Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Goey

Members
  • Posts

    1,862
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Goey

  1. To the best of my understanding, Camp Gunnison Inc. is a completely separate NPC from The Way International Inc. So this financial statement would not account for the holdings and assets of Gunnison Inc. The only thing Camp Gunnison Inc. and The Way Internalional Inc share in common is that Rosalie Rivenbark serves as president of both of these corporations. Camp Gunnison Inc Also consider that there is over 10 mllion dollars in shares and deposits in The Way Credit Union, which is probably booty from ABS. The Way Credit Union Cheers
  2. TWI Financial Statement - 2007 The 2008 statement will be available soon. I will post it as soon as possible. It may be interesting to compare. Cheers
  3. Jesus said: " Which of you shall have an A$$ or an ox fallen into a pit, and ill not straightway pull him out on the sabbath day?" It seems pretty clear to me that a TWI leader's need for having their lawn mowed or having their a house cleaned on the sabbath ..... is the same thing as having YOUR A$$ fall in a pit. So it stands to reason that mowing a TWI leader's lawn or cleaning a TWI leader's house on the sabbath is the same as pulling YOUR A$$ out of a pit. And no one wants their A$$ in a pit on the sabbath ... do they ? Hmmmm ? Innies ........Best get mowing and cleaning.
  4. I disassociatie quite a bit lately. But prefer to call it an afternoon nap. On a serious note ......... "Cause and effect have not been "proven." But I've dealt with over 2000 current and former cult members. When the same symptoms come up over and over, it's reasonable to hypothesize there's a connection." How can you hypothesize such a connection unless the 2000 current and former cult members are compared to 2000 non cult members? My guess is that if you compared the 2000 culties in counseling, with for example, 2000 movie actors in counseling, or even any 2000 persons that are in counseling of some kind ..... that the incident of debilitatiing dissassociation might be similar in all groups. But ....... if you took all those from each group that experience dibilitatating disassociation and found a higher incident of cult participation in those folks than in the ones who did not experience debilitatiing disassociation , THEN ...... it might be reasonable to hypothesize a connection. But maybe the connection could simply be that they are all just in counseling ...... But hey, what do I know ?
  5. Preferred by whom? But hey, let's not quibble over terms that mean the same thing. Actually I used sociopath instead of psycopath to be nice. Same thing though. VPW amd LCM could be the posterboys for this malady.
  6. The "Waybrain" label is generally applied to certain attitudes of Way and former way followers. In certain situations, the responses of someone sufferring from "waybrain" can be predicted with fairly good accuracy. However, "waybrain" (if we can actually define it) would also apply to folks never associated with TWI. You certainly see these behaviours and attitudes outside of TWI and those it influenced. I like to think of "Waybrain" as a combination of antisocial and narcissistic disorders bought on by acceptance and adherence to a hard set of standards, many times believed to be "immutable truth". These standards or truths could be from religion, science, or elsewhere. A look at the definitions of sociopath and of narcissitic disorder may help shed some light. I think "waybrain" is missapplied here some. Yet, I think I know several folks here that probably suffer from it in varying degrees.
  7. Ok, heres my humble contribution ........ Sang to the melody of "Clementine" In an Cornfield. In Ohio We're still standing on the Word Live is great here. Fruit abounding Don't believe the things you've heard Chorus Serve with Gladness Serve with Gladness Serve with Gladness everyday Holy Household live forever In the land we call the Way ----------------------------------------------- Ok now. Certainly y'all can add some more verses.
  8. Wow, how exciting. Since the Lord is "absent" he can't really be served directly. In this day and age, to serve the Lord is really to serve "The Ministry." So what this really means is to Serve the Ministry with Gladness. Stop complaining about having nothing to offer new folks. Stop asking silly questions about money and old lawsuits and stuff. Shut the hell up and be glad that Rosie (et al) are there taking care of the spiritual things for you. Be glad that Rosie and gang are there to take your abundant sharing and use it for the "Lord's Work". (Feeding the poor and all the other wonderful things they do for folks.) Shut the hell up, send more money, and be glad that you belong to the true household !
  9. The "Law of Believing" as taught in PFAL is a non-Biblical teaching and can be quite destructive. The Bible does mention a "law of faith" in Romans 3: but it has nothing to do with the PFAL's name it and claim it nonsense. Here it is in context : A natural reading of this section in Romans shows that the biblical "law of faith" has to do with redemption and justifcation through faith in Jesus Christ as opposed to doing works of the Law ( of Moses) The real law of believing (faith) has nothing to do with fire-engine red drapes and the best parking spots at the mall. PFAL took a few scriptures out of their context then errantly inferred and tried to establish some kind of "imutable spiritual law" that "works for saint and sinner alike" . Christian or non-Christian , just claim it (if it's available) and believe, and presto chango... it's yours!. Of course, you have to "know what to do with it after you receive it " (non scriptural) and "have your needs and wants parallel" (also "non scriptural) .... and then there's the pop in and out of fellowship crap ........ yada yada yada. Aside from the saint and sinner contridiction, (a sinner/non-Christian wouldn't use the name of Jesus Christ), VPW put in the loopholes so his so-called "law of believing could remain a "law" without being questioned. Got a cold? .... Where's your believing ? Had a car wreck? .... No faith. Didn't get what your prayed for? ..... Certainly something you did wrong ..... cause it couldn't possibly be that VPW's law of believing is wrong and not a "law" at all. Why? -- Because the great Wierweille declared it ( by fiat) to be an IMUTABLE SPIRITUAL LAW ................ Baaaaaaahhhhh ! .
