pjroberge

Oakspear If I had writing at a higher comprehension level, most people (certainly the innies) wouldn't understand it.

I think a minister should be allowed to go back to being a minister if: 1) They have child molester branded in their forehead 2) They are castrated 3) They are un-paid as part of their making amends to society 4) They do community service work cleaning garbage off the roads with a vest that says "Beware of Child molester"

My opinion is that a group is a cult when they in some way acts in a criminal fashion like TWI does.

Wayfer Not! Regarding the popups: Perhaps you picked up some spyware that is generating the popups. Are you running good anti virus software?

Mr. Hammeroni A GS poster has already sent me some of Rosa-lie, but I need to check the legalities of posting any of the BOD's likenesses first.The site is untouchable legally right now due to the First Amendment protection for satire and critical commentary, so it is important to not give TWI any way to mess with the site.

wayferNot I don't know where they are coming from. The website is hosted on my private server.Anyone else getting the popups?

For those of you that may be interested, I have revived Ex-Wayworld Magazine. www.exwayworld.com Its focus is only TWI and their offshoots while Ex-Cultworld Magazine's new owner will expand into many different cults. For those of you that enjoy satiric humor, the Present Spewth website is finally up. www.presentspewth.com I also did a redesign of TWI's website that in my opinion is more truthful. Enjoy

And, the source of this nasty concoction is?

The copy you speak of is not a pdf document. It is html.

Paw, Our condolences on your loss. Your father's passing sounds like it was with the comfort of those that loved him being there. Patrick and Wenda:(-->

The update is as follows: I talked to Bart Mills the news director for Fox and this is a 3 part series concluding tonight with TWI in all 3 segments. I will get a summary put together asap. cudos Doug!

Sorry, but the debate is over. I have a confidential informant that told me different. The lawsuit was only a pretense to get at the websites. Bye

The domain name thewayinternational.com was registered in my name only years before PR Computer Services...Try again?

Raf: Ask yourself: Why did TWI sue PR Computer Services as well as me? Answer: PR Computer Services used to own the server lease for the websites, and the domain names. Duh!! I know the real reason for the lawsuit, but to state it would betray a confidence. I am done arguing with you over this. I know what happened and you are making a sense knowledge evaluation of the situation.

So why did TWI spend so much time building a case against the "infringing" websites ex-cultworld and the path of christ? Thewayinternational.com was not a website, but a re-direct page. And why did TWI file a lawsuit 3 weeks after thewayinternational.com was disabled? And why mention the other websites at all if those websites were not the reason for the lawsuit? Are you that naive to the evil of TWI? You just do not want to believe I may be right, so you continue to dispute what was the real reason. Consider what assets that I have to satisfy a judgement like stock in a magazine I used to own or other assets that TWI wanted. Ask yourself: Why did TWI sue PR Computer Services as well as me? Answer: PR Computer Services used to own the server lease for the websites, and the domain names.You need to think outside of the box of what is really going on versus outside appearances.

Again, TWI could have gone to the domain arbitration board and won their case (if they had one which they didn't) and the board would have had the domain name registrar transfer the domain to TWI. Very quick, efficient, done every day.TWI also never approached me to settle the matter until the Neutral Evaluator session. If the domain name was the only issue, TWI would not have spent so much time showing how the websites were "infringers" or asking for injunctive relief (shut down the websites). In my case, the settlement came after both parties presented their cases and met with the arbitator privately. I did not make an offer to settle. I firmly believed in my case and its merits, and was willing to go to trial if need be to prove the merits of my case. TWI knew I meant business and was not afraid or intimidated by them or their lawyers, and that shocked them I am sure. After all, I am a "cop-out" and supposed greasespot versus the mighty prevailing household... In a very similar case, taubman v. webfeats, the taubman company demanded at the end as part of the penalties/punitive damages that the man's infringing websites be taken down for the infringement. The court ordered the man to take down his websites. Hank who owns webfeats is a computer programmer and represented himself also. He appealed and the higher court's decision is below: "On February 7, 2003, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit found that a "gripe site" devoted to complaints about a shopping center owner was afforded First Amendment protection for its use of trademarks to attract visitors to the website. Taubman Co. v. Webfeats, Nos. 01-2648/2725 (6th Cir. Feb. 7, 2003)."(Cited in 12 other cases) The higher court reversed the lower court's injunction, and Hanks websites are back up and you can read about his case at: www.taubmansucks.com

Nope. Wrong again. You may think you know more about proceedure than I do and you might be right. As far as trademark law however, I spent several hundred hours researching the subject and came to the same conclusions that several trademark attorneys did which I had consulted. And I really don't care how superior your legal knowledge is. I would like to have seen you deal with these guys and see how you would have faired. You probably would have run crying at the first brief they submitted as you seem to believe all the Bull that TWI's lawyers spewed in their pleadings.

