This is going to be a little difficult for you so maybe get a glass of water and sit down and try to digest.
Building 7 wasn't hit by an airplane...huh? huh? No airplane.
I didn't say anything about the two airliners that did things only maybe possible if they were piloted by a computer. I'm an agnostic about that. You know what that is, agnostic?
And, what's all this about experts? Let's say there weren't lots of experts lined up telling us the official story is a myth, we don't question experts? Hey, if it comes from an expert, must be true.
Oh but wait, that would have to be history's greatest psyop!? It's almost like you were trying to pass the Patriot Act; Install the department of Homeland Security; the TSA? It's like you wanted to invade Afghanistan; Iraq; Syria; Libya; Iran; Somalia...like, everything in A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.
Just sit down with a glass of water and think. COVID? MRNA? Anthony Fauci. Experts...?
You can't go on a guitar players web site and insist on talking about bicycle chains. It's not the place for it. On this site, we don't discuss politics or promote conspiracy theories. We just don't. It's a simple concept.
I am reminded of The Universal Zetetic Society of which E.W. Bullinger was a member. Bullinger was a flat-earther. (Knowing this can aid in understanding why and how an otherwise intelligent, educated man could be so stupid as to assert the easily refuted claim of four crucified.)
You can't go on a guitar players web site and insist on talking about bicycle chains. It's not the place for it. On this site, we don't discuss politics or promote conspiracy theories. We just don't. It's a simple concept.
Alright, initially it was an illustration about how you can try to communicate something you're sure about and still it falls on deaf ears. Next, came this:
"I'd at least respect if you'd just SAY you thought my friend was a liar rather than the cowardly approach of INSINUATING it."
Not really a nice thing to say, especially when it isn't true. But, I'm the bad guy for responding?
I am reminded of The Universal Zetetic Society of which E.W. Bullinger was a member. Bullinger was a flat-earther. (Knowing this can aid in understanding why and how an otherwise intelligent, educated man could be so stupid as to assert the easily refuted claim of four crucified.)
Flat-earthers are a zealous bunch.
Not taking the bait. I certainly wouldn't want to be naughty, here.
I should have been mathematically exact and scientifically precise.
STUPIDITIES and LIES should be disputed and refuted whenever they arise.
No, if you get trucked arguing there is no such thing as a Bilderberg Group, and somebody pulls up their website, somebody may believe their lying eyes.
Flat earth and four crucified and intellectually dishonest and stupid claims. They require lies to overcome the evidence against them. Ultimately, to argue for either will require conspiracy as a premise.
Flat earth and four crucified and intellectually dishonest and stupid claims. They require lies to overcome the evidence against them. Ultimately, to argue for either will require conspiracy as a premise.
Somebody said something about red herrings? Why is it you and only you are talking about flat earth and four crucified?
I don't decide anything at all. I am not and have never been a moderator. The rules are listed on the front page. (Well, they used to be. I haven't checked lately.) Anyway, we don't discuss politics or conspiracy theories, as many of those spill over into the political arena.
Conspiracy theories came up earlier. That reminded me of flat earth, which reminded me of Bullinger, which reminded me of four crucified. An ironic digression to redirect the discussion away from conspiracy theories and politics and back to the stupidity of wierwille.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
20
38
45
96
Popular Days
May 14
48
May 7
33
May 4
32
May 6
24
Top Posters In This Topic
Rocky 20 posts
waysider 38 posts
Nathan_Jr 45 posts
JoyfulSoul 96 posts
Popular Days
May 14 2025
48 posts
May 7 2025
33 posts
May 4 2025
32 posts
May 6 2025
24 posts
Popular Posts
Junior Corps Surviver
Perhaps you are unfamiliar with trauma, PTSD or the sting of being ripped off. I was about to agree with you until you leaned on the cult trope of "crying about decades old offenses". These offenses i
Junior Corps Surviver
The foolish man built his house upon the sand and the rains came down and the floods came up... Glad they were nice to you. They are a poorly researched, mean spirited cult who worshipped a man a
Joe Maslow
For those of you asking. The Way is no longer supporting "tithing", in their STS they talk about "GIVE" and in the last fellowship I participated I was encourage to give freely. So they are not l
Posted Images
waysider
You're crossing the line.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JoyfulSoul
You must have missed when he said I was calling somebody a liar. I'm sorry about...winning.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
That's not what I was responding to.
You can't go on a guitar players web site and insist on talking about bicycle chains. It's not the place for it. On this site, we don't discuss politics or promote conspiracy theories. We just don't. It's a simple concept.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
I am reminded of The Universal Zetetic Society of which E.W. Bullinger was a member. Bullinger was a flat-earther. (Knowing this can aid in understanding why and how an otherwise intelligent, educated man could be so stupid as to assert the easily refuted claim of four crucified.)
Flat-earthers are a zealous bunch.
Edited by Nathan_JrGloves
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JoyfulSoul
Alright, initially it was an illustration about how you can try to communicate something you're sure about and still it falls on deaf ears. Next, came this:
"I'd at least respect if you'd just SAY you thought my friend was a liar rather than the cowardly approach of INSINUATING it."
Not really a nice thing to say, especially when it isn't true. But, I'm the bad guy for responding?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JoyfulSoul
Not taking the bait. I certainly wouldn't want to be naughty, here.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
It's not bait. Flat Earth is a conspiracy theory. Seems on topic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JoyfulSoul
Careful. Waysider isn't having it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Waysider is right. Bullinger was wrong.
Both of those statements are true and easily proven.
Edited by Nathan_JrLink to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Of course you can respond.
Do it in a way that doesn't involve politics or conspiracy theories.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JoyfulSoul
I'm telling you, if you keep up about conspiracy theories, then...well, I don't know then but it's probably not good.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Right. Conspiracy theories are not good.
The stupidity of conspiracy theories like four crucified and flat earth should be disputed and refuted whenever they arise.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JoyfulSoul
Watch, you're going to time out, now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
I would say the "whenever" part is where discretion becomes a consideration.
Edited by waysiderspelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
I should have been mathematically exact and scientifically precise.
STUPIDITIES and LIES should be disputed and refuted whenever they arise.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
But only if they fit like a hand in an oven mitt.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JoyfulSoul
No, if you get trucked arguing there is no such thing as a Bilderberg Group, and somebody pulls up their website, somebody may believe their lying eyes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
I didn't say anything about a Bilderberg Group. Another red herring.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Four crucified and flat earth are the stupid pieces of bread holding together the bullsh¡t sandwich.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JoyfulSoul
By bad. Waysider determines who can talk about conspiracy theories and you decide what the conspiracy theories are. Glad we have rules.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Flat earth and four crucified and intellectually dishonest and stupid claims. They require lies to overcome the evidence against them. Ultimately, to argue for either will require conspiracy as a premise.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JoyfulSoul
Somebody said something about red herrings? Why is it you and only you are talking about flat earth and four crucified?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
I don't decide anything at all. I am not and have never been a moderator. The rules are listed on the front page. (Well, they used to be. I haven't checked lately.) Anyway, we don't discuss politics or conspiracy theories, as many of those spill over into the political arena.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Conspiracy theories came up earlier. That reminded me of flat earth, which reminded me of Bullinger, which reminded me of four crucified. An ironic digression to redirect the discussion away from conspiracy theories and politics and back to the stupidity of wierwille.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.