You posted this in atheism. You do NOT want to know what I think of Charlie Kirk.
So I will move it and I will ask that we refrain from referring to the killer's motive as "demonic," which (under the umbrella of the atheism forum) is a lazy scapegoating that robs a homicidal a-hole of responsibility for his despicable act.
And I will ask that we refrain from politics, which is impossible in a conversation about Charlie Kirk (which is why I feel compelled to change the name of the thread).
So henceforth, this thread is narrowed to the following:
Quote
Kirk said that "I think we as Protestants and Evangelicals under-venerate Mary. She was very important. She was a vessel for our Lord and Savior....We don't talk about Mary enough. We don't venerate her enough. Mary was clearly important to early Christians."
This seems rather disingenuous and hypocritical, coming from someone who was known to be an outspoken misogynist. One might even suspect he was pandering.
You posted this in atheism. You do NOT want to know what I think of Charlie Kirk.
So I will move it and I will ask that we refrain from referring to the killer's motive as "demonic," which (under the umbrella of the atheism forum) is a lazy scapegoating that robs a homicidal a-hole of responsibility for his despicable act.
And I will ask that we refrain from politics, which is impossible in a conversation about Charlie Kirk (which is why I feel compelled to change the name of the thread).
So henceforth, this thread is narrowed to the following:
Do we agree? [moving to doctrinal).
Raf please do what you feel is best. My sole reason for this post was to discuss Mary the Mother of Jesus and what Kirk said about Christians not venerating her enough. If he was right then we, whoever wants to, may do good to give it some appreciable thought...thx
Recommended Posts
oldiesman
Oops I guess the links are working...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
They are now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raf
Out of respect:
You posted this in atheism. You do NOT want to know what I think of Charlie Kirk.
So I will move it and I will ask that we refrain from referring to the killer's motive as "demonic," which (under the umbrella of the atheism forum) is a lazy scapegoating that robs a homicidal a-hole of responsibility for his despicable act.
And I will ask that we refrain from politics, which is impossible in a conversation about Charlie Kirk (which is why I feel compelled to change the name of the thread).
So henceforth, this thread is narrowed to the following:
Do we agree? [moving to doctrinal).
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
This seems rather disingenuous and hypocritical, coming from someone who was known to be an outspoken misogynist. One might even suspect he was pandering.
Is that too far off topic? Remove if necessary.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldiesman
Raf please do what you feel is best. My sole reason for this post was to discuss Mary the Mother of Jesus and what Kirk said about Christians not venerating her enough. If he was right then we, whoever wants to, may do good to give it some appreciable thought...thx
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.