Being thin reduces the numerator. Being tall increases the denominator.
Height actually has a greater proportionate effect. A 10% drop in weight (same height) drops the BMI 10%. A 10% increase in height (same weight) drops the BMI 21%.
Unfortunately, almost half of the presidents were 6"0" or taller. Clearly, we can rule out Taft and Trump.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
420
206
322
305
Popular Days
Apr 5
17
Jul 11
11
Feb 15
10
Nov 28
10
Top Posters In This Topic
GeorgeStGeorge 420 posts
Raf 206 posts
WordWolf 322 posts
Human without the bean 305 posts
Popular Days
Apr 5 2023
17 posts
Jul 11 2023
11 posts
Feb 15 2024
10 posts
Nov 28 2023
10 posts
Popular Posts
GeorgeStGeorge
No. (Misread it.) George
WordWolf
Raf clears the table! (Been practicing billiards lately?) A) 1605 was the last time- before JP1- that there were 3 different Popes in the same calendar year. It has to coincide with the concl
Human without the bean
Don't forget about me Raf, I'm so petty too. From "Wildflowers" to "The Last DJ".
Posted Images
GeorgeStGeorge
So BMI = 703W/H**2.
Being thin reduces the numerator. Being tall increases the denominator.
Height actually has a greater proportionate effect. A 10% drop in weight (same height) drops the BMI 10%. A 10% increase in height (same weight) drops the BMI 21%.
Unfortunately, almost half of the presidents were 6"0" or taller. Clearly, we can rule out Taft and Trump.
I'll try George H. Bush.
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
We can clearly rule them out both due to them being heftier.
No, it wasn't anyone from my lifetime.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeorgeStGeorge
FDR?
George
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.