Ham

Thanks for the kind words J.T. I think some of my best ideas come during over-caffeinated mornings. Just picture a Chihuahua with a couple cappuccinos in it.. all of the energy has to go somewhere.

I have always wondered what they really do with the bulbs that they have been forced to mark and avoid. Maybe they save a few up, rent a Ryder truck and drop them off somewhere past the 250 mile radius around headquarters.

Thanks for the input! You guys that were "closer to the fire" really know your stuff. Jim, I would not be suprised if that is not exactly how one of those meetings would go. In Martinpukes era though, I think they would get more of an extensive reaming because the staff was not spiritual enough to know ahead of time when the bulb burned out, and replace it before its demise. Now we do not wait to catch the bulbs in the act, genuine spiritual suspicion is all that is necessary!

How many directors does it really take to change a light bulb? Obviously, it must be four or more, since with three they have been sitting in darkness for many, many years, and still cannot get any light going. Even with five on the board at one time, they were still pretty well light bulb challenged. What say ye?

But Rosie would be safe; Paul was a logical man. After examining Rosies appearance, he probably would come to the conclusion that any "modification" would be for the better..

What would Paul do? I have wondered. But if he ran accross the current BOD and/or their minions, he probably would be greatly tempted to go back to his "old man days" and beat the living **** out of them.

Of course, there is the now priceless book: "Christians could have been prosperous" In small print, "if they did not join up with us."

If they are not too busy, five or six staffers could try to learn to change a light bulb- might take five or six at the same time.

I offer a even newer and improved version. Only send me 66 payments of $666.00. Address it to: The Teacher New Knoxville Ohio. The Post Office will know what to do with it..

I think these guys may be a little ahead of us here.. http://www.fadetoblack.com/cultkit

"Truth is no guarantee for sincerity." They certainly proved that one!

I wonder if the next lawsuit will demand that the offshoots give them back.

OK Trefor! I think I have met the master, but here is one more weak Yankee attempt at greatness: There was once an old maid called Rosie, who otherwise sat rather cozy. As much as they tried to repair her old hide, you'd think she was beat with a hozie.

"Donna, its about time you got out and helped Harvey."

"Harvey, we might be able to get this thing started if you just pushed a little harder.."

I think you guys are giving the current BOD some ideas. In the distance I can hear them attempting to restart their now dead Present Day Truth Ministry.. (rrrrrrr, rrrrrrr, rrrrrrr, cough, cough, sputter sputter)

Quite true- five is supposed to be the number for grace. After what they have done, it certainly is grace that they still exist..

Hey, if we keep this up, maybe Paw can publish "Greasespot Cafe Album of Verse".

Please, do not accuse me of besmirching the Irish. No comparison to the Irish was intended.

Here's a limerick if they decide to turn it into an Irish wake.. An Oakie was once in New Knoxville, who claimed that all others were awful. He wished he could stay at the beautiful place, but he just had to make it a brothel.

Folding chairs? I don't think they use folding chairs anymore. They marked and avoided them, apparently they were leaving too many creases and wrinkles in the laundry..

Perhaps Rosie should dump Donna.. Rosie could claim that she is finally towing the line, and adhering to the no pet policy.

And by the time Rosie is gone, the younger part of the group that is left will be just as old, evil and inept..

Thanks for your kind words Pat! I am sure that boiling in oil is too good for me in their eyes. I have been wondering, so much of this discussion (and previous discussion) has not been a target of an accusation of libel. The only logical conclusion is that the majority of the insinuations here are actually based on fact. Presented with the same facts, anybody would come up with the same conclusion, and truth, no matter how damaging, insulting, or distasteful, is still truth. The last thing they would want would be to have the facts debated in a legal arena. Can you imagine how they would explain to the remaining followers that they lost in yet one more ill-conceived legal quagmire?

Anyway, I think my answer to the forum question is: I took PFAL enough times that I learned to bring my own coffee cup.