Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

GeorgeStGeorge

Members
  • Posts

    21,995
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

Everything posted by GeorgeStGeorge

  1. OK, then. X-Men 2 Hugh Jackman Van Helsing George
  2. I seem to remember an announcer named Lloyd Pettit, though nothing much came up in a quick google. Is that who you mean? Also, Cubs and Sox announcers were pretty much interchangeable, back then. If the Cubs were away, and the Sox were at home, lots of times the home game would be televised. And the radio announcers would change places with the TV guys midway through the game. George
  3. Well, good for you! Care to share with the class? George
  4. Batting .750. The second is Vince Lloyd. All were Cubs announcers at one time. Milo felt he was heir apparent to Brickhouse, and when the Cubs spot went to Caray, Milo vamoosed to Houston, where he's been for a LONG time, now. Incidentally, he was the commencement speaker at my step-daughter's college graduation ceremony last month. George
  5. Actually, it's Yeardley Smith. And, unfortunately, the Julie Kavner pic I posted got replaced with the last cartoon, which really gave it away. George
  6. I think it's a safe bet that I haven't seen this one. George
  7. Here's another "picture puzzle." I ask hiway to refrain from answering immediately. What do these six folks have in common? George
  8. I grew up in the Chicago area, so finding day games was never a problem. (When I visit Chicago, I absolutely refuse to go to a night game at Wrigley.) I don't know if it's been mentioned before on this thread, becuase I hardly ever pop in here; but Cubs fans were really spoiled. WGN televised almost every HOME game, along with a good number of away games. It wasn't until I went away to college that I found out how unusual that was. I suppose I could try this in the Nostalgia Thread, but do you recognize these guys: George
  9. Maybe if I change the second clue, you'll get it. George
  10. After five days, I guess it's fair to google. Sadly, the only other person I recognize from "The Notebook" is Gena Rowlands, and I had to google HER to find a movie with ANYONE ELSE I recognized. Gena Rowlands Paulie Bruce Davison George
  11. I would have gotten "Mellow Yellow." This one, I have no idea. George
  12. I agree with wasway. Sounds like "Gilligan's Island." George
  13. Suda, you're a lot closer than you think! Here's a big hint, though: the title is not in English. George
  14. This could be tough. Three pics. George
  15. If I'm right, I don't get the first clue, but "The Other Side of Midnight"? George
  16. Except, of course, that there was no "Mr. B" in "Green Acres." <_< George
  17. That was the name of a movie? I don't EVER want to hear another crack about "Traxx"! George
  18. Sorry, kid. Just not seeing it yet. George
  19. Tom clearly knows it. Wasway might. But no one's actually given the answer yet. George
  20. I vaguely remember seeing it years ago, but I don't remember enough to recommend it. On the other hand, there is this review from the IMDb site: It's been eight years since I first saw this movie, and it is still my personal live-action gold standard (Lilo & Stitch being my animated film gold-standard). It combines drama, tragedy, razor-sharp comedy, great performances, and the best dialogue that has ever been spoken on film, period. I found this movie quite by accident--I was a sixteen-year-old with a Katharine Hepburn fixation. She mesmerized me; I wanted to BE her--smart, beautiful, sexy, and unwilling and unable to take anything off of anybody (except for Spencer Tracy, but that's another story). Honestly, I had no idea that there really had been such a person as Eleanor until I saw this movie. After watching my heroine portray her, I was determined to find out, though...so I have Katharine Hepburn to thank for my discovery of a new personal hero, and for my passion for medieval history. It is true that this movie is not 100% factually accurate, not only because movie making dictates tinkering with history to create an interesting film, but also because, unfortunately, not too much is known about Eleanor herself. In the middle ages, women, even powerful, intriguing women like Eleanor, were not considered "important" enough to merit full biographical treatment. Most of Eleanor's history is recorded in the context of her sons and husbands. A good deal of this history was written by her detractors--people who disliked or disapproved of her for one reason or another. The simple explanation is that they felt that as a woman, she overstepped the bounds of what was considered "acceptable behavior" for a woman of the period. That being said, this movie is 100% spiritually accurate. It perfectly captures the intrigue, the complexity of emotions and relationships, and tone of the age and the situation at hand. Though the sharp and witty dialogue is often considered a historical anachronism, this is not strictly true. Contrary to popular belief, people WERE educated in the middle ages, even women, if they were fortunate enough to be brought up in noble households, as Eleanor was. She was a brilliant woman, raised in a household where poetry and intelligent conversation were staples (her grandfather, after all, was one of the first troubadours). Henry was an intellectual powerhouse as well--he was a voracious reader who was often caught reading in church instead of paying attention to the sermons! It is unthinkable that these two minds would have produced stupid children, and the notion that the entire family should have only spoken in grunts and simple phrases is equally ludicrous. Though not historically accurate, as other reviewers have noted, the strength of this movie lies in it's perfect portrayal of some of the most fascinating and complex personalities in recorded history. Henry, Eleanor, Richard, et al., make today's political and royal figures seem like low-rent bumbling hucksters. Might be worth a look! George
  21. Except, of course, that this is Name that FLICK... George
×
×
  • Create New...