Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Rocky

Members
  • Posts

    14,829
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    204

Everything posted by Rocky

  1. What if... the people who wrote the Bible were doing essentially the same thing(s) the writers of Norse, Roman, Greek, or any other culture's mythologists were doing when they wrote what those cultures accepted as godly insight? What if they were simply, within the context of the culture in which they lived and dwelled, were inspired to make sense of life as they knew it at the time? To me, that would make a lot of sense and explain the silliness or vanity (or vainness) of: IOW, that pretty much everything Wierwille taught us was -- and putting it this way gives ol' Victor the benefit of the doubt -- was either complete and total bullshonta OR it was simply him explaining life the way that made sense to him. Of course, within that framework, what made sense in life was how VP could most efficiently and effectively separate us from our hard earned money.
  2. I respect these people, historians and other academics, FAR more than Bullshonta Mike, on topics related to this thread.
  3. https://www.amazon.com/Why-Receive-Holy-Spirit-How-ebook/dp/B00IQFBMTE/ https://www.amazon.com/gift-Holy-Spirit-Jack-Stiles/dp/0800704789/
  4. Then there's the question of who's responsible for that which one feeds one's mind (brain). If Mike's right, how many incarcerated humans in how many countries are no longer responsible for what they did? See my comment above about mens rea. Mike is FULL of bullshonta.
  5. Mens Rea refers to criminal intent. The literal translation from Latin is "guilty mind." The plural of mens rea is mentes reae. A mens rea refers to the state of mind statutorily required in order to convict a particular defendant of a particular crime. See, e.g. Staples v. United States, 511 US 600 (1994). Establishing the mens rea of an offender is usually necessary to prove guilt in a criminal trial. The prosecution typically must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the offense with a culpable state of mind. Justice Holmes famously illustrated the concept of intent when he said “even a dog knows the difference between being stumbled over and being kicked.”
  6. Again, an affirmative indicator of Mike's INTENT to hijack this entire website for his own narcissistic purposes.
  7. Rocky

    Doug Mastriano

    Doug Mastriano lost. He will not be the next governor of Pennsylvania.
  8. To make a claim about what "the authoritative ones... are thinking, requires links to what so-called authoritative ones have said aloud. Otherwise it's complete and total bullshonta. You actually have the ear of two professors in the field (a cornfield in OH, right?) is more complete and total bullshonta. There's no room for amateurs like you when professors of neurology or psychology apparently, according to you, don't even have it figured out. Why don't you try to get your book published, chapter by chapter, in Popular Science. IF you do, then tell us about it. Until then you're just full of bullshonta.
  9. More evidence of addiction to vain babblings. “Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.” ― Mark Twain
  10. The reason I don't think of it the way you bullshonta suggest is because what you "give it" is a counter purpose to the intended purpose of this site. You ARE a con artist. Your suggestion above lends credibility to the characterization and corroborates your intent to take it over. Not only have you done so, but you appear to have done so with full intent. Btw, remember the first rule of holes? When you're in one, stop digging.
  11. IOW, this time you're NOT saying somebody did something wrong, you're actually asking for clarification? You're, IMO, a total con artist who has taken over the entire website here.
  12. Malarkey. And No, WE discussed nothing. I posted. That's it. I consider you to be a con artist and a thief.
  13. It is my considered (at least for a short time) opinion that Mike has been operating a long con game (off and on, and by that I mean, except for the times he has taken extended periods without posting)for the last 20 years at GSC. He has NOT contributed honestly, IMO, to discussion about twi. I believe CMAN nailed it earlier on Saturday evening.
  14. Hey CMan, I think you finally nailed what Mike's been up to for the last 20 years. Further, I believe he has, unless he has donated ($$$$$) generously to Pawtucket for the upkeep of this website, has morally -- if not technically -- MISAPPROPRIATED resources he should have been paying for all along.
  15. This thread obviously has nothing to do with The Way International. However, it is about Mike's narcissism. Bully for him that he thinks about things other than Wierwille and PFLAP. However, is this subject something he has any authoritative insight on? That's highly doubtful. However, theoretical physicist Sean Carroll MIGHT have s bit of related insight. I didn't go looking for this video. Because I have watched other Big Think vids, it showed up on YouTube when I went to YT. My point: there are LOTS of subjects other than twi worth exploring. However, using Mike as a guide? You'll get what he wants to tell you. (For those who buy Wierwille's concept that you can't go farther than you're taught)
  16. How does any of this matter for, to, or about anything? Let's face it, GSC has become a social media platform dominated by Mike and a small handful of people who somehow get their dopamine fix from asking him inane questions.
×
×
  • Create New...