Raf

I just like you guys.

Indeed. You can't cry foul over a trademark you don't own, particularly when you can establish that you had it first. The other big bad rich guy could be forced to change HIS name, or pay you for the rights.

Those who understand English already know that I've never called PFAL "idolatrous pigswill." It's a phrase I reserve for Mike's posts.

What the Hey, I really don't have time to teach you basic reading comprehension today. I recommend you start with Hooked on Phonics and graduate to the I Can Read series of books. Let me know when you're on Dr. Seuss.

Is this going to be the thread where Mike answers all the actual (not apparent) errors in PFAL? No? Then it's just as worthless and just as much a waste of energy as every other Mike (who's a vicious, misogynistic idolater) thread that's been here since 2002. Or 2001. Or whenever he started posting his idolatrous pigswill.

Presented as "fact," even fewer people are buying it.

And there are many more who recognize that PFAL was a tool that brought them to the Bible, not a new replacement for it.

I have no problem with Wierwille's books. I think they're fine, and I appreciate a lot of what's in there. I just don't think they're perfect, and I acknowledge the existence of plagiarism in them.

[clicks on properties to check...] Rhino is correct.

The same way a nation can worship a bronze snake originally employed by their God to heal them, Oldies.

Must we get a list of chapter titles that prove nothing every three weeks or so? Those chapter titles don't prove that Mike hasn't exalted PFAL over the finished work of Christ. Mike has written that Christ learned from PFAL. Jesus Christ, THE WORD, learning from PFAL!

The dispensationalists, when they got their act together, had quite a bit in common. The list you posted sounds like it could have been the table of contents to a Bullinger book.

I'd give it to him (though you're off by one word, George).

Dooj, your move.

Well, it's kind of amusing to me that Lipitor is being ripped to shreds on one thread, but to so much as question noni juice or other assorted gas-infused liquids gets you charter membership in the wind tunnel.

So, first we determine that it's good and that it helps people, then we question objective researchers who try to prove it and, finding no proof, debunk it? How does this work? I know, "wind tunnel." That's what I used to say about people who made fun of this cult I was a part of.

Amen and hallelujah!

Does that mean you've suffered long enough? :)

Hi seeker! WordWolf linked to one of my articles on tithing. I'd recommend (shameless plug alert) you read that article and then jump on my web site, http://www.livingepistlessociety.org There are five articles there called "Cultivating and abundance of..." (faith, speech, knowledge, diligence and love). Those are all directly related to the subject, though they are written to stand on their own. I have one more article to write in that series, and it wraps them all up in the "God's Standard for Giving" package.

Be meek to The Teacher... Defy The Teacher... Geez, and they wonder why I use the word "idolatry."

That's quite an entrance, Zoltan. Coffee?

You're kind, too, Ron.

What, no drambuie? Don't you know where you are? :)

It's been my habit to get the new people here a cup of coffee, but after seeing this post...

That's the only time I've seen someone get it right and wrong at the same time. George, forget the movie you posted: check the clue. Say it three times fast. Five times. As many times as it takes...