Raf

Gene Wilder See no Evil. Hear No Evil Kevin Spacey

Clear and Present Danger?

I no see nussink. You got a link? Of course, now it shows up. Nevermind.

Well, Harry and Lloyd never went to Alaska, so I'm thinking, who'd be dumb enough to utter that line? And the only name I can come up with is Homer Simpson. Is it The Simpsons Movie?

Two and a half hours away from one full week without a cigarette or, really, even much of a craving. Liberating.

In the true crime genre, there are several classics. First on most lists, of course, is In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, which practically invented the genre, or at least widely popularized it. Then there's The Onion Field by Joseph Wambaugh. But I'd say the best of the bunch would have to be Fatal Vision by Joe McGinnis.

Ok, no drinking and Chantix! Wow. thanks for THAT warning. And I had a couple of glasses of wine the other night, too. WHEW. Well, I survived it. There is some talk that this product being useful in fighting alcohol addiction, but I suspect that has more to do with people avoiding the places where they smoke.

The Courtship of Eddie's Father Ron Howard American Grafitti

!!!

A quick search turns up a place called "Mi Peru" in North Miami with some pretty good ceviche. I can't vouch for it, seeing I first encountered the term roughly three minutes ago when I read your post. If you just turned 30, you'll LOVE South Beach. If the bride of P-Mosh isn't a fuddy duddy, that is. Last time I was there, one of the more fun places was called Mango's. But honestly, there are so many party places on Ocean Drive that it's hard to have a bad time. No, skip the Shark Valley and the Seaquarium if the kid is that young. Stick with the zoo or, probably better, jungle island. I can't believe I forgot to mention Versailles! Thanks NIS!

Ok, trying to figure out how to count the days here. Yesterday I said it was Day 5, but it was actually five days since, which would make it day six. I'm saying this because, on the pills, it says I'm on day 7. So, I'll go by the pill box.... Day 7. This is either one amazing pill (for me) or one amazing placebo. Either way, I feel really good about not smoking and not wanting to smoke. Yesterday would ordinarily have been a tough day to get through (Mondays and Wednesdays are my longest workdays), but it was pretty much a breeze. The last thing I need to see if I can handle is a night out. It's the only thing I have not really done since this started (we went out Saturday, but it wasn't our usual time or place, and there was no temptation). Will I be able to go out singing and NOT smoke? That is the question. And if I can't, will I give up going out singing? Yikes. Who'll do this?

That is correct

I wanted to apologize about my words yesterday. I examined my heart, and I know in my heart I was wrong. Truth is, I couldn't care less. I even tried. I just can't.

If anyone has the right to say not all former followers are disgruntled, it's Mike. Wake up yet?

Since I don't often check in, I'll drop this in now and, if I'm right, you guys can continue:

Plain old Star Trek No bloody Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, Voyager OR Enterprise.

Finally decided I was going to tell my wife who's the boss. "Honey," I said, proudly, "I've read the Bible and I'm going to assert myself as the head of this household. That's right, I'm the head of this house and you will submit to me!" Well, I didn't see her for a week. After that, I could see her a little bit out of my right eye...

Nice. Nice. Those are the only three categories listed. The Media Other [presumably non-Way] Christians Disgruntled former followers How about this for a category, JAL: Former followers. Not disgruntled. Shun the judgmental adjective. You have NO RIGHT to refer to me or anyone else as disgruntled, a word you use to dismiss the valid complaints being made by those who have every right to stand up to treachery of VPW.

$5 a pack: 5 packs a week... 52 weeks a year... $1,300. A year. That's a mortgage payment. (No, they're not up to $5 a pack, but some weeks are more than 5 packs, so it balances out).

An amazing thing just happened. I read this over and over again, and the more I read it, the less I cared. Look, it just happened again! Wow. No matter how many times I read it, I find that I COULD care less, and I instantly do!

Awesome pic choices!

Day 5. Actually thinking less about it, except that the pill does cause a tiny bit of nausea (I'm supposed to take it on a full stomach and I never do) and the quitting causes... well, you don't need to hear that. Let's just say I have extra reading time and leave it at that. I'm still "tasting" that residue in my mouth. Looking forward to being rid of that. No actual cravings, although I do get "habit cravings," the desire to smoke as something to do: the absence of a desire for an actual cigarette negates this craving rather effectively.

