So_crates
-
Posts
2,271 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
23
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by So_crates
-
Yet, you said, you paid 100 skins for the so-called new, improved PLAF class. -
Actually I used the contemporary idiom on a different object. The logic should still hold, as a train being on time for a person would be the same as God being on time for a person. Claiming a one time event is you attempting to torture language and adds nothing to you claim that God is always on time suggests a budget. How does it suggest a budget? And you're slightly in error, God does more than one time unique interventions, he may have to do the same intervention multiple times. Like forgiving Saint Vic for his sexual preditory activities.
-
The 3:10 from Yuma is always on time. How does that suggest a budget?
-
Double doors and budgets! Whatever happened to God is always on time?
-
Of course it's about money. Those board meetings in the Bahamas aren't cheap. Come home folks to the new and improved PLAF class (no red curtains and more bs added) and, we know we promised you grads can take the class as many times as you want, but we'll let you sit in on this one for the poultry sum of $100.
-
Like I said, believing equals recieving. As Saint Vic says in the class, I don't care to hear the details of the birth, show me the baby. I want to see the baby!
-
No, just wondering why you even bother preaching if you don't want to give a testimonial. Your gotcha excuse not only shows your believing, but shows how dumb you think your audience is.
- 1,462 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- dark persuasion
- delusion
- (and 10 more)
-
Save me the bull. You're trying to tell me testimonies don't help anyone. If you had fruit in your life you'd be bragging it up to the rafters.
-
Believing equals recieving, Mike.
-
Here's wild idea: why don't YOU become meek and I'll tell you about all the fruit in my life since I stopped making PLAF the center of my life. Oh, wait, I'm already doing that.
-
In other words, you got nothing.
- 1,462 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- dark persuasion
- delusion
- (and 10 more)
-
You claim there's fruit in your life. Once again you use the abstract (like all that supposed good Saint Vic was supposed to do). How about some specifics? Considering you claim we have piddly replacements, I would assume you have oodles of examples of fruit in your life.
-
**Points over Mike's head** Look, Mike, there goes the point. I think what they're getting at is that you keep blaming the Corps for being the Corps, failing to realize the Corps is Saint Vic.
-
Yah, Mike, the guy who insisted on being called "Doctor" didn't want to get any of the credit, so he skipped being graded. Now tell me the one with the three bears.
- 1,462 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- dark persuasion
- delusion
- (and 10 more)
-
I think this goes back to the teacher of the class. Once again, communication was his responsibility and it's not our job to guess what he means. Especially, when he's using archaic terms no one understands but him. Parallel, indeed.
-
In other words, Mike has squat. Actually, he wishes he had squat.
-
No I haven't. In all the reposts and proof I posted to prove to you that the ministry taught material abundance, just where did I say they taught greed? It's actually you backpedaling because you can't admit you were wrong. Right. The only person that was allowed greedy opulence was Saint Vic. I wouldn't care if you were angry with me. As for your read only audience, if they're still with you after blaming the woman for Saint Vic raping her (Saint Vic's level of temptation was high) then that says a lot about them, doesn't it?
-
Again, this whole discussion was prefaced with TO RECEIVE ANYTHING FROM GOD in the class. I thought you said the class didn't teach material abundance. Also, it's Saint Vic spreading this TVT and it's in the collaterals.
-
This is one of those statements made to sound like heavy revie, but when you unpack it you realize it means nothing. Define wants. Define needs. How are they balanced? How do you know when they're balanced? Poof! The whole sentence vanishes into thin air. This is one of those TVTs in the collaterals we were talking about in the above post. No, it means a sexual predator tried to pull a fast one and got caught at it. Besides I thought you've wasted how many pages of bandwidth claiming the ministry and the class didn't teach material abundance and yet here it is another example of how to get anything from God. I thought God only met our needs. So this statement is a none issue. There is no need to consider whether wants and needs are balanced, just default to needs. Save your typing if it was unclear 30 years ago it'll be just as unclear now. Really!? I would suspect a lack of desire to communicate, as you're responsible for your communication and it's not our job to guess what you mean.
-
Ever feminist in your read only audience should be giving you a talking to. Your blaming the women for what happened to them. Oh,you claim, the woman's level of temptation was too high. (Blame the victim. It wasn't his fault. It was them. They were too tempting.)
-
Again you make excuses for evil behavior. You: Oh we have to excuse Saint Vic using roofies on woman, his temptation was so great.
-
And you know what level of temptation I've been subject to ...how?
-
No, not like me. I never broke the law, at least seriously, basically parking violations. So my level of sin was nowhere near his. But it did happen in the class and collaterals, as Waysider has been pointing out to you. As I've been pointing out to you. You just refuse to see it.
-
What do old jokes cause?
-
And once again, a lot of those TVTs came from the mouth of Saint Vic himself.