Leaderboard

I would like to dedicate this word study to WordWolf whose incessant mining of data coupled with public education is a constant inspiration for those of us seeking truth. I would also like to dedicate it to the little wood nymphs who come out in the wee hours to drink ale and party with me. Many people have been desirous to understand the last words of Victor Appalling Cyclops, yet without applying sound research principles many erroneous interpretations, often out of desperation at the "loss," have been formed. In this study we shall take a close look at the history and etymology of his last words which were: "Loshanta, loshanta malakasito loshantaaaaaaaiiiih" Using biblical research principles we can take this phrase apart and determine (by god's revelation given only to me in a sandstorm at the 7-11) the true meaning of Dr. Cyclops' last words. Many scholars believe that "loshanta" is a single word. Indeed this is only because of errors in the scribes who copied Cyclops' last words. It is actually two words; lo and shanta. Some scholars believe that the word shanta may actually consist of two root words but that is another study. The word "lo" has been studied the world over. Its exact etymology is uncertain as it appears almost simultaneously in various primitive languages around the globe. It has had many translations but all languages and all translations have one thing in common. "Lo" is always associated with trouble, evil, darkness, sometimes even with a future reference as in "a foreboding of evil." "Lo" became more common in American English with the writings of the Cyclops manuscripts where its meaning was corrupted to mean something unknown. However a close look at "lo" and its historical derivatives clearly shows the link to evil. "LO" man! Whaddup? Let's get down [lo] to the corner and cop some-a-dat drop [lo] dead [lo-lo-lo] excellent rock that the gang just got in. I know this guy who can score it for us by da name of Lo Mein. Take careful note of the relationship between "lo mein", "lo mala", and "yo mama." Naw dude I don't wanna go down [lo] there. That Lo Mein is just a lo life. Other examples include: Man I feel so high today how about you? Naw man it's a lo day for me. That was a low [lo] down [lo] hence [lo-lo] thing to do. I hate people but I'm lonesome. Even the sad good bye in Hawaiian has roots in this dark work as in; Aloha. Man it's a lonely Friday – guess I'll go out on the down-lo. Contrast with the sound high or hai: Man I feel great – so high man. (Japanese) Would you like some more sushi. Hai ("yes" - a positive word). Shanta is a word that is also often associated with darker concepts, actions, and even titles at times. Shanta is almost always tied to the concepts of theft, stealing, debt with dire consequences. Christian mythology later perverted this word to have a meaning diametrically opposed to its roots in theft. This was accomplished by bestowing the (modified) title Santa on a large motor-coach riding person who gave instead of stealing. This concept has been largely debunked except in primitive Christian societies like the United States of America. Looking more closely we see the following examples clarifying it's roots in theft: You shanta taken that bubble gum from the drug store. They gonna lock you up in a jail man – an iron shanty (orig. shantay). My momma's sister, Shanty Jane, got busted with some drop [lo] dead [lo-lo-lo] excellent rock. Here we see the beginnings of the juxtaposition of both words "lo" and "shanta." I want ta [shanta] rob that store and cop the cash. A pattern now begins to emerge as we look at the word malakasito. Malakasito is also a word with clear lineage encased in evil. The etymology of the word to modern usage is similar to how the English word "ball" is derived from the Greek word lambano [λαμβανω]. Most students will remember "lambano, lamballo, ballo, ball. I invented the hook shot." Malakasito is similar. Malakasito → malakasy → malady → milady →my old lady – all having connotations of evil. Also malakasito → malakasite → parasite. Examples include: This H1N1/a (swine flu) is a global malady [malakasito]. My old lady [malakasito] always gets angry when I go out drinking, gambling and chasing other WOW ladies [from milady from malakasito]. Do you see how perfect the language is when you just work it like you were taught to? It just fits like a fist in a butt! A slight return is in order for the last word, clearly a derivative of lo shanta but in this case with an extended ending of "aaaiiih" , i.e. loshantaaaaaaaiiiih. Aaaiiih is a first person cry out. It can be either victory or defeat depending on the context. In the case of Dr. Cyclops' last words we see that it is clearly a combination cry of victory and defeat. Now, putting this all together into a victual appalling to screwage we see the true beauty of research principles as well as shedding accurate light on historic events. Dr. Cyclops last words were in effect: I am the one indescribable evil! I am the lowest of all of life! I will steal all of your money for my drinking and womanizing! Low Life is my Life! Where is my freaking eye Chris!!!! This was "The Cry of The Cyclops." Edited for some formatting issues with cut and paste.

I don't get this sentiment (for lack of a better word) Linda. George is not all that repetitive, although, like all humans repeats on occasion. His repetitiveness is dwarfed by some people whose posts number in the many thousands and could be reduced to a single post - "Oh woe is me. I was abused. My story sucks. Life sucks. I'm still trying to understand breathing and other autonomic nervous functions." Now those are also valid posts - but when it is the (mostly) only thing they post - well that's what the rewind button is for on windoze media player. Keep posting George - you're honest evaluation of so many things is a lot more fun (and informative) than the "ghost busting."

:lol: :lol: :lol: George

No argument there. As I noted in the earlier post - even the posts I consider repetitive have their validity and the users have the option to post whatever they want within the GSC rules. I doubt he thinks that way of you - he is actually one of the more gentlemanly people on this site when it comes to disagreement...however that "drooling dodo" thing - dammmmmmit Linda - don't put candy in front of a child.......

:)

Half a God ??! I don't even think we knew who God was! Or we had the wrong God all along. They taught you must believe!! Believing equals receiving.. Yeah, what God does that?! Oh, the YOU GOD! And the off shoots haven't figured it out either.. CFF still teaches the believing junk.. STFI/CES goes a step further.. Their God is just like you, only a little smarter. He makes mistakes since he's not all knowing, but since he knows more than us, he makes better decisions, just not always the right one! Who could trust that God?! Yeah.. I know I got suckered into ignoring the "other" side of God that doesn't bark when I believed He should be barking!