This just beats all I've ever heard. In this day and age there is just no reason to have to abort a baby. Birth control is the politically correct thing to do these days. There's really no need for unwanted pregnancies to occur anymore with the exception of rape.
If she had been raped I might see it differently, but with so many people wanting to adopt, why not have the babies and let someone raise them that wants them.
If I were the judge, I would throw her case out, saying shame on you and I'd order an immediate total hysterectomy. That woman is no Momma! Life's tough enough without adding all that unnecessary rejection and sadness.
How can a 9 or 10 year old possibly survive the knowledge that their very life is a total accident, that their own mommy destroyed their twin and it's just an accident that they're ALIVE?
I happen to have a 9 year old daughter. That statement alone (that she'll tell the kid at that age) tells me that woman needs to be removed from that precious child's life.
Yeah Shell, this one and that one that put that precious baby in the dryer to die that horrific death ought to be put together, away somewhere that they not only can't have any more babies, but can't harm anymore either.
I'm having a hard time swallowing this one in so many ways. If she didn't want the baby, why did she keep her?
And an "elective c-section"??? What the hell is that? I thought c-sections were only "elective" if one had previously had a c-section and was pregnant again. Then, depending on circumstances they could choose to try to go natural or have a repeat c-section. Who chooses to go under the knife????
And where is her responsibility in getting pregnant in the first place? and the father's too?
yeah, it does sound like the doctor's screwed up. and IF she had given the child up for adoption and sued for the medical costs of the birth and/or pain and suffering, etc. I might understand. But she CHOSE to keep her daughter.
I really despise a parent who would tell a child they should have aborted them.
Adoption is always an avenue and there are plenty of couples waiting on long lists to adopt.
The doctors in this case sound like morons just as well as the mother. But, the mother made the decision to keep the baby so she should shut up an love her and take care of her. If she wanted the child to truly have a better life she would have given her up for adoption and could have even assisted in finding her daughter a great home.
And an "elective c-section"??? What the hell is that? I thought c-sections were only "elective" if one had previously had a c-section and was pregnant again. Then, depending on circumstances they could choose to try to go natural or have a repeat c-section. Who chooses to go under the knife????
An elective c-section is when it's decided to deliver by c-section before labor begins...for whatever reasons.
Most of the time, an elective section is for a second birth where Dr's don't believe the once cut uterus will withstand the pressures of delivery and birth.
But in this case, I believe they decided to do this because they did not know enough about the structures remaining internally. It was probably safer to do this than risk normal labor and birth since the abortion occurred fairly shortly before the other twin was born.
today at four,the state should take the baby away and find a home that is honest and loving.
She thinks the dr. who messed up the abortion owes her ?
she owes that kid the right to a life without this on her head and heart.
What can she say "oh I was young and stupid and made a mistake?
ok even if the kid can handle that with the death of her twin, mom has made it even worse by still not accepting responsibility for this child by asking the dr. to pay for her .
so give the witch the money for the botched abortion and take the baby away and tell her live with her own dam self and leave those who survive her alone.
"'I have got a child now that I wasn't planning to have and I believe the hospital should take some responsibility for that,' she said.
Wow!! True words from a complete moron! I hope her parents have enough cajones to stand up and take care of the little one. There's no way she should explain to that child that she didn't want her. It will scar her for life.
That biyatch is just looking for some money. I wish I were on that jury.....
Recommended Posts
Shellon
"Miss Dow said she thought long and hard before deciding to pursue the legal claim because of the potential impact it would have on her daughter"
I have to wonder how much thought she's given to the impact that her daughter knowing she never wanted her will have.
What a maroon. Put her with the mama that put her baby in the dryer. Neither should be mama's.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bowtwi
This just beats all I've ever heard. In this day and age there is just no reason to have to abort a baby. Birth control is the politically correct thing to do these days. There's really no need for unwanted pregnancies to occur anymore with the exception of rape.
If she had been raped I might see it differently, but with so many people wanting to adopt, why not have the babies and let someone raise them that wants them.
If I were the judge, I would throw her case out, saying shame on you and I'd order an immediate total hysterectomy. That woman is no Momma! Life's tough enough without adding all that unnecessary rejection and sadness.
How can a 9 or 10 year old possibly survive the knowledge that their very life is a total accident, that their own mommy destroyed their twin and it's just an accident that they're ALIVE?
I happen to have a 9 year old daughter. That statement alone (that she'll tell the kid at that age) tells me that woman needs to be removed from that precious child's life.
Yeah Shell, this one and that one that put that precious baby in the dryer to die that horrific death ought to be put together, away somewhere that they not only can't have any more babies, but can't harm anymore either.
Edited by bowtwiLink to comment
Share on other sites
coolchef1248 @adelphia.net
that stupid bit***********h
if she didn't want the child what about putting it up for adoption to some loveing parents who wouldn't moan and complain about #############
it seems like a $$$$$ scam to me
into the dryer with her!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Morgan
I'm having a hard time swallowing this one in so many ways. If she didn't want the baby, why did she keep her?
And an "elective c-section"??? What the hell is that? I thought c-sections were only "elective" if one had previously had a c-section and was pregnant again. Then, depending on circumstances they could choose to try to go natural or have a repeat c-section. Who chooses to go under the knife????
And where is her responsibility in getting pregnant in the first place? and the father's too?
yeah, it does sound like the doctor's screwed up. and IF she had given the child up for adoption and sued for the medical costs of the birth and/or pain and suffering, etc. I might understand. But she CHOSE to keep her daughter.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Digitalis
I really despise a parent who would tell a child they should have aborted them.
Adoption is always an avenue and there are plenty of couples waiting on long lists to adopt.
The doctors in this case sound like morons just as well as the mother. But, the mother made the decision to keep the baby so she should shut up an love her and take care of her. If she wanted the child to truly have a better life she would have given her up for adoption and could have even assisted in finding her daughter a great home.
Digi
Link to comment
Share on other sites
krys
An elective c-section is when it's decided to deliver by c-section before labor begins...for whatever reasons.
Most of the time, an elective section is for a second birth where Dr's don't believe the once cut uterus will withstand the pressures of delivery and birth.
But in this case, I believe they decided to do this because they did not know enough about the structures remaining internally. It was probably safer to do this than risk normal labor and birth since the abortion occurred fairly shortly before the other twin was born.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pond
she should have given the baby up for adoption.
today at four,the state should take the baby away and find a home that is honest and loving.
She thinks the dr. who messed up the abortion owes her ?
she owes that kid the right to a life without this on her head and heart.
What can she say "oh I was young and stupid and made a mistake?
ok even if the kid can handle that with the death of her twin, mom has made it even worse by still not accepting responsibility for this child by asking the dr. to pay for her .
so give the witch the money for the botched abortion and take the baby away and tell her live with her own dam self and leave those who survive her alone.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nottawayfer
"'I have got a child now that I wasn't planning to have and I believe the hospital should take some responsibility for that,' she said.
Wow!! True words from a complete moron! I hope her parents have enough cajones to stand up and take care of the little one. There's no way she should explain to that child that she didn't want her. It will scar her for life.
That biyatch is just looking for some money. I wish I were on that jury.....
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.