Raf

Hmm, new quote... Okay, an easy one... "Hey, Vasquez! Have you ever been mistaken for a man?" "No. Have you?"

Sigh. Okay, here's the thing: If it wasn't shown on a big screen at a movie theater, it wasn't a movie. Just like, if they put pineapple on a pizza, it ceases being a pizza, just by virtue of it having pineapple on it. Chicago was a musical made into a movie. Joseph was a musical that was filmed. Not a movie. And so help me if you start quoting Cats, I'll banish you from this thread now and forever!!!! Oh, wait. I can't do that. Oh well.

You see, HCW, it doesn't replace the Bible. It just sort of replaces it. Or, rather, it "replaces" the Bible, in a way. But it doesn't replace it. Get it? So what you have to do is not replace the closed Bible on your shelf: you merely have to replace the open Bible on your desk. Or your lap. That way you can master your book on keys to Biblical interpretation without having to worry about opening the Bible you're supposed to be understanding in the first place... Just Like Wierwille Wanted! I still think Wierwille's knuckles would bleed from the force of repeatedly slapping Mike upside the head for this boneheaded and backward theory of his.

Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat. Movies only, please. Next quote?

See?

HCW, Please cease and desist from using your brain as a framework for understanding Mike in these discussions. Logic, reason, the Bible, THE VERY WORDS OF PFAL ITSELF, have not dissuaded him from his idolatrous sycophancy, nor have the denials of VPW and every editor Mike has contacted who worked on the books. As far as this subject is concerned, he's autistic. He lives in his own little world and although he is capable of some communication with the world around him, he is simple incapable of being a fully functioning member of society.

Imagination As real as I dream it is It's not just a book

Christian Biblical Counsel (V. Finnegan) is, to the best of my knowledge, now closely aligned with Buzzard on major issues. I've lost touch with CBC, but last I checked there were only a few differences. V's son attended Buzzard's college, I think.

uhhh.... yeah. yeah, you do. uh huh. riiiiiiiight.

You mean you're just now getting that picture? Mike: PFAL is God-breathed. Wierwille: No it isn't. Mike: God oversaw the editing process. Editors: No, He didn't. Who you gonna believe?

Hubby! is correct. Any dream will do, but not any DVD. Did they make a movie out of that?

Well, you see Steve!, some people are mod, but some people are not quite mod. We call them "moddish." A moddish washer is like a bathtub for people who are cool, but not that cool.

Two days! I think I feel my taste buds coming back. Ahhhhhh.

Assuming you meant me, So far so good. 24 hours! Woohoo! And I survived a night out, which is the more remarkable achievement.

What does their country of origin have to do with it? Oh, you meant...

...cigars. Which brings us back to smoking.

Correct! Sho, what did you think of my Sean Connery impershonation?

We should change the name of this thread to "The Big O" That'll get the post count up right quick.

No. Another hint: "There izh a peash that izh only to found on the other shide of war..."

You're halfway there. That's the name of the character who says the line.

Okay, let's start with something simple: Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery. Wierwille not only committed adultery, he condoned it, and in the Christian Family and Sex class, failed to teach against it. That he did so routinely and damaged lives and families for it is quite documented. Is that "according to the Word" enough for you? What we've done with Wierwille's works is no different from what he did with Bullinger's: took what he liked, discarded what he didn't. The only difference is, we were not all taught by Bullinger, so Wierwille had no need to document where he thought Bullinger was wrong. But when you listen to ANY Christian minister, you do the same thing: you consider what he says that is right, but you also identify that which is wrong. You do this routinely, but you criticize us for doing the same with Wierwille. Why is that? Why do you get to say that Wierwille is "98%" right? Is it because you've identified the 2% that is wrong? What gives you the right? And speaking of Appollos, doesn't the Bible specifically say where and how he was wrong? So what's wrong with doing that with Wierwille's works? You protest too much. You also failed to answer my question: how do we "prove all things" without identifying what's right and what's wrong?

You mean will I do something like: believe in and teach the Trinity, then change my mind and preach against it? believe in and teach immediate life after death, then turn around and teach the opposite? believe in and teach tradition, then reverse myself and teach what I think the Bible actually says, and throw tradition to the wind? God, I hope I change my mind as more accurate information comes to light for me. It's what Dr. Wierwille did.

THEre can be only one.

k

Wierwille was lucid when he gave his last lost teaching, but not lucid when he made it abundantly clear that PFAL is not God-breathed. Get with the program, Def. Mike: "PFAL is God-breathed." Wierwille: "No it's not." Mike: The editing process was overseen by God. PFAL's Editors: "No, He wasn't." Who you gonna believe?