Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Raf

Members
  • Posts

    17,244
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    187

Everything posted by Raf

  1. There is probably evidence that the moon is made of cheese, too. Keep an open mind! White cheese is white. The moon is white. Swiss cheese has holes. The moon has craters... The revisionists do not provide evidence: they distort it. If you call that "evidence," I submit you're wasting your time "considering" a position that has no basis in reality.
  2. I say a piano has 88 keys - why you feel the need to play the same note all the time is sometimes baffling. It would be nice to hear a different note from you every once in a while. :)
  3. Groucho, It is wrong of you to opine that Wierwille wore a swastika while committing his reprehensible actions. It's okay, however, to opine what he was thinking when he said we were on the wrong side of WWII.
  4. You can "opine" that's what Wierwille meant, but that requires us to ignore his promotion of The Myth of the Six Million, which has nothing to do with whether we fought on the wrong side of the war because of communism. And another thing: There were only two sides to that war. To say we fought on the wrong side is to say we should have been fighting alongside Hitler instead of against him. We made a deal with the devil with regard to communism and WWII, no doubt. But we were on the right side of that war. For that matter, you could say we fought on the wrong side of WWII because the Italians were big on punctuality, so we were fighting punctuality.
  5. Just because the communists fought on the right side in WWII doesn't mean we fought on the wrong side.
  6. I thank God you have the freedom to waste your time with what these deniers of history (I do not include Browning on that list) have to say. Browning does not deny the Holocaust, does not deny the numbers, does not deny the gassing, and does not deny the Final Solution. He simply shows its evolution and how it came to be what it was. Clearly, the Final Solution had to have a beginning. He didn't take office and sit in front of a typewriter and say "To Whom It May Concern: I've got this idea." Call it "spin" if you want, but Hitler actually planned and began to implement the execution of Jews, and succeeded at killing about 6 million of them, many in gas chambers. If that's spin, then "George Washington was the first president of the United States" is also spin.
  7. Hitler did not have a plan for emigration of Jews from Germany! He had a plan for eradication of Jews from this mortal coil! And I do not accept IHR's spin on their loss to Mermelstein. It's spin, just like everything else they write. Slapping the word "institute" on something does not make it a place of learning and research. This is disproven propaganda. Jews know it. Nazis knew it. Honest researchers know it. Dishonest pseudo-researchers can pretend all they'd like, and the gullible-beyond-measure can continue believing them, but it doesn't change the truth. Hitler planned and approved the execution of millions of Jews, and succeeded at killing somewhere around 6 million of them, many of them in gas chambers. This is not a theory. It's history. Never forget.
  8. So did he just spend like 100 lines reviving this thread just to say he had nothing to say about the thread? Get back on topic.
  9. Oh my God. It's a countdown! Checkmate! Checkmate! Independence Day Here's a tough one... "Women will sleep with you if you write a book?" "Women will sleep with you if you write a bad book."
  10. I wanted to applaud, but was too drained to do it. No one in my audience applauded (at least not audibly: I applauded silently). There were many, many tears. I shed a few, but "sobbing" would not be an accurate description for me.
  11. I don't think there's one word that can capture it. I don't want to say "Go see this movie," although on quality alone it deserves it. If I were a movie reviewer, I'd say "go see this movie," because their job is to recommend well-made, well-acted films. I don't know if it brings closure or healings. It does make you enormously proud of the passengers of flight 93. But at the same time, the unmitigated hatred it brings out for the hijackers easily spills over to a hatred of Islam (particularly in one scene: let me know if you spot it). The more I think of it... Bring tissues. Confront your discomfort. Go see this movie.
  12. Well, I saw it tonight, and I'm glad I did. It's gut-wrenching, powerful... You really want things to end differently, but you know, of course, that they won't. Still, I have a renewed appreciation for the passengers who rebelled. Nice job on the part of the director, the actors, and the re-enactors (men and women who played themselves).
  13. It's not off topic. Those two posters were mentioned in the opening post on this thread. I'd have to do more reading of all his posts to answer the "profession" issue. I was under the impression that it was more than a mere interest. And if the reaction he gets here stops him from posting, then I suggest "surprise" is an appropriate word. But if you can come up with a better word for it, I won't quibble.
  14. I wasn't complaining about the horse. I just didn't get it. Now I do. :)
  15. Regarding the two posters who "know" LCM, one of them is some kind of cult researcher. I suggest that a cult researcher who is surprised at how former cult members might react to his words needs to reconsider his profession. Freud, if you're reading this, and if you're good at what you do, come back. Consider the audience and don't be surprised at the tone of some of the replies you get. It shouldn't surprise you. Don't let it turn you away.
  16. Someone explain Mr. Smith goes to Washington, please. I guessed it (look at my post and you'll see). But I don't get the horse.
  17. Well, I don't know about you distinguished gentlemen in this august body think, but I'd rather sit here and sound out the words to this pictionary for hours, days if I have to, before I can determine whether or not it's all right. Days, I tell ya. Mary! Mary! Don't you recognize me? I can't read the danged Oscar teleprompter!
  18. You know, when it comes time to exterminate them, no one has any trouble identifying "Who is a Jew." Along comes WTH (which must stand for "What's The Holocaust?"), naysayer, skeptic, smear-spreader and HOLOCAUST DENIER, to say that not even Jews agree that Jews are Jews. WTH: You have no credibility on this. The evidence is there. The Jews who are Jews share genetics with the Jews who you say are not Jews, proving that Wierwille was wrong. Hitler had no problem identifying the Jews when he proposed, plotted and attempted their extermination. ANd he got close to or over 6 million of them, according to the evidence you don't even refute with any actual evidence of your own.
  19. But the modern Jew is Semitic.
  20. Actually, Oaks, I think the latter is a better definition of agnosticism (except I would add that it neither supports nor discounts the existence of God, according to the definition). Atheism would state that the evidence DOES support a belief in Nogod. (I like that. :)) The atheist belief is a conclusion, while the agnostic belief leaves the question open.
  21. I'd disqualify "Zeta" as being some way to get the "Zee" sound, primarily because it's not even a "Zee" sound. It's a "Zay" sound. I'm not nuts about the Saw Knife Red Engine, either. :)
  22. Raf

    I Love Bagpipes

    Happy Birthday ILB! And WELCOME MR. PIPES. Welcome to Greasespot. Welcome to Freedom. Welcome to Fresh Air. And welcome to Greasespot Coffee: Better than Starbucks!
  23. Oldies, lean real close to the monitor for this one: It was an intentional, systematic, planned, event by Hitler and Co.
×
×
  • Create New...