nyunknown

Here is a solution for the parrot in monty python. A Pakistani Dalek! Anyone wants any curry!

Even benny hill got into the act with Dr.who. anyone wants to star a benny hill topic?

Does it say more about the congessman or the people who elected him?

Sounds like they should be married to each other.

Great I did not see "battlefeild earth" either from what I hear it was a real stinkaroo. Oh BTY got some inside info from the ex-scientology board. ! We all agreed that this is what would have happen if L.ron hubbard wrote this for" revenge of the sith". It a riot! !

Here is a link you might find interesting! http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/movies/penned_the_suckiest_movie_ever_sorry_MdXedZpTMWJmfpw80Xc7aO

I am suprized anyone would have bid for it. On the other hand mabey its rosie is so desperate for cash she set the whole thing up to make it look like its worth something when it worth less than crap.

Well why I am here. To find the truth, and I apply the quote From the book written by Master Sun Tzu. The supreme art of war is not how many battles you are in, but to win the war without fighting.

The law was actually to put a limit on "blood feud", the only justice there was in pre-legal societies. It means, "If somebody puts your eye out, that's the worst thing you can do back to them. You can't kill 'em. You can't chop their hands off. If somebody knocks ONE of your teeth out, all you can do to get back at them is knock ONE of their teeth out. You can't knock out two. I agree with you. You see you proved my point. I bet if you asked anyone here that question here how many diffrent answers would you get?

Well I am glad in a way I helped with the monty python topic. I am glad I inspired here. I should respond to gandalf anyway. LOL. A lot of holy sciptures can be interpreted in many diffrent ways. For example "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth". How can one interpet that phrase? Does it mean you literally mean you take an eye out or a tooth out if some does that to you? Can it also mean revenge. Can it mean justice? Or can it mean I don't like the way you look. I'll kill you how many other ways can that phrase can it be interpeted? What is the truth behind that phrase? What can one misinterpet that phrase. What do you want it to mean?

Whats the prize?

I hope the moderators and anyone else here does not mind me being passionate about this. I am unique in a way. I was a victum of two cults. I got involved in sciectology in 1986 to 1988. This was before the age of the internet fully took place, when I was involved in the ny org, all this stuff about zemu or zenu was not know to an average scientologist. only the upper magagement knew this stuff. One thing I can tell you for sure is L.R. hubbard back in 1967" created this OT3 "level one day he knew he was going to pass away he was going to leave it to david mayo. David M. staged a coop and won. Now because of the internet scientology is now being show for what it is. I have a lot of inside information if anyone here want to know I will be glad to answer it here in an open fourm or in privite.

Humm is that simon and what his name garfunkel?

That cool waysider!