Whew, that's a lotta questions. I live in Fort Lauderdale, about a half hour north of Miami. If you're coming after October 15 and you want to try some really good seafood, I suggest Joe's Stone Crab. Stone crabs can only be harvested from Oct. 15 to May 15, so if you go on the 10/16 or later, you're guaranteed fresh (not frozen) stuff. If you get the babysitter: Because I don't know your age, I can't tell you whether South Beach would be any fun. I haven't been there in a long time: it's not fun for me anymore. Call me old. With the family, try to carve out some time to visit the Miami Seaquarium. Think of it as a low-rent SeaWorld, without the ride gimmicks. There's also the MetroZoo and (a kid-favorite) Parrot Jungle Island. And, of course, you've got the Everglades nearby, too. One thing I haven't done in a long time is a bicycle tour of Shark Valley (deceptively named: you won't see sharks). You basically ride along a 15-mile paved path through the Everglades. It is lovely. One warning (and it's a big one): if there's an actual alligator in your path, you miiiiight want to just wait until it decides it's good and ready to move. Or you might just want to turn back. They usually stay away from the path, though. I have never heard of an alligator attack incident in Shark Valley, and I've been here nine years. It pretty much doesn't happen. But you do end up seeing them from a couple of hundred yeards, and I once saw one sprinting (not toward me), which was a real hoot. Hmm. I was going to direct you to the famous "Calle Ocho," but after that, I honestly wouldn't know what to tell you. I don't eat much in Miami. Three, three-and-a-half or so. And that last leg seems endless. But there's fun to be had along the way. Stop off at Pennekamp State Park, the original Tiki Bar, or the Islamorada (pronounced "eye-la-more-ah-da") Fish Company for fun, drink and food (in that order). You may also want to pay us a visit in Fort Lauderdale: we've got a fun little science museum kids love, a family-friendly beach and a nice shopping strip on Las Olas Blvd. Speaking of shopping, be sure to check out the mammoth Sawgrass Mills Mall and, for bargains, the Swap Shop. Hope so. Look me up while you're here. We'll grab foodstuffs.

Well, I can't speak for the laws in those states, as I am not familiar with them. The AP Stylebook and Libel Manual (1992) states: But that's old. So I looked for a more recent AP Stylebook. In it, I find no mention of libeling the dead. But I'd rather move away from that argument anyway, as it would justify saying ANYTHING about VPW, whether true or knowingly false (e.g., VPW raped pigs while teaching). The real issue being asked here seems to be: Is it libel to call VPW a rapist? Let's assume VPW is alive, if only because we all agree the matter of whether he is breathing at this time has no bearing on our moral obligation to be truthful and/or to make our statements/opinions in good faith. In order to prevail in a libel suit, the plaintiff has to prove five things (according to the AP Stylebook 2007): If I were counsel for the defense, I would: Concede item [1]. Argue that under item [2], the statement is a legal opinion based on the testimony of witnesses. Call the witnesses to prove the statement is true under item [3]. Concede item [4]. Argue under item [5] that because I firmly believe the accounts of the witnesses who testified for item [3], even if I may be wrong about item [3] and the court may disagree with me on item [2], I made the statement in good faith. Thus there was no "actual malice," which in legal terms means the statement was not made with the knowledge that it was false. I'm not a judge, so I can't tell you whether my "defense" would prevail, or whether that would vary state to state. Context is also key. By itself, the statement "VPW is a rapist" would probably be libelous. However, this board can be considered, in many ways, an ongoing conversation, so it's perfectly fair for the person who makes the statement to defend himself by citing the information that led him to this conclusion. Thus, even though the words "VPW is a rapist" were used, the full meaning of the statement in the ongoing conversation is "I believe VPW is a rapist based on the previously discussed 'testimony' of a witness I trust." Now, if VPW were alive, he could sue over the statement that he is a rapist. But if he were to do so, he would subject himself to cross-examination from the witnesses who've now come forward. They, in turn, would need to drop their anonymity (most media would not run their names anyway). The person who made the statement "VPW is a rapist" would need to prove to a jury either that the statement is true or that he had compelling reason to believe the statement is true. I don't know if this post answers anything, but at least it gives some perspective from someone who writes about people's alleged criminal behavior all the time.

Anyone know where the letter went? I don't see it anywhere.