Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Gay Teenagers


ex10
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was going to let this go, but I changed my mind.

quote:
Originally posted by Second James:

I am hetero & sexual preference to me is something I don't even consider in dealing with others...

I call bull****!

Item 1: “guilty of disobedience to God’s heart…”

Item 2: consistent use of “homo” instead of “homosexual.”

Item 3: “in the dealings I’ve had with ‘homos’ … very seldom that I’ve been dealt with honestly”

Item 4: “…in my life its been super super hard to really ‘buddy up’ to someone who in the back of their mind would have an unGodly adgenda possibly for me in their behalf…” This one takes the cake! You don’t even consider sexual preference, but you presume to know what “unGodly adgenda” [sic] exists in the back of someone’s mind.

Item 5: “possibly for me” in the above quote indicates that you take someone else’s sexual persuasion rather personally.

Item 6: “..thus in allowing a child to sleep over etc with a homo..I'd definitely put my foot down.” This indicates that you consider it a threat to your child.

Do you really think that your attitude is not apparent to every homosexual with whom you come in contact? If so, you’re deluding yourself. Do you really think, with an attitude like that, that your “attempts to treat him with civility and encouragement” (even that wording displays your attitude) come across as anything like being friendly? Do you think that the "cold & indifferent" reaction you get is “because of their sexual preference?” Sorry, Charlie. It’s because of your attitude about them.

“I am hetero & sexual preference to me is something I don't even consider in dealing with others...” Yeah right. That might make you feel good but it's bull****.

Well, I see our friendly autocensor is busily shielding innocent eyes. Funny, that **** is far less offensive than "homo" and denotes something less foul than the air that must linger about some who "don't even consider" sexual orientation in dealing with others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 382
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i don't even know what to say on this thread

first of all it's taken me a long long time to get over (and always working on it) the crap i was raised with and then of course the little cult

i spend a lot of time these days trying to convince neighborhood kids how wrong / hurtful their attitude is regarding homosexuality

i don't know, seems we're very far from where we should be

this neighborhood is primarily catholic - irish, italian and then your others (big wink2.gif;)-->). most moved here from brooklyn, staten island, bronx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The anti-gay concept that I find most hilarious (and even bordering on insane) is how homosexuality is supposedly a threat (immediate or ultimate) to: 1) marriage, 2) family, 3) the entire Western civilization, and 4) G rated movies.

Amazing how much crap someone can extrapolate from that one account of Sodom and Gommorah in the Bible.

icon_rolleyes.gif:rolleyes:-->

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea like the pro-creation argument. Like we need more people in the world. I don't know about you but I thought the whole idea of Adam and Eve was to go forth and produce, because God had foreknowledge of the christ child being born. Well if Christ has been born as the Christian church proclaims, died and arose, why continue to pro-create? Why continue to blame the homosexual for not being able to reproduce.

As I said before, adultery and divorce seem to me to be destroying the family more than anything else.

Speaking of overpopulation, all them people starving in the desert, why don't we take all that money that we raise to feed them, and MOVE THEM to where they can plant food and feed themselves??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the greater inconsistencies of TWI was in its characterization of those who were "homos" as being particularly worthy of scorn because they were "possessed". However there were many,many, ( I mean alot of ) alcoholics in TWI - so many so that it was "winked at" yet by Way teaching alcoholism was caused by the "Leviathan" spirit. But somehow being a drunk (and consequently possessed) wasn't so bad since there were so many of thoses types around. "hey . you got mad at your wife and maybe hit her ? So what. you can get back in fellowship". Thats TOTAL BS yet I heard stuff like that.

Alcoholics and their corresponding behavior have done more to wreck lives, families, business, and mental health than any gay person of which I know. I guess Liberace was an abomination in the eyes of God yet the typical boozer was cool ?. Sure. Its cool for liquor heads to fight, lose jobs on a continual basis,

disappoint their children but for someone to be gay is worse ? Different standard. Guess having an alky devil spirit is cool with God ? Sure. Its being a "good ole boy" huh ? I know Way devotees who have lost their jobs, families, and their productive years to booze yet they think that because they weren't gay that god is somehow more respectful of them ? Get real....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excathedra, are you a New Yorker? I hadda bunch of friends in The Way from there. George C*mella, Tony Cr*sera, Linus Math*s, Cathy McEv*y, Kathy M*cIntyre, Todd Byrn*s, Ir*s Tate, Carol Sap*o, Glen and Louise Abr*mson, Vinnie Rocc*salvo, to name a few...

Those New Yorkers have always been a funny bunch to me. So many of them were so sarcastic to me in the Corps that I thought that they hated me. But really, it was "just them" and their "dryness" or whatever it is called. I finally got used to it and liked it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Hey you got mad at your wife and maybe hit her? So what.....

