oldiesman

How should i know? You're asking the Ford to explain Henry.

You are correct. The catholic church doctrine won't change or change easily, but any one of us can go to the traditional mass and worship God and enjoy and cherish the experience in the process. That's where I'm at right now. They don't know that silent SIT is in play with one of their parishoners...

I believe there are many mysteries that mankind won't know about until the afterlife. I pray that Jesus has mercy on us all when the time comes for our own personal judgements.

All the more reason why we probably should rely almost solely on our own direct and vibrant faith in God rather than trusting in translators alone. I know that sounds kinda mushy. But the good thing is I think we are open to other possibilities now...

I think that'd entirely be up to God, Jesus and the Holy Ghost. They'd be the final judges on where we go for eternity. But you bring up an interesting argument about reliance ONLY on the scriptures!? I think it's an established fact here in GS that the scriptures don't always "fit like a hand in a glove" and there are many mysteries that we have been challenged with.

Thx for posting this WordWolf. Ahh the memories. Ralph D., Vince F. and John S. three men of honesty and integrity that I always liked and looked up to. Little story about John S. He and his wife, myself and another lady were going out to either dinner or a movie outside of Emporia grounds. I was wearing what I thought was an obscure cheap cologne called Russian Leather. Inside the car, John's wife couldn't stop commenting how pleasant and appealing it was. Sort of raving about it. I never forgot that! Another company bought them out and here it is, today. I have this and wear it on special occasions: https://www.amazon.com/ELSHA-RUSSIAN-LEATHER-COLOGNE/dp/B0BNWD2PRD

This was a prior question in response to the statement "In Essentials Unity, In Nonessentials Liberty, and In All Things Love." Was thinking it over ... here's my quick 2 cents. I would say mostly Yes. Because of these things: (1) Unity: Yes. Without unity, or a system of "forced" integration with love, what do you really have? There's either a mandate of likemindedness and conformity, which is one of the major essences of an organized religion; or division and confusion, right? You can go on and on about telling people they should live the way they want to live but regarding essentials that's not biblical Christianity, right? Add on the Corps commitment, and you've got assimilation x 2. or 3. "Deny Yourself and be Sold Out to the Program". (2) Liberty: Yes to nonessentials. You like colgate toothpaste and I like crest. You like blue dresses and I like yellow. Granted, there was less of that sort of thing in the Corps. (3) Love: Yes. Without it any religion is ultimately doomed.

Only if one wants to see it in the original... and who knows, maybe there's something there that's different...

Do you know who from and what book?

Yes. But don't remember when I first heard it. I remember a CFS camp on Shelter Island in July of 1973 that I was begging to go to after taking PFAL the prior week for the first time at the same location. 17 years old. THOSE were some of my very good memories. Here's a thread on the CFS camp. Gotta love DWBH posts... always entertaining...

This opens up a whole lot of other questions for me like, does God work with unbelievers as well. Maybe the whole rap of "the fruit of the spirit comes from the manifestations" is bogus. QUESTION for the group: did VPW make that up or did he copy it from elsewhere... Stiles, Leonard, or somebody else?

After watching many episodes of "The Practice" and enjoying it immensely, I have to admit, "It's Possible".

This may be one of the most important topics of our time, i.e., What is Hell? I think Martin Luther struggled with it; certainly I do. Still haven't decided yet, still open to possibilities. Here's another book that I think we discussed at some point in the past: https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=32180704645&dest=usa&ref_=ps_ggl_17730880232&cm_mmc=ggl-_-US_Shopp_Trade_10to20-_-product_id=COM9780595143429USED-_-keyword=&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=17190383924&gbraid=0AAAAAD3Y6guhSTjDY6oAFsx9lSu4SnsCN&gclid=CjwKCAjwo4rCBhAbEiwAxhJlCSy6Q8uurSSH4soZ9p8JiiXjAh8S4jIwrnkXakdETCyLGnk95MVBbhoCj6kQAvD_BwE

This may be a great post in a thread called "VPW was Elmer Gantry". (and I liked both men...VPW and Burt Lancaster.) LOL

Thx Raf just ordered it from Amazon... looking forward...

I'm kinda fuzzy on the loss of rewards part, or else I wasn't paying much attention to Craig when he said all that. When in TWI, I believed that once you earned a reward it was yours forever. I believed that God doesn't retract them. You "walked on the word" for a certain period of time and space, therefore, this is the scorecard God kept and he is perfect love and truth. On the other hand, one's sinning makes one forfeit rewards. Not ones already earned but ones that could have been earned by walking faithfully on the word with TWI.

Born again believers.

You and George Carlin! I still laugh hysterically while listening to "Class Clown".

VPW wrote that in "Christians Should Be Prosperous" or as we've said disparagingly "Christians Believe the Preposterous". https://www.amazon.com/Christians-Should-Prosperous-Victor-Wierwille/dp/0910068658/ref=sr_1_1_so_ABIS_BOOK?crid=CN3UK5C7WKOH&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.jFnxUBdjkeazYzesIel6tw.gOBghEwUDzIzQki4iW1RzHbXO943zbOEsQjo5_TcUWI&dib_tag=se&keywords=christians+should+be+prosperous+victor+paul+wierwille&qid=1748866500&sprefix=christians+should+be+prosperous+victor+paul+wierwille%2Caps%2C86&sr=8-1