  10. Repeat after me. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. There's no such thing as coersive sexual abuse. .... Ad nauseum
  11. Gunnison has always been a Not For Profit Corporation, legally separate from TWI. As a NFP Corporation it belongs to no one. TWI Inc has never "owned" Gunnison Inc. Gunnison Inc. has its own charter, by laws and Board of Directors. However the Board of Directors at times have been the same on both Corporations. It is legally impossible for a board member to gain ownnership of a Not for Profit Corporation unless they purchase it at market value. For Gunnison that would be about 15 million or so. Craig was removed from the board of Gunnison when he was removed from the board TWI . He does not now , nor has he ever owned Gunison. Who ever suggested that was mistaken.
  12. Goey Posted to Oldiesman Oldiesman replied: It's only a loaded question because you cannot answer it intelligently and in a manner consistant with generally accepted morals - or in a manner that does not contradict other things you have said. Your inability & refusal to answer was expected.
  13. Ok, so you disagree with Wierweille here and acknowledge that they "had no responsibility whatever". So that makes VPW what? ..... A false accuser. He falsely accused these folks of the death of Gary Duhoff and falsely accused John Nave of "murder." It seems you agree here. But we can hardly say that VPW had "no responsibility whatever " in the case of Sandra Sullivan. Of course I do not subscribe to VPW's standard of responsibility and neither do you as you have made clear. However, if we use VPW's standard as the bar, he convicts himself of murder in the case of Sandra Sullivan. One difference in these two tragedys is that in the case of Sandra Sulivan, the accused, VPW, was directly involved in a way that probably influenced the outcome. Then why are you not equally unsupportive anhd unsympathetic of VPW's adulteries and abuses considering the effect they had on people? You make no sense Oldiesman. None at all.
  14. The death of this woman was certainly tragic. It amazes me how anyone could deny any resposibility on the part of VPW. From Karl Kahler's Book. The aboove refers to the death of Gary Dunhoff who died as a result of a car accident while he was out "cheating" on the colon cleanse by eating some cookies. Wierwille held anyone who cheated on, or even knew about any cheating on the notorious colon cleanse "directly responsible for Gary Duhoff's death". So we have Wiwerwille, who cheated on his wife (adultry) while taking sexual advantage of a member of his flock, and as a result of of this, the woman commits suicide. Yet somehow, according to Oldiesman, Wiereille bears no responsibility. Oldiesman, in light of the above, please explain how and why Wierweille can hold these folks "directly responsible" for the death of Gary Dunhoff, and yet somehow not himself be directly responsible for the death of Sandra Sullivan. I await your reply.
  15. Recently Translated from the Estranged Aramaic 1: Now, the beginning of PFAL was on this wise. 2: In the beginning was the Word and the Word was [became] without form and void [lost] and darkness was upon the face of the earth. 3: And Gawd, seeing the broken cisterns of theology and the plight of the world that was being destroyed for a lack of knowledge, had compassion upon man. 4: So Gawd went to and fro and searched all four corners of the earth for a man spiritual enough and humble enough to learn the lost Word and to be Gawd's spokesman to the world. 5: But He could find no one but Victor, a defrocked ( for fraking his secretary) Ohio preacher. 6: And Victor, being the only man spiritual enough and humble enough to be taught the revealed Word like it had not [never?] been known since the first century needed a sign or he was going to chuck the whole mess. 7: So Gawd made it snow on the holy gas pumps as a sign to Victor that He would teach him the Word if Victor would agree to teach it to others [especially young, naive, sexually active pot-smoking hippie kids]. 8: And Victor, after throwing out all his books except for a few tattered remnants, wrote PFAL as Gawd [and Bullinger, Stiles, Leonard, et al] taught him 9: And Victor began teaching PFAL, [ while fraking his flock] and the Word became known like had not [never?] been know since the first century. 10: And the light began to shine once again. 11: Thus was the beginning of PFAL.
  16. While I give little doctrinal weight to the writings of the RC saints, I think that what Mark posted is signicifant in that it shows that some people in the Western Church had at least a general/cursory understanding of some of the things that VP claimed hadn't been known since the first century. I also find Church history and tradition somewhat facinating for the simple reason that it can help us understand how and why many Christian doctrines were developed - and how many have evolved -- from the time of the apostles through both the RCC and Eastern Orthodox Church's into Proterstantism and now in to modern Evangelic & Pentecostal Christianity -- and other current movements such as the now popular and growing "prophetic movement and even stuff like "Jews For Jesus".
  17. Goey

