Raf

Rhino is correct, and yes, that is a Mai Tai. :)

This should take about 0.372 seconds

Oh my God, it's The Terminator. Theater Minotaur Thea terminotaur

Happy birthday, Shell!

He's not hungry.

Try this site: http://www.wanderlist.com/TVcommercials Dang, I thought there was a link there. THere's not. I'll keep looking.

Bluzeman, I was not aware of that. I'll ask Paw if we can delete some of the older ones.

Actually, sounds like you're back ON topic to me. :) For the rest of this tract, CLICK HERE.

Hey Mark, You didn't need to delete EVERYTHING, including links, didja?

WordWolf, By what standard did you say Stuyvesant was number 3 behind Bronx Science and Brooklyn Tech? It was the toughest of the three to get into (Science was second, Tech was third).

Prince of Tides ?

Are they your own images, or from the web? Rhino's way is easier. You can also do this: If they're from the web, right click on the picture and look for "properties." When that pops up, you'll see a line that says "Address (URL)". Copy the url. Then type (img) (using brackets, [], instead of parentheses). Paste the url, then type (/img) (again using brackets instead of parentheses).

I'd like to think you've heard the word "mosque" in the last 35 years. Masjid is more obscure, easier to forget. :)

Some Muslims use the word "masjid" instead of "mosque." MAYBE that's why Mike had trouble remembering it?

He means he didn't understand you. Try asking your question a different way. I thought he answered you quite fully, so obviously, I didn't understand your question either.

Actually, Dance Hall Days was Wang Chung's first hit. Everybody Have Fun Tonight was second, if memory serves.

And that's with a THE thread that's been DYING. Remember, the current THE thread is only the most recent. The original THE thread had more posts than this has had views. :) Die, THE, Die! Oh, that's simple then. The answer is, don't.

Where to begin? 1. This is not a forum about newspaper experiences and the media. Rants against newspapers aren't expected. Rants against TWI should not be a shock to anyone on this site. 2. If you had ranted against newspapers on an open forum, I would have said, "Wow. Sorry you feel that way. But I still love my job." I would not have said, "Well, if the anti-newspaper people aren't going to be happy for me, I'm just going to leave Greasespot, you inconsiderate oafs!" This is a site where anti-TWI statements are to be expected. Why were they such a SHOCK in this circumstance? Because it was an announcement? Really? That's the best argument you've got? Because I've already dispelled that one. Announcement: to everyone making announcements promoting old TWI materials: Not everyone here appreciates old TWI materials, and praise GOD we have the right to say it now! Don't be surprised if some people do. It's a freedom we were deprived of in TWI. Toughen up a little. Even Mike laughs at my stuff sometimes!

We all do it, Duane. You'll get the hang of it.

And they spoke. Not everyone was screwed over by the Ford Motor Company, and some people retired from Enron and sold their stock before things went to hell. They might be interested in a Mustang or an autographed photo of Ken Lay.

If you posted a Mustang for sale on a message board featuring people who feel they've been screwed over by the Ford Motor Company, you can bet your bottom dollar you're going to get some animated responses. I've got an autographed picture of Ken Lay for sale. I think I'll go over to the ex-Enron message board, "announce" it, and see what they say.

Does this say "this is just an announcement?" Does it say "please don't respond unless you have something nice to say?" I would think that GSCafe is the LAST place where one would be discouraged from saying what we really think of PFAL.

We can all be a bit more respectful. But this is the Open Forum section of GSCafe, so no one should be surprised when people openly respond. Speaking ill of the recently deceased is in bad taste. Speaking ill of an inanimate object is not. For some of us, PFAL represents something good in our past, the way things could and should have been. For others, it represents great pain and great hurt, a tool used to exert control and hedonistic opportunism. On an open forum, particularly on one that has repeatedly disavowed the label "Christian forum," don't be surprised to hear both viewpoints. It bears repeating that WG was never insulted or attacked in any way: it was the PRODUCT that was insulted and attacked. If that hurt her, well, she has the right. I don't see why she should have been surprised or insulted, and certainly not attacked.

There is a Michael Moore category. It's called "Best Use of Misinformation and Deception to Challenge Misinformation and Deception." The category is better known as "Best Arm Wrestling Contest at a Leper Colony."