Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/04/2025 in all areas

  1. "W-Why aren’t you talking?” "We’re gonna need more money.” "Why? You were in there for, like, five minutes.” "Dude, they were very convincing!” "Oh… You’re… that guy. Hey, listen, I don’t have any money.” "Do not patronize me, boy!” This is a stand-alone movie, and should not be confused as any sort of sequel to the previous movie- which was so long ago few people remember it even exists. One goof accidentally displayed a clear view of Minneapolis' skyline in what was a movie set in a completely different city.
    1 point
  2. HUSBAND: "I'm so despondent. Were totally broke because of Abundant Sharing. We'll probably lose the house and car. Children's Services might take away our kids. They might even kick your mother out of the nursing home." WIFE: "Yes, dear, but at least you're not a seed boy."
    1 point
  3. Thank you. Yeah, rebirth by serpent seed is a mathematical impossibility if OSAS. It’s also scientifically imprecise. It’s a gloveless hand. And it doesn’t seem to be connected to those verses about blaspheming the Holy Sprit in Mark 3, Matt 12 and Luke 12. Hey! I didn’t rewrite the book. Victor did.
    1 point
  4. Well, it's been over 50 years since I first heard these things, but as I recall, it was covered in what we used to call the "13th" session of PFAL. After the 12th session, in which students *manifested*, there was a separate session on the unforgivable sin. Supposedly, this involved the seed of Satan being irreversibly instilled into people. Born again of the wrong seed, as it were. It was supposed to be the polar opposite of the new birth, and quite different from possession, which could be exorcised. There was lots of talk about many of the people of great influence being "seed boys", and, therefore, irredeemable.(prominent scientists, actors, musicians, world leaders and so forth) Of course, it freaked out lots of people and negated the euphoria of session 12. That's probably why it was eliminated and not revisited until it resurfaced in the Advanced Class teachings. I think it might be included somewhere in the original PFAL collaterals. edit: You can't really accept it as being possible without first believing in "once saved, always saved" because of the element of permanence. It's hard to look back at some of this stuff and not laugh at what a chump I must have been.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...