This was written in L.Ron Hubbards own hand writting! Founded Jan. 19, 1997, by David S. Touretzky (dst@cs.cmu.edu) This page is based on this page. Q: Why can't Lisa McPherson read this page? A: Because she's dead. Our sympathy to her family, and the families of all Scientology victims. <BR clear=all> Space Opera as Theology: Scientology's OT III This page is dedicated to the analysis and criticism of what Scientologists must consider to be the most significant document in the history of the human race: L. Ron Hubbard's "OT III". (See legal notes below.) The first page of this historic work, jotted down in Hubbard's own hand, is presented herewith: Transcript: Data (1) (1) The head of the Galactic Confederation (76 planets around larger stars visible from here) (founded 95,000,000 yrs ago, very space opera) solved overpopulation (250 billion or so per planet) -- 178 billion average) by mass implanting. He caused people to be brought to Teegeeack (Earth) and put an H Bomb on the principal volcanoes (Incident 2) and then the Pacific area ones were taken in boxes to Hawaii and the Atlantic Area ones to Las Palmas and there "packaged." His name was Xenu. He used renegades. Various misleading data by means of circuits etc. were placed in the implants. When through with his crime Loyal Officers (to the people) captured him after 6 years of battle and put him in an electronic mountain trap where he still is. "They" are gone. The place (Confed.) has since been a desert. How do you know this was actually written by L. Ron Hubbard? The document was authenticated by Helena Kobrin, lawyer for Religious Technology Center, in a letter sent to Carnegie Mellon's legal counsel on January 24, 1997. Her assistance is much appreciated. Do Scientologists really believe this stuff? Yes, they do. This essay by Bob Minton describes the Scientology world-view that emerges from OT III. What comes after OT III? After OT III comes NOTs, or NED for OTs (New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans), which covers levels OT IV through OT VII. More body thetan stuff. You can learn about NOTs at the NOTs Scholars Home Page. Was Xenu a drug-inspired hallucination, or a rip-off from Gurdijeff?? Prignillius contributed this interesting posting concerning how Hubbard's drug use may have contributed to OT III. A reader writes to inform us that "... the body thetans idea is similiar to Gurdjieff's `Organ Kundabuffer': an organ supposedly implanted (long ago) in human bodies in order to twist their perception of reality. The whole of Gurdjieff's work was aimed to destroy the consequences of this Organ (as repeated many times in his Beelzebub's Tales to his Grandson book)." Commentary Funny that there is no date on this page. Hubbard dated everything. Two later pages of the 20 page handwritten manuscript bear the date October 28, 1968, but the first three pages have no date. Was he too spaced out when he wrote this to remember such details? Why did he write (1) twice at the top of the first page? The penmanship in this document is poor. Hubbard switches between cursive and printed styles seemingly at random. Notice the "b" in "billion" is printed the first time and cursive the second. And reader Jeff Lee points out that "[Hubbard's] punctuation is atrocious. He also shows some inconsistency in dotting his i's and crossing his t's." He underlines three words, presumably for emphasis: the word "then", and the place names Hawaii and Las Palmas. It's hard for a lay reader to see why emphasis is needed here. However, location is very important in Scientology auditing: they believe it necessary to "date/locate" an incident in order to properly identify it and "blow the charge" from the engram. Hubbard's definition of "truth" is the exact time, place, form, and event. Hence, location is emphasized here because this information will be needed later to identify which implant station the person (thetan) was taken to. Note that Teegeeack and Earth are not underlined. Hubbard writes "volcanoes" where my preferred spelling (and the one used in Wakefield's book and the Fishman Declaration) is "volcanos". However, the version of OT III in Scamizdat #5 has "volcanoes". Dictionaries list both spellings. Equally acceptable spellings are listed in alphabetical order, so "volcanoes" appears first, but it is not marked as the preferred form. Most of the volcanos cited in the "data" section of OT III (later in the document) did not exist 75 million years ago. See the list here Hubbard capitalizes "H Bomb" where the convention (at least now) is "H-bomb". Note that Hubbard uses the correct spelling of "principal". He does not appear to be a bad speller. (It would be impossible to check this by looking at printed Scientology literature, since his output was checked and edited by underlings before publication.) Note the reference to "Incident 2". In both the Fishman Declaration and Wakefield versions of OT III this is transcribed as "Incident II", i.e., using roman numerals, and this convention is also followed in the Vorlon edition of the FLAG NOTs pack. Martin Ottman's transcription says "Incident 2". In Hubbard's original document, arabic numbers or the words "One" and "Two" are used, but never roman numerals. The heavy use of parenthetical interjections gives the page the tone of a verbal report, but examining the actual document shows that a couple of these were inserted later, so this cannot be a verbatim transcript. The first one, "(founded 95,000,000 yrs ago, very space opera)", appears to be an insert because it uses smaller letters and smaller inter-line spacing than the rest of the text. The second one is "(Confed.)", which clarifies the meaning of "place". This is expanded to "(Confederation)" in the typeset versions of OT III I've seen, such as Wakefield's (cited below.) On the RJ-67 tape (Ron's Journal #67), Hubbard uses "Confederacy" rather than "Confederation". Two