Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Nathan_Jr

Members
  • Posts

    2,874
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    53

Posts posted by Nathan_Jr

  1. I heard someone say, “Forgiveness is the forgiver absorbing the price…”

    (Usually, the phrase is absorbing the COST. Cost and price are not the same.)

    Any thoughts on this? The forgiver absorbs the cost/price. 

  2. 21 minutes ago, Rocky said:

    F***Mobile

    Tha motor coach?

     

    21 minutes ago, Rocky said:

    "Be part of the [bowel?] movement."

    Accuracy like it hasn’t been articulated since… the last time I wrote of victor paul wierwille squatting over and defecating into the mouth of God. 

  3. 22 hours ago, Rocky said:

    1) Because humans are inherently social animals.

     

    Right.

    22 hours ago, Rocky said:

    2) The older you and I get, we are indeed more comfortable and secure in our own skins. Is that because we have FOUND our "tribe?"

    No. Not I.

     

    Take this to another thread, if you want. 

  4. Chock, I think you’ve proposed TWI is very similar to JW. I see it now. Oh, do I see it!

    I’ve been reading threads here https://reddit.com/r/exjw/s/DyxZAxIuy3. From the org structure to the ever-morphing, doctrinal bulls hit to the manipulative control, it’s uncanny!

    Terminology is slightly different, but the meanings and implications are exactly the same.

    Just so sad, gross and stupid.

    The crisis of cult - religious, ideological, political, national - is the single greatest existential threat to mankind. IMO

     

    • Like 1
  5. 54 minutes ago, Rocky said:

    And WHY do we buy those demands? It's certainly NOT logic.

    Could it be the human condition of needing/wanting to belong to a group with whom we FEEL comfortable, sharing beleeefs in common?

    This need to belong seems especially strong in the youth, the codependent and the immature. Cultural hegemony makes sure we find our group to belong and mark divisions accordingly.

    It’s something to pay attention to. Why this need to belong? Maybe it’s not a problem, but how can we know unless we inquire? How can we see what we are doing unless we look?

    The older I get, the more comfortable and secure I am with myself, the less I feel a need to belong to any group in order to feel comfortable and secure. 

  6. 12 hours ago, Stayed Too Long said:

    From my point of view, as an athiest, all the mythical gods, and Alluh, Elohim, etc….., the names of which are endless, are a myth. They never existed, they do not exist now, and they will not exist in the future. 
    Once you accept the fact that once you die, and you will go to the grave and decay like any other life on earth, you no longer have to be concerned about gaining or loosing rewards from an angry or loving God. Whew!!! Thank God. Lol. 

    I don’t disagree.  

  7. 2 hours ago, chockfull said:

    When I was a teenager and love bombed by the WOWs I was 100% blissfully ignorant.  I would have to say over time and conditioning that turned into willful ignorance.

    Those two categories 100% still exist today.

    “Above all, stand.”

    ”Commitment”

    ”Just beleeeve it.”

    ”Rely NOT on your own understanding.”

    • Like 2
  8. 25 minutes ago, Rocky said:

    The only thing I challenge(d) was that willfully ignorant people were the only ones who couldn't/wouldn't recognize it.

    Those who are blissfully ignorant (by default) usually can't see it either. Perhaps that's why pictures of crowds of Germans saluting their fuhrer and only one person declining to do so is so stark.

    Human nature is human nature. Having to suffer before people begin to recognize the absurdity is part of human nature, perhaps unfortunately. 

    Well, I said there were two groups: the willfully ignorant AND the DUPED intent on believing inaccuracy into accuracy. My mistake was to say ONLY, so, yeah, that should be challenged. Fair enough.

    The blissfully ignorant are easily duped. 

     

     

     

  9. Fair, but I'm not sure this is an argument against my claim.

    Indeed, most humans can't see the influence of cultural hegemony on their lives. Cultural hegemony requires duped beleeevers and the willfully ignorant for the influence to be effective.

    Ideologues and their ideologies are problematic, whether religious or political or social. And verbiage is the Soma captivating the masses and lulling them into submission. We are as easily impressed by the quacks on the pulpits as by the "life coaches" on Instagram.

    I think we have to suffer through this before seeing it clearly, unfortunately. But once seen, it can't be unseen, then we might see it everywhere.

  10. 7 minutes ago, Stayed Too Long said:

    I did a search on Dionydus, who was also known as Bacchus, and could not find any reference to him turning water into wine. Please provide a link. 
     

    Right. Not in exactly the same way. But Hellenized Jews and pagans would have recognized the implications and connections. Jesus did it better, so the story goes, effectively superseding Dionysus.

    https://mythologymatters.wordpress.com/2020/02/24/the-mythology-of-wine-vii-the-wine-miracles-of-dionysus-and-jesus-compared/
     

  11. PFAL and the collaterals are replete with logical fallacies.

    One of the very early fallacies in the corpus is a non sequitur: John 10:10, therefore keys.

    Logical fallacies, errors and stupidity are embarrassingly apparent everywhere. They literally leap off every page. Only the willfully ignorant and the duped intent on beleeeving them into accuracy can't see them.

    • Like 1
  12. 45 minutes ago, WordWolf said:

    The rule, established at the beginning of the thread, is identifying the movie.

    Some of us like to add the name of the character or the scene, but that's not required, that's just us communicating and having a little fun.  (It's optional, but often appreciated when it's done.) Feel free to name the actor and/or the character.  Just don't forget to name the movie, that was the whole point! :)

    Thanks

  13. 1 hour ago, Human without the bean said:

    Airplane      Wally Cleaver's mother or Barbara Billingsley

    "What ain't no country I ever heard of.   They speak English in what?"

     

    Pulp Fiction - Jules played by Sam Jackson (Is attributing the line to a character or actor a rule?)

  14. 55 minutes ago, Human without the bean said:

    I was thinking that the line was only memorable to me but thank goodness someone else knows it.  I love that movie.  Yes, that's it.

    I haven’t looked at this thread all week, but I definitely consider that an easy movie quote. One of my favorite movies, too. 
     

    “Oh, Stewadess! I speak jive.”

  15. 4 hours ago, Charity said:

    My misunderstanding then oldiesman - I thought when you said that the phrase "father in the word" was powerful, you were referring to how vp used it, which led me to think that your being encouraged to "go back there" meant twi.  I connected the dots incorrectly - thank you for the clarification.    

     

    I think you made an easy connection based on how the dots were arranged, to your point. I thought the same as you.

    Thanks to all for clarifying. 

  16. 1 hour ago, penworks said:

    Yes, there's that. But more importantly and shockingly is the fact her mom was part of VPW's sex ring, as I call it. 

    The situation of his seducing women is depraved. If my mother had been part of that, I can't imagine how heartsick I would be.

    Charlene, did the girl give you any indication that her mother eventually woke up to realize she had been used and abused by a fraud? Or does her mother still believe that victor paul wierwille was a man of god?

  17. 2 hours ago, oldiesman said:

    Yes.   It was powerful.   So powerful that I use it today with my Catholic "mother in Catholicism" who encouraged me to go back there.

    Go back where? To New Knoxville?

×
×
  • Create New...