Steve!

Ma~ - the subject isn't hands, it's mouths.

In the interest of returning this thread to its original purpose - Okay, fine, whatever, I misrepresented you.

Sharon - Phil (oldiesman) has said on more than one occasion that he *would* return to TWI if there were a twig within convenient distance of him. He is more pro-TWI than half the innies out there, and that's saying something. He sings only 2 songs - one of them is "my time with TWI was all sun and roses", and the other is "you women always claim to be the victims".

Hmmmm, I'm detecting subtle innuendos there, Matilda - something you are well known for.

Before.

Once again, the Roman Catholic church is causing problems with royal marriage plans. Isn't that why the Church of England exists?

Subic Bay? Bangkok? They would probably leave with more than they came in with. So, Jonny Lingo - are two of your 10 wives named Connie and Annie?

No, he was not. He was not worldly famous whatsoever. I'm not even sure if he did gigs with bands in bars.

So my exclamation point is obnoxious, is it? You want obnoxious, I've got your obnoxious right here! So you don't like my attitude, well, too bad so sad sucks to be you! ;)-->

Another thing about the desertion claim - If a guy's been out at sea for a month, the wife, in filing for divorce, can claim desertion, EVEN IF DESERTION IS QUALIFIED AS BEING 18 MONTHS - the woman only needs to say that the husband has been gone for 18 months. How's the guy going to dispute that?

He helped to inspire and support Lech Walesa and his Solidarnosc! movement.

That means please check your private topics. Click on "Go", "My space", "Private messaging"

That gap is rapidly closing, in fact if you were to compare actual years of experience in the same job, that gap is virtually non-existent. And the only reason there is an apparent gap any more at all is because of the off-again on-again nature of women that have children. Let's say that Joe and Mary both get hired for the same job in 1990. Joe and Mary both get reviews every January. Mary takes off 6 months in 1995 to have a child, then again in 1997 to have a child, then again in 1999, then again in 2001. It's now 2005. They both have 15 years experience, right? Wrong! Joe has 15 years, Mary has 13 years. Should Mary have gotten exactly the same raises every year as Joe? No! If Joe had taken 4 sabbaticals of 6 months each and Mary had not taken time off for children, Mary would have gotten 2 years worth of raises that Joe did not. Yes, I do know that here and there are examples of *actual* rather than perceived disparity. But that kind of gap is now illegal. So when you take into account the amount of time taken for child bearing, and figure that in, poof! all of a sudden the gap disappears. Again, that's when comparing apples to apples. If you say that women in general make less than men in general, I would tend to agree - but that's because of the nature of the jobs held. Women with children, especially in urban areas, tend to have less education than men, and therefore end up in lower paying professions. When you look at the numbers on a job-by-job basis, and figure in *actual* experience, the gap is a myth.

Yup, that's where the "corollary" manifestations were practiced - Kissing in Tongues Interpretation of Dreams Gifted Hands

I don't know if it's a novelty, but it IS entertaining!

Um, I was kidding about Rocky . . . Gladiator?

Rocky?

Beetlejuice Michael Keaton Mr. Mom

Well, duh! You two are probably the LAST to know that you would be getting married! And of course I echo all the other sentiments posted here - I'm absolutely happy for you!

bad steve

Well, the only thing better than roses on your piano is tulips on your organ.

Galen, you didn't read that right. What socks said was that "if folks were listening to PFAL, they'd know that once born again, ya can't die spiritually" was one of the clearest points taught.

Oh, om, but they *did* and *do* have a fiduciary responsibility! The fiduciary responsibility of a religious organization is that it stewards the money wisely and uses it in a fashion that will support that religious organization, and will benefit the community(ies) that it serves. By this definition, TWIt has been in violation for a LOOOOONG time.

And Bob, next time the potato should go in front!

In a bikini holding a pina colada! Ick, I don't think I want to see a pic of Bob in a bikini, whether or not he's holding a pina colada!