Leaderboard

funny Wayside .....that does sound like a familiar sales tactic. == == == == I am really looking forward to reading Penworks' book !!!!

But only if there is a pretty, young lass standing behind him, flashing you a subtle wink and a smile.

T-Bone,first of all: thanks. Ironic as this might seem, I have been reading the first chapter of John these past few days in the REV and the commentary is quite lengthy as you know. Yes, VPW had an affiliation with the word pros and went on numerous tangents; the REV/John.S goes even further with logos and as you stated, does not address pros. I have read your dissertation quite carefully and you are spot on regarding what the REV is "pushing". I grew up Lutheran (Trinitarian) but never was a Trinitarian and neither was a grandmother who was also a Lutheran. You are a Trinitarian and I am not. The battle between beleifs such as ours has never ended well - i.e., resolution. I would never initiate a discussion on the Trinity since I believe it can not be resolved; I have come to accept that as important as it might be to the core of our beleif systems and personal theology that Christians can discuss Biblical issues that don't include the Trinity. Moving on, I have not had too many questions regarding the REV itself and when I have posted here on the doctrinal forum it is not necessarily rooted in something written in the REV but in other "versions" as well. I also am a KJV groopy - it's comfortable. In the future, I will just not stipulate any version. There is another thread here in doctrinal that is active that I wanted to interject on but need to get to Ezekiel and find the C and V.