Nathan_Jr

Has anyone tested and verified Martin's proposed dating? Does he propose this birthdate as a probability or a certainty?

Not a counterfeit, not even a close counterfeit, but a close, close counterfeit?

You FINALLY got it right! So, so right! The duck just sits there... like a duck.

That duck weighs itself.

Wrong administration. You're confused about to/for.

I’d keep it foundational, Biblically derivative. With this in mind, the only REAL way to know is to deliver a beating. If she doesn’t die within two days, she’s innocent.

ROTFLMAO….they call it HQ

60% of the time it works EVERY time.

There’s a whole chapter on how (H-O-W) to poison one’s wife to test the validity of one’s insecure, neurotic suspicions.

@Mike Which one of the following is an UNVARNISHED historical account of the so called 1942 promise? A) God spoke audibly to victor. B) victor asserted a claim that God spoke audibly to him.

I never claimed to know anything about him. That’s why I asked. Not projecting at all. Merely saying what YOU made him SOUND like. Like a SUPERSTAR researcher? I have read the paper. Did he ever super research his way into discovery of the error that is four crucified? Or any of the hundreds of victor’s errors?

Schoenheit has it? He is the arbiter? He has the Truth?

The primary and lasting error of victor paul wierwille's "ministry" is that the Truth is something to be possessed, and victor is the one who has it, and you, too, can have it if you only imitate him and stand on his shoulders. A wicked deception.

Why? How could they when they were conditioned to not go beyond what the charlatan taught?

A temporary sheltering of the truth? A postponed disillusionment? Wow. The progressive, far left woke want the same thing. Hiding uncomfortable truth deprives people from learning how to deal with and understand it. This is ALWAYS a bad strategy, because truth will always, eventually, emerge. Then what? You are left with people Ill equipped to handle the truth.

How would he have known? Why would he be the one that would have known? He did? That's his opinion. You make him sound like someone with a lack of in depth perception and awareness.

It was the DOCTRINES of victor paul wierwille that imitators used to justify their sin.

Sheltering students from any fact or truth NEVER has has merits, especially when a "teacher" claims to be trustworthy. A balance of openness and coverup? A wicked proposition. Only a deceiver would need to to strike this balance. Honesty, transparency, truth telling are not liabilities requiring a mitigation strategy.

All these dependent clauses and prepositional phrases! Yikes! History is not written by committee, propaganda is. Correction: This place is thorough in the gathering of objective historical FACTS. These facts have been objectively and subjectively judged to be mostly negative. Lies and exaggerations are asserted. Those assertions are dealt with and corrected and sometimes even mocked. This is called propaganda.

Is that what VP himself wrote? You think this is some kind of profound insight? It’s not. This has been obvious to virtually every human being for at least 100,000 years.

Is it? EVERY post? Not so fast! Some posts are pure fact, some are pure opinion, some are pure speculation; Some are a mix of only fact and opinion; others are speculation and opinion, but no facts. What does that mean? The word = YourWalk+YourBelieving+TheBible+ChristInYou? That "ministry" taught a great deal of factual error, silly opinion and outrageous speculation. I hope you know you can go far beyond what you were taught, if you want. TOO bullying and controlling? When those in your life get bullying and controlling AT ALL, you have to stand up to them. Those controlling bullies were imitating and standing on the shoulders of victor paul wierwille.

What does that mean? What is a spiritual heavyweight? Who "taught" you that term?

Right. Men and women are not treated as equals in the OT, as prescribed by law. It's not even close. Just wanted to make sure you weren't confused about this.

That the wives were all treated equally by the husband? No favoritism was to be given one wife over another? Certainly, you don’t mean treated as equal to the husband.

Brilliant! mmmmmph