other insertions are noteworthy. The "with his crime" phrase, the only interjection not parenthesized, indicates that it was Xenu who was "through", rather than the implanting of an individual reaching completion. And the "(to the people)" comment clarifies that the officers were loyal to Xenu's victims, not Xenu. The visual appearance of this comment shows that it could not have been inserted later. On the other hand, it is ungrammatical, suggesting that Hubbard realized the ambiguity at the moment he finished the preceding line, and stuck in the parenthetical comment to resolve it. Attorney Douglas M. Johnson suggests (see bottom of page) that the word I've transcribed as "loyal" may actually be "Royal". The document has a telegraphic style in places, suggesting it was scribbled down in haste. One example is the abbreviation "yrs" in the first parenthetical comment. (All the typeset versions of OT III I've seen expand this to "years".) Another example is the ungrammatical "(to the people)" insertion. On pages 2-3 Hubbard suggests he may be the only person in 75,000,000 years to have discovered the implant and lived to tell about it. The raw, breathless tone of this document, and the fact that it is still presented to Scientologists in its original handwritten form, heighten the reader's sense of being there with Hubbard in 1967 when he emerges "very knocked out but alive" to scribble down his momentous discovery. It's hard to see how a galactic confederation could become a "desert" except in a highly metaphorical sense. What happened to all the folks who defeated Xenu's renegades? Is Xenu, still locked in his mountain trap, the lone survivor of his race? Logical contradiction: how can there be 250 billion "or so" per planet if the average number was 178 billion? The Xenu/Xemu Controversy This page contains one of the few appearances of the word "Xenu" in print in the Scientology scriptures. (To the best of my knowledge, this is the only occurrence in Hubbard's own handwriting.) I've heard that there was an OT III teacher's manual that contained "Xemu" in print, and in at least one case the word was crossed out and "Xenu" was handwritten in, but I have not been able to confirm this. The ex-Scientologists I've personally spoken with say "Xenu" is the more commonly used form. There is reference to the OT III story in the RJ-67 tape cited by Kendrick Moxon in his deposition of Jeff Jacobsen (see below). Moxon says "Xenu" in the deposition, but Xenu himself is not mentioned on that tape. Why did Warren McShane say "Xemu" rather than "Xenu" in his testimony in the FACTNet case in Colorado? (Transcript below.) This may be a transcription error, since Robert Vaughn Young, a former high-level Scientologist turned critic who also testified that day, is shown using the same pronunciation. RTC lawyer Helena Kobrin has been known to block out the word "Xenu" in some of her legal correspondence, so perhaps saying "Xemu" is a Scientologist's way of avoiding pronunciation of the real word. It's clear from the document image that Hubbard really did write "Xenu" and not "Xemu". And two people who knew Hubbard have told me that the name is definitely "Xenu", although one recalled that there was one place where "Xemu" was used. Presumably that was the Class VIII Assists tape. There are several spoken mentions of "Xemu" on the Class VIII Assists tape. A partial transcript of this tape appeared in Scamizdat #5. Sound clips are available here in several formats: WAV, PCM, or RealAudio files. (You can download a free RealAudio player by clicking here.) In the first excerpt Hubbard appears unsure about the name: xemu0.wav , xemu0.ram, xemu0.pcm: And they had elected a fellow by the name of Xenu, ahhh, could be spelled X-E-M-U, to the supreme "rulah", and they were about to unelect him. And he took the last moments he had in office to really "goof the floof." Aren't thetans supposed to have perfect recall of all their memories? How come Hubbard can't remember whether the biggest villain in galactic history is named Xenu or Xemu? Wouldn't such a thing be indelibly burned into his menal image pictures of his life as a space alien? The remaining four instances on the tape are all "Xemu": xemu1.wav, xemu1.ram: "Xemu missed." xemu2.wav, xemu2.ram: "which Xemu had brought in" xemu3.wav, xemu3.ram: "so on, the administrators that had been loyal to Xemu were" xemu4.wav, xemu4.ram: "Xemu was put with several of his cohorts in the center of a mountain" So, if the transcript is accurate, Hubbard himself was unclear whether the name was Xenu or Xemu. His associates insist that he always said "Xenu", and in this tape he does start out with "Xenu", but then he continues with "Xemu".

Here is another link from someone who was involved in scientology!

You are right its getting too siily here! MY BRAIN HURTS!

MY BRAIN HURTS!

Waterbuffalo please show this to your friend and or anyone else who is thinking about joining the "billion year club"! I hope this helps!

Waterbufflao I decided to post here. I am concerned. This is a link about david miscavage that midget dicator. I am not concerned about silly stuff about 2012 or monty python ect. I am concerned about anyone thinking about joining scientology. My advise is DON'T DO IT! DON'T DO IT! I acutally talked someone out of joining! Take That that David M! http://www.whoisdavidmiscavige.com/

Well I have to say george. But I am a generious guy you all win!

Too silly? What standards of sillyness do you want? You want landminds?

You mean like this?

Ok no problem. I jusy wanted to see if it worked.

Pardon me for not getting back here sooner. Anonymous is a member of the ex-scientology member board like I am. Dave M. The dicator of scientology considers anon the number 1 foe. They plan to change the courses and more massive protests are planned all across the world. Its not in the news yet. But you will all hear it soon.