This is not only a precept of TWI but of other churches also. During some "down time" during my involvement in TWI I attended a home town church for about 6 months. During that time I met and married a man.......just a few months later we got into an argument and he threw a pop bottle at me. I was shocked, and went to the pastor of the church (he had counseled us before marriage) and told him what happened. Unbelieveably, he took my husband's side and told me that I wasn't being a submissive wife.....PUKE..PUKE...PUKE Worse, his wife agreed........

These are the people that think they have the right to judge others? This does border on insanity..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by GarthP2000:

... or innocent until proven homo?

icon_confused.gif:confused:-->

I knew as soon as I wrote that somebody was going to take a cheap shot. No Garth; innocent until proven impossible to get along with. There are very few people in that category as I am able to get along with most people; hetero and homo, Democrat and Republican, Liberal and Conservative, black and white, male and female, etc, etc.

JerryB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by George Aar:

And just when was it that all of you righteous heteros made the decision to be straight?

Was there a pivotal moment in your life where you realized you could either do the Godly, righteous thing and only desire one of the opposite sex or you could turn yourself into a reprobate by making the conscious decision to become a homosexual?

Honestly, did anyone in the history of the universe ever make such a choice? Gawd, this is so stupid.

George, we've discussed the "choice" issue at length already. My thought is, it's not so much a consious choice but a coercion or spiritual manipultion. You can go back and read it in more detail if you wish.

Peace

JerryB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by diazbro:

One of the greater inconsistencies of TWI was in its characterization of those who were "homos" as being particularly worthy of scorn because they were "possessed". However there were many,many, ( I mean alot of ) alcoholics in TWI - so many so that it was "winked at" yet by Way teaching alcoholism was caused by the "Leviathan" spirit. But somehow being a drunk (and consequently possessed) wasn't so bad since there were so many of thoses types around. "hey . you got mad at your wife and maybe hit her ? So what. you can get back in fellowship". Thats TOTAL BS yet I heard stuff like that.

Alcoholics and their corresponding behavior have done more to wreck lives, families, business, and mental health than any gay person of which I know. I guess Liberace was an abomination in the eyes of God yet the typical boozer was cool ?. Sure. Its cool for liquor heads to fight, lose jobs on a continual basis,

disappoint their children but for someone to be gay is worse ? Different standard. Guess having an alky devil spirit is cool with God ? Sure. Its being a "good ole boy" huh ? I know Way devotees who have lost their jobs, families, and their productive years to booze yet they think that because they weren't gay that god is somehow more respectful of them ? Get real....

You bring up a good point Diazbro. This relates somewhat to Trefor's post about ex ex-gays.

If homosexuality and alcoholism are spiritual or partly spiritual problems, then both situations should be treated the same way. With honesty, love, and patience.

There are alcoholics who get delivered from booze. I know a few. They get saved and they quit. And there are alcoholics who get saved, but don't get delivered from booze. Does that mean that the experience of those who do get delivered is counterfeit? Are these people Christian frauds? I don't think so.

There are people in just about every category of human suffering--whether it be cancer, alcohol, depression, sex addiction, or homosexuality,--who receive miraculous deliverance by Christ. And in just about every category, there are those who pray just as hard, but don't get delivered. I don't think anyone really knows why. Faith is certainly one element, but it's hard to tell someone who's waging a losing battle with one of these things that they don't have enough faith. Only God knows what's in the heart and we can't really make that call.

So why are there ex ex-gays? Same reason there are AA dropouts. But that doesn't mean that AA is a scam or that homosexuals can't get delivered.

Peace

JerryB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaaand I'm starting to repeat myself, so If you'll all excuse me, I'm going to try to get caught up on some other projects that have been lingering for the past week and a half.

Peace

JerryB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fail to see how it helps anyone to say that they are possessed or spritually manipulated when they have not faced a "demon/angel" themselves.

To say this about someone is just plain ignorance of the spritual forces which are rooted in the Father of spirits.

And I'm not talking about homosexuality either.

It takes A Lot of Love to cut through the crap.

It takes courage and the heart of God to go toe to toe and eye to eye with an angel of darkness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

edited-so as not to offend

sorry to leave u hanging Jonny and Garth

well now i've pulled the whole thing down

not making a diff anyway

i've deleted more would be posts

then i've posted recently...

Edited by CM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CM

I had to go and look at your profile. All this time I thought you were a woman, and I thought to myself, damn, this woman cusses like a trooper! But when I looked at your profile, I saw that you are a guy, and so, that explains it a little bit.

