. Where does it mention giving up the freedom to live wherever you want to, working in the field you were educatted in, bringing up your children as you see fit. Where does it mention the "committment" to provide free labor? Having "A Liftetime of Christian Service" on the cover does not negate the aforementioned promises that it was a "four-year" committment.
-
And anyone who did check whatever stupid thing he was told, and confronted "leadership" about it, was shown the door pretty quickly. I'm aghast that Townsend didn't know Wierwille was promoting it
-
With respect, I believe this distinction is one that any follower of religion would make between his own religion and the religion of others.
-
Because they claimed that the assignments were all by revelation...
-
What exactly were the requirements for entering the Corps? From an outside vantage point, it looked somewhat haphazard, some folks seemed to "have what it took", others semed to just have the money.
-
Sounds like kissing up to the celebrity to me <_<
-
Do we worship a Triune God or NOT?
Oakspear replied to jetc57's topic in Doctrinal: Exploring the Bible
"Discussion" generally involves a bit more than stating that what you believe is truth and everyone who disagrees is an idiot. If you want to get involved in the Doctrinal discussions Allan, do so, but back up what you're saying. The major PFAL supporter on this board believes that PFAL virtually replaces the bible, it would be refreshing to hear the pro-PFAL position discussed rationally. Part of the challenge of having doctrinal discussions is that not everyone starts from the same premise. For instance, two people here may start from the premise that "the bible, as originally written, is god-breathed, and therefore without error" Those two hypothetical people may still disagree on what parts are literal, and what parts are figurative. They may disagree on what language the bible was originally written in, or whose definitions of Greek words they will accept. All of these disagreements can result in different conclusions, even if the basic premise of an inerrant bible is accepted. -
...and they still sell and promote The Rise & Expansion of the Christian Church in the First Century by Martindale, which discusses and promotes numerical expansion.
-
One could be trained as a leader without being shackled to an organization's whims. I can imagine getting the four years of training, and making myself available to be a twig leader, or simply "blessing" my fellowship with my knowledge and experience. It became indentured servitude.
-
Okay then...since there are a few measly Wierwilles still "standing", is the Word living? :blink: This one always got me. He had respect for his family and his background, but all of us were to treat our own families and backgrounds as if they were of no importance. So Wierwille didn't think the guy had humility, so he wouldn't treat him with the respect a federal judge might expect, but he was willing to use the man to prop up his little cult? What went on here? Why did Tony Collins get a WOW pin?
-
Yes, you did. I will now have to tear down the "Galen" shrine that I maintain in my garage. :wub: Naw, actually I just misunderstood your background. I've got no problem with "mail-order" or "internet" ordinations, as long as the holder does not misrepresent himself. To some folks, having a representative of this or that denomination perform a ceremony is very important. To others, it's not as important as the committment to each other, and they just want to observe the legalities.
-
While there were always rumors of deprogramming attempts on Way people, I only knew of two while I was in, and one that I met here at GS. I maybe heard of two or three others mentioned by name during the time I was "in". One was featured prominantly in a Way magazine article, another was the subject of Wierwille's "By The Way" paid editorials. Looking back, TWI would have made a big deal of every unsuccessful deprogramming. So either there wasn't that many attempts, or most of the attempts succeeded in the deprogramees getting out of TWI. Anyway, that's the way it looks to me -_-
-
Does evil exist? Depends on how you want to define "evil", I guess. Is it just the absence of "good", or is it a force in and of itself? Most of what I see that could be interpreted as evil, is mostly selfishness in the extreme. Somebody putting their own needs, wants, and ambitions first, with little or no regard for others.