Bolshevik

You could probably google "Gap Theory" and find the same info. to print out (Then you can toss the rest of the syllabus )

I know the Timothy head is in the Founder's Room closet. Was their a statue also? Nevermind . . . someone just told me . . . (sorry)

YES Dooj YES!!!!!!!

I simply am not convinced of evolution. I don't claim to know what happened either. (I was raised in twi, I don't claim to know anything about the Bible.) I've heard of arguments within the scientific community about how much of a scientist a biologist (and medical doctors) realy are. That's not even touching the evolution debate.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID...r=7&catID=2

Perhaps you could point out the answer to my question then? Is the assumption that the plates have always moved at the same velocity? No dramatic shifts? HOLD ON!!! Who are you talking to? Quit bringing religion into this.

Obviously something over your head.

You mean like this one? http://www.cybersleuth-kids.com/sleuth/Sci...logy/index1.htm and "little explorers"? http://www.littleexplorers.com/subjects/as...ontinents.shtml

Well from that same website:

And you're an authority of "scientific soundness"? Is there an assumption that the plates have always moved at the same constant speed?

I dunno Waysider, I'm no vpw apologist, but I could think that's a possibility. Just one power hungry dude taking advantage of another. Damned straight they do.

Well you could look for stretch marks.

I took the post-lcm Advanced Class ( ) Did he talk about some of this stuff? (I mentioned some of what he said in the foundational class earlier)

Let's see, Maggie Muggins, Johnny Jump-Up, Mr. Ambassador, Cheif Cornerstone, Snowball Pete, Henry Baloco(sp?) Did I miss anyone? I think we'll call them a "Region"

I'm a Russian pufferfish on a ex-cult memeber site?

I also want mention that dude who thinks pterodactyls are still around. They live in Papa New Guinea and their poop glows in the dark.

Oh, I thought you disagreed with me. Yes, there are a lot of weird preachers out there with of-the-wall-stuff. (lcm's interpretation of the big bang and the ice age being one-and-the-same comes to mind). Don't know J.S. Nietchze, Hitler, Social-Darwinism I've heard about. Have heard a Bible-beater on TV say evolution can't be true because an orangatan can't make a phone call. (WTF???? ) So you're saying Creationist can be quite stubborn and arrogant (and downright silly). I agree. I'm saying most people don't know enough science to even argue. Disproving a Creationist argument doesn't prove evolution.

Why do you keep bringing up the Bible? Does everything have to be science vs. the Bible? (Let's just assume everything in the Bible is false, heck, Jesus rose from the dead, how's that possible?) I just know the more biochemistry and genetic courses I take, the more unlikely it appears. You know that UV rays damage our DNA. Now, those proteins that slide up and down the DNA, find damage, use light rays as a magnifying glass to fix it, HOW THE F__ does that appear by chance? One protein. Come on, ONE PROTEIN. Evolving. A few genetic defects here or there and POOF!! Show me. (Humans alone are made of what? 40,000 different types of proteins.) Yeah, I took the courses under the Harvard PhDs too, I heard their lame-brain arguments too. Always the "Well maybe it coulda happened like this. . ." Lawyers. The lot of them. So they think of a way it could have possibly happened and that's science???? The drug companies don't have it that easy. You keep saying "growing evidence." Where? Seems like there are more obstacles everyday for the evolutionists to answer. (Of course you mentioned biologists, we could go into the old "In science, there is only Physics" discussion on that, but of course, you only seem to be programed ot point-and-laugh) As already stated, scientific support for racism and the like. If evolution be true, it's only a matter of time before humans begin branching into new species. (A long time of course) It's also nice to know that the hamburger I just at was a distant relative. If we can subdue animals, our evoluitionary relatives, why not people? I'm sure you've thought of more.

well you didn't want to talk strictly science, and wanted to bash other people's attempts to solve the riddle. Just thought if people are ready to accept evolution without really understanding it, deciding there's no other possibility, then they are ready to accept the social implications.

Narrow thinking. So, which race of people do you think is more highly evolved?

Don't know about the Ark. But the possum is found in the Americas. How did the the proton pump evolve? (Or any membrane protein for that matter) Did he happen to mention how much we really know about the genome? there's so much, and the evolutionary mechanism is so poorly defined. A few changes here and there? come on.

You know not what you speak of. I wish people would have the guts to think for themselves.

Maybe he does. What evidence (and an experiment would be great) convinced you that evolution must be true? Far as I know, most who believe in evolution believe it because someone simply told them it was true. Someone told them there was a complete fossil record, and they just believed it. Kinda like the guy who said he found an old document with some greek words . . .and many just assumed he was right. Then went around laughing at folks who didn't have "The Truth." Where's the hard evidence for macroevolution?

Microevolution is not macroevolution. There is a difference. Which makes it non-science. How can you perform the scientific method without an experiment? This argument is silly. Yes there are fossils. No, there is no complete fossil record to verify that species evolved from common ancestors. This has many sides. Are neandertals a different species? Maybe, maybe not. Still, no complete fossil record. (and in this "fossil record" numerous "fossils" were found to be true fakes (planted as practical jokes in some cases), although the impact that they had for the evolution argument remains.) Do think he could keep his job if he denied evolution? I think not.

Ha-Ha-Ha!!! Snort! You've found experiments to prove evolution huh? Enlighten me. That's called microevolution, yes that is proven. But a poodle is as much a dog as a german shepard is a dog. The genetics to make them has always been present.