    Poker Anyone ?

    Rick, Your friend probably is playing for real money. Many of the poker sites have real money tables, from 1 cent to $200 blinds. Some tables have thousands of dollars on them. However, most of the sites also have play money tables and play money tournaments. All you can win with these is more play money and bragging rights. A lot of folks meet up and play on the same table as kind of a social thing, since there is also a chat window where you can shoot the bull. I NEVER ver play for real money. Don't have any anyway.
  18. Goey

    Poker Anyone ?

    I play on Pokerstars.com. I have found this to be the best and most reliable online poker site. Never a problem. The account is completey free. Play is completely free. When you start you get 2,000 chips as a stake, and you build from there. To play, download the free client software from pokerstars.com . I play as "Goeytex". See ya there.
  19. Goey

    Poker Anyone ?

    I have been playing Poker ( Texas Hold'em) on the Internet for several years now. Getting pretty good at it. I play with folks from all over the world. Only for "play" chips, but sometimes the competion is very intense. Any other Poker players out there ?
  20. Hi Jafin, Welcome to Greasespot, What a good post. The questions you asked are some of the main ones that many of us have asked ourselves (and others) after once being followers of the teachings of TWI. No one can really answer these questions for you and I am not suggesting that anyone that has responded is trying to do that. What I mean is, you will have to take the time and expend the effort to seek the answers for yourself. As you can see by the responses so far, many of us have found quite a bit that was taught in PFAL/TWI to be doctrinally wrong (to one degree or another). But we don't all agree. If we did, it would be kind of scary IMO. The process of sorting through all of the questions and getting some answers is not instantanious and can be very challenging. It can be very uncomfortable to question a belief system that has been ingrained into us for a good part of our lives. It can be even more uncomfortable to realize/admit that some, if not lots of it, was wrong or even harmful ....and to change. ( like the man with the bicycle with crooked handle bars) Probably all of the things you mentioned have been discused here "Doctrinal" in detail. I suggest you read these archived discussions, not necessarily to get the answers, but more to get an idea of how folks went about getting the answers for themselves. For me, a natural reading of the Bible, (void of commentaries, margin notes , word studies and preconcieved ideas) opened up a lot of things and helped answer a lot of questions. When I came upon a verse or section that one of TWI doctrines hung on, not presuming TWI to be either right or wrong, I prayed for understanding and asked if that is what it really meant. If it was something from PFAL, I looked to see if VPW actually used the "keys" that he taught. Many times I found that he did not especially in regards to context. But most important, IMO, is to allow God/ holy spirit to guide you and to be an integtral part of the learning / relearning process. The answers will come in time. Glad you're here.
  21. It was obviously a "parable" set forth by the teacher. As with most parables, the characters are fictional and the true meaning is hidden to the spiritually ignorant until the meaning of the parable is revealed. The mother represents ______________. The child represents _______________. The mothers unbelief represents ______________ . The death of the child represents _____________. And the moral of the story is _________________________________________________ . Fill in the blanks
  22. Good point. It runs in my family as well, on my father's side. But, it doesn't matter if they eat steak and potatoes, are vegans, or if they smoke or not. About 1/3 of the men have developed athlerosclerosis regardless of diet, cholesterol levels or smoking habits. The cholesterol levels are "high" (over 200) in almost all the men, even the ones without artery disease. So I doubt that eating steak has very much to do with it BTW, statins inhibit the body's production of enzyme CoQ10. Depletion of CoQ10 in your body can lead to cardiomyopathy,. chronic fatigue, and even conjestive heart failure. CoQ10 is found naturally in it higest amounts in red meats. If you are taking a statin, and eat little red meat, you may want to consider a CoQ10 supplement.
×
×
  • Create New...