I'm not sure I see the reason for your f word rant however...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:

If homosexuality and alcoholism are spiritual or partly spiritual problems, then both situations should be treated the same way. With honesty, love, and patience.

But why then aren't people talking about alcoholics with an equal level of intensity and disdain as they are gay people ? By Way teaching they are both caused by demonic possession so one must be willing to address both

categories ( as well as *all* those afflicted with so called "devil spirits) without distinction. In TWI lifestyle the alcoholic and drug addict is tolerated whereas the gay person is not. And the typical rationale behind that is that the bible has more to say about homosexuals than other types of demon induced maladies.

In many cases some have used this as a way to direct the focus to "gay people and their abomination" and away from their own personal problems. But its a frequency issue. We encounter many more alcoholics than we do gay people (at least to the best of our knowledge) so this leads to some familiarity with the situation. We might even have a substance problem ourselves and because of that we don't want to be judged so harshly by others.

I've heard Way trained people say things like "well I have my problems but at least I'm not gay so I won't have that to deal with at the bema" ? They wrongly rationalize that (at least in my opinion) , because they aren't gay, then God will cut them slack. Like a "get out of jail free" card. Imagine this conversation at the "bema" (where in Way teaching one receive rewards though only if Craig has approved them :> ).

"Hi God... Sure I had my problems with the bottle and I was a miserable parent and chased evey skirt I could but hey... I'm a guy and besides I knew lots of guys like that. And come on.. you MADE me like that.. you know what its like for us... And HEY ! At least I wasn't gay so give me my rewards !"

Its like such a person thinks that God grades on a curve. Like He would average human behavior and judge on that. Why would he ? He is omniscient and absolute so its only reasonable to assume he would deal with each person on their own terms *not* in relation to someone else.

I don't now why people are gay or how they wind up that way BUT if a person believes it is the result of demonic possession then that person should also be prepared to deal with the other types of so called "devil spirit" problems. We cannot arbitraily decide that its okay for us to disparage a particular group and let others off the hook just because one set of behaviors is more common.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:
But why then aren't people talking about alcoholics with an equal level of intensity and disdain as they are gay people ?

Listen,

If people here at the Grease Spot Cafe were saying, "Alcoholism is okay, there is nothing wrong with it, God doesn't say that it is wrong, alcohol addiction is a perfectly okay lifestyle so quit being so judgemental, it's not my bag, but it's perfectly okay for those who choose it", then I would say that there would be an argument against such sentiments.

People would supply story after story about the destructiveness of alcoholism, and they would supply scripture verses that are not supportive of drunkeness. Yet the majority of us, accepting that alcoholism is bad and dangerous, would also agree that it is right to love and treat alcoholics with respect. But we would also agree that alcoholics are doing something that is wrong and not healthy.

The fact is, very few people, if any, take a stand FOR alcohol addiction. If they did, ther WOULD BE

quote:
..people talking about alcoholics with an equal level of intensity and disdain as they are gay people ?

So, your argument here doesn't hold much water. You may take another tack on this, but this tack is weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jonny Lingo:

quote:
But why then aren't people talking about alcoholics with an equal level of intensity and disdain as they are gay people ?

It is my general impression that among alcoholics, it is commonly recognized that further feeding of their alcoholism is bad. They know it. They also know that it is real hard to control, and that often they just dont have the self-control to be able to control their desire for more alcohol.

Yes drunkenness is a sin or broken fellowship, but when people realize that such is their state, they also are the first to tell you that it is bad. They know it is bad.

So what is to debate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually John given TWI's interest in "logic" then the arugement is very strong.

If one wishes to discuss maladies/problems that are presumably the result of "devil spirit affliction" then that peson must be willing to deal with *all* of them and not selectively examine one above all the rest and ,worse, let others off the hook for having a so called devil spirit when they don't extend the same courtesy to all who are similarly afflicted.

Within TWI the reactions to those with undeniable substance problems were very mild as if it was something that "just happened" to us all (which of course isnt true). But Way teaching demands that alcholism be considered as the result of devil spirits so why was TWI , in its typical view of alcholics, very forgiving (and in some cases indifferent) whereas gays were represented as the enemy ?

And even those suspected of being gay or those who might sympathize with gays were equally as bad. Yet the boozers got the wink and as along as they didn't really mess up (I mean really) then they were left alone.

Again if being gay is the result of a devil spirit as is alcholism then we must deal with both similarly and not excuse the behavior of the latter (which TWI has done routinely and even for VPW) while vilifying the former. Its simply not "logical" by Way or general standards.

Worse. There are those christians who feel that because gay people exist then their bad behavior will be forgiven since God will surely focus all his wrath on the gay people while leaving the straights alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...