-
Posts
14,745 -
Joined
-
Days Won
204
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by Rocky
-
Yet ANOTHER lawsuit filed against The Way International today!
Rocky replied to igotout's topic in About The Way
I would be surprised if this particular point has not been thoroughly litigated already. That's a wonderful rhetorical question. (Therefore, I'll not look it up at this time) -
Yet ANOTHER lawsuit filed against The Way International today!
Rocky replied to igotout's topic in About The Way
I'm confident (as a former accountant) if twi WANTED to take care of Dorothea, medically and financially, they could have gotten around it. -
Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards. - Soren Kierkegaard I wonder if, during his life, he ever read enough of Kierkegaard to have grasped this reality?
-
Wierwille's problem (in contemporary American culture and religious history) is not simply the ubiquity of the internet, but also the immensely immense growth of social and psychological scientific knowledge and understanding over the last two millennia. Not to mention how many people can read and write because of the proliferation of public education (worldwide).
-
Was that why they were so SAD you see? Isn't it amazing to still, after all these years, find a memetic expression from Wierwille and the PFLAP class so easily retrieved?
-
I'm uncomfortable seeing a post like this (which seems obviously copied from somewhere) without the source citation provided. Thankfully, finding it for this one was easy. http://whatdoesthebiblesay.weebly.com/18-characteristics-of-a-pharisee.html
-
Emotions are contagious.
-
Proverbs 3:5 Huh?
Rocky replied to Stayed Too Long's topic in Atheism, nontheism, skepticism: Questioning Faith
Oh. Okay, thanks. I appreciate that you provided more insight on your reason for starting this thread. -
Proverbs 3:5 Huh?
Rocky replied to Stayed Too Long's topic in Atheism, nontheism, skepticism: Questioning Faith
Did something happen? -
To clarify, if I wasn't adequately clear, At this point, my understanding is with machine learning (ever increasing base of data from which to make inferences), computers can indeed make reasonable and in some cases quite accurate predictions about an individual's preferences. YouTube and Netflix are pretty aggressive in doing so. Neither gets my preferences right all the time. I'm not sure what Netflix does about the fact that I'm enthralled with a documentary about how babies learn and come out of the womb ready to engage other humans. Otherwise, I have been enjoying the dark crime drama series Ozark lately. It's like each episode is it's own short story with the same setting and characters, but new dilemmas each time. Oh, and notably I watched American Hustle last night. I've been wanted to view that movie since it came out about ten years ago. Main reason? Amy Adams' beauty... and seductiveness (and being scantily clad plenty of times in it. For a decade I didn't realize there was actually a story to it. The story is a fictionalized version of the ABSCAM scandal. Frankly, I don't expect to watch it a second time because it drags and other than the overdramatized confidence game angle, it was mostly boring. But Amy Adams was very hot in the movie. OTOH, Netflix is prompting me to watch a couple of Bourne movies... which I do enjoy. I'm not uncomfortable with you introducing this tangent. I'm confident the issue with distraction is VERY common these days. Maybe not limited to sexagenarians like us. I will not be surprised to read in The Loop about distraction and increasing attention deficits. I don't see it necessarily in the table of contents of this book. There's no index so I can't look it up. I also, I appreciate the humor in some of your comment.
-
Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards. - Søren Kierkegaard
-
I infer that you and I as homo sapiens, members of the human race, aka humanity, do have free will AVAILABLE to us. For thousands of years, a clever segment of cultures and societies, con artists used confidence or con games to manipulate us. Wierwille was that kind of clever individual. It's not so easy to parse his motivations. Hence, biblical references to only God being able to discern what's in a person's heart. Among the research described in The Loop (noted above) it IS available to read people's faces, other nonverbal cues, and actions to make snap judgments with a degree of accuracy. Further, in reflecting on Shoshana Zuboff's research in The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, we know there's lots of clandestine surveillance going on online. Beside tracking cookies (which can be minimized and suppressed to some degree), it is wise to never open spam emails and other dubious items on social media. It is obviously possible for various sources to plant more sinister tracking software on one's computer that way. The rivers of my understanding bring these things together to infer the truth about points in my OP above. Knowledge is power. Truth shall set you free... or at least help you get and stay as free as possible.