TWI is not only into idolatry, but the fruit of this idolatry is the operation of witchcraft within the group by many members.

Wrong again. We presented our legal points in front of the evaluator.I was ready to go to trial, so I did not make the offer. The details of the session I cannot divulge other than what is in the public record. You weren't there. How can you continue to make dum*ss statements as if you know what happened.

My use was the same as the case cited below in that the use of TWI's name to identify information about them:"On February 7, 2003, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit found that a "gripe site" devoted to complaints about a shopping center owner was afforded First Amendment protection for its use of trademarks to attract visitors to the website. Taubman Co. v. Webfeats, Nos. 01-2648/2725 (6th Cir. Feb. 7, 2003)."(Cited in 12 other cases)

Since Long Gone was unwilling to answer these two questions, I will 1) What are the elements of trademark Infringement? A. Someone has a valid trademark for specific goods and services that they sell B. Someone else sells the same goods and services using the trademark holders trademark C. There is enough customer confusion that the infringer's goods and services being sold are passed off as the trademark holder's goods and services Example: The infringer sells blue jeans and puts Levies's trademark on those jeans which infringes on the trademark holder's rights. 2) Why are there laws against trademark infringement? A. To protect the profits of the trademark owner B. To protect the public from purchasing products or services that they thought were from the trademark holder's company but were not. The Judge on my case previously ruled: In HARLAND A. MACIA, III v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 152 F. Supp. 2d 535; 2001, Vermont Federal Court: "... Unless and until Intuit uses the mark in the course of trade, to identify actual goods for sale or transport, it cannot be subject to suit for trademark infringement under § 1125(a). ...because Lanham Act was directed against false representations of goods in interstate commerce, motion to dismiss granted where no sales of goods in commerce took place... The question then is, what goods and services are sold by The Path of Christ or ex-wayworld? Answer: None which means no infringement

Abigail: If a dispute is only about a domain name such as a few posters keep insisting, the proper proceedure would be to bring the dispute to the organization below. The judge would have also insisted on this as it would have been the correct venue to handle the dispute. WIPO's resolution service offers highly qualified neutral panelists, thorough and expeditious administrative procedures, and overall impartiality and credibility. Dispute resolution at WIPO is much faster than normal litigation in the courts. A domain name case filed with WIPO is normally concluded within two months, using on-line procedures, whereas litigation can take much longer. Fees are also much lower than normal litigation. There are no in-person hearings, except in extraordinary cases. Minimal filing requirements also help reduce costs. For resolution of a case involving one to five domain names, with a single panelist, the current cost is US$ 1,500; for three panelists, the total cost is US$ 4,000. For six to ten domain names, the current cost is US$ 2,000 for a case involving a sole panelist and US$ 5,000 for a case involving three panelists. What are the results of the procedures, and are they binding? A domain name is either transferred or the complaint is denied and the respondent keeps the domain name. It is also possible to seek cancellation of the domain name. There are no monetary damages applied in UDRP domain name disputes, and no injunctive relief is available. The accredited domain name registrars - which have agreed to abide by the UDRP - implement a decision after a period of ten days, unless the decision is appealed in court in that time. The panel decisions are mandatory in the sense that accredited registrars are bound to take the necessary steps to enforce a decision, such as transferring the name concerned. However, under the UDRP, either party retains the option to take the dispute to a court of competent jurisdiction for independent resolution. In practice, this is a relatively rare occurrence. http://arbiter.wipo.int/center/faq/domains.html#5 How do you know this? A motion for summary judgement can be filed at any time if its basis is by law. TWI did not have a legal position that current case and statutory law recognized.

Yes and it proudly posted at: www.twisucks.com

Liar. And how would you know what went on? Reading your crystal ball? You make all kinds of wild assumptions about my motives without a shred of evidence. Liar

Long Gone: Could you kindly answer the two questions below: 1) What are the elements of trademark Infringement 2) Why are there laws against trademark infringement No. They were due in a few weeks if TWI hadn't settled.