-
Some time ago, Mike posted about, let's say, limitations on human free will. While I didn't find the case he made to be particularly compelling or coherent, I did start to recognize some of my actions IRL did not and do not match what I thought I intended. In the course of my (somewhat compulsive) reading explorations, I found a book The Loop: How Technology is Creating a World Without Choices and How to Fight Back. Some notes I've made from the book: if we don't familiarize w/mechanisms of our brains we'll be vulnerable to those who prey on us and will run the risk of being blind to the effects thereof. our unconscious (subconscious) minds powerfully shape our lives unconscious tendencies are the control surfaces by which technologies will shape our lives cultural forces work to convince us we make independent choices when we do the opposite even years before scientific consensus on controversial findings, nascent understanding becomes bases for entire industries; hence, surveillance capitalism two researchers (as a team) wrote key papers 1971-1979 and their findings are still challenged, but have become foundation for industries in behavioral guidance unconscious biases manifest (in decisions) under pressure and moments of uncertainty research subjects (people) faced with situations they didn't understand were powerfully influenced to make choices they didn't understand, producing scenarios likely to constrain future thinking 99% of our waking activity is strictly automatic and habitual our brains are shortcut machines, desperate to hand off difficult cognitive tasks many (nearly all) of what we think (believe) to be well-considered choices are, in fact, offhand, instinctive decisions "although research has show inferences from [observing] thin slices of nonverbal behaviors can be surprisingly accurate, there is no good evidence trait inferences from facial appearance are accurate. There are two (decision) systems at work in our brains. System 1 makes snap judgments, without conscious analysis/effort; System 2 involves actual analytical intelligence. These notes are from the first couple of chapters. Intuitively, it seems to me this research and reporting, with overtly stated focus on technology, can be used to take new looks at historical events to recognize patterns involving the pervasive nature of cults worldwide in contemporary times. Notably, twi, the LDS church, and JWs... but also many more. I have long recognized the significance of my younger life exposure to the Catholic Church/religion as having "primed" me for PFLAP and twi.
-
Now THAT is funny. I saw this just now and I thought of everybody on this thread and this platform/website.
-
I agree TWI was (is, I suppose still) a Pharisee-LIKE organization. To me, this topic is ripe for an understanding enhancing discussion. Indeed, Skyrider's OP presents salient food for thought. Twinky counters by saying she doesn't think she can agree on the apparent main point, and then proceeds to enhance discussion with other salient points. I appreciate both but hope readers can look beyond terminology which might inadvertently shift focus to a win-lose posture. It doesn't have to be adversarial at this point. Defining terms can be helpful to clarifying discussion.
-
Taking responsibilty. A long hard look at ourselves
Rocky replied to MarieP's topic in About The Way
As WE know, the twi authoritarians tried to project strength, and for a time, we bought it. Your comparison to the Wizard of Oz is incredibly APT. It occurs to me how twi authoritarians are culturally a couple of centuries behind the times. Thomas Paine (who, when I once mentioned his name in a small group situation w/Wierwille, he started to get agitated), in a time when church leaders had remarkable control over their congregations, wrote The Age of Reason. In American culture/society after WW2, the level of education in society grew exponentially, for a few reasons. Public education was a growing phenomenon AND the GI Bill spurred veterans to get post-secondary education. One would think Wierwille/TWI, if ANYONE in leadership had done any introspection they might have been able to recognize this trend. So, it's not surprising to me at all they didn't get it and probably still don't get it. -
Therein the ultimate CON JOB just had, once again, the curtain go up so we could all see it for what it was nearly 50 years ago that pulled us in. The sense of belonging kept us there (for me, it did so for 12 years), but... was the hook, from the start.
-
I emphatically recommend to you to read Jacob Ward's book (I linked in my earlier comment) The Loop. The end of the chapter on The Reality Gap: "Unconscious choice is still very much in its infancy as a scientific field, but that hasn't held back efforts to turn its findings against us. People outside the sciences--especially in the world of business and politics--have been catching on to the idea that humans have an unconscious "code" by which they make choices. More and more, companies and political operatives have sought to use that code to shift our behavior. And while the first wave of that sort of research was fairly primitive, there are now whole courses taught at top universities around the world about how to use these findings to persuade customers and sway voters, as we'll examine in the coming chapters. "Now that we've seen how powerfully our unconscious brains shape our lives, let's look more deeply at how they tell us what to do. Because if we don't familiarize ourselves with the mechanisms of our brains, we'll not only be vulnerable to those who prey on us, we'll be blind to the effects." I'm reading The Loop because I have been increasingly aware of the actions I take and decisions I consciously make which do not actually end up being what I thought I intended. Further, I'm increasingly concerned about the adverse impacts social media has in my life, most notably in terms of procrastination and efforts to focus on actual goals. Therefore, while I am not inclined to use the same words as you about the matter, I'm beginning to put 2 and 2 together independently, recognize, and recall your writing on the subject. This is also why I have been almost obsessive about avoiding online ads (I use adblockplus, Kamo, and anything else I can find to suppress/minimize the impact of surveillance capitalism, religiously), I loathe broadcast ads, don't listen to any radio station other than my local public classical music station, subscribe to television programming which blocks commercials, and watch/listen listen to clips on YouTube for music. Yet, I am also aware of AI on Netflix, and on YouTube. I believe you will find clarity and further insight on this subject, which you began writing about some time ago.
-
Might Mike have been onto something when he started telling us we may not really have free will? On page 16 of The Loop: How Technology is Creating a World Without Choices and How to Fight Back, author Jacob Ward writes, "Our actions feel voluntary, and therefore must be under the direct control of our will, right?" (emphasis in the original) "Well, no. Goodale and Milner [a team of neuroscientists] found, in carefully crafted lab experiments, that our perception is not under direct control of our will." (emphasis mine) This is in a chapter titled The Reality Gap. Maybe I missed it, but I don't remember reading where Mike may have made a distinction between what we perceive and how we act. This relates to this current thread because how we perceive determines whether what we see, perceive, and recognize might cause us to define something as a miracle or not. BTW, you might be able to find The Loop by Jacob Ward in your local public library. I did, in mine.