Rocky

I've tried to tell him.

A wonderful human and righteous expression about cults. Thanks both to Twinky and Bolshevik for posting this excellent, though provoking video.

The link works for me. I'll watch the video later because I'm listening to a live stream WaPo presentation on pandemic preparation.

I went to see Sharky's Machine a few times in a theater when I was serving a wow year in OH. Loved that movie.

No doubt I have been. I blame Wierwille and TWI. But I have worked on overcoming said deficit. Might 42 be included in this publication?

thanks... I remember something from my childhood about drilling all the way to China.

Btw, I don't get the reference to "42." To me, 42 represents Jackie Robinson.

That, my good friend, IMNSHO, is exquisitely profound. Thank you very much. Perhaps you hit on the core (fundamental) reality of life that TWI misses by miles. We have observed, in much detail over the last two decades, that Wierwille built a subculture that was ALL about (narcissism?) ALWAYS being right. Yet, in all of his "scientific precision and mathematical exactness" we (GSC has) have volumes of first hand accounts of his meanness (which is NOT a fruit of the spirit), his licentiousness, etc.

It's likely both. Talking past each other is the opposite of active listening. People don't listen to what they don't want to hear.

YIKES!

That's similar to how most writers do it.

I figure the process is cathartic for you (more power to you for that), but the bottom line is that to get people to actually read your posts, you may have to decide which words, sentences and paragraphs are necessary and and which can be deleted to still get your main points across.

Truth!

They did marry. They have since divorced. They had two daughters. Sandy was 6th corps. She's on FB. Sorry, I only first saw your post now.

With study (and I believe you study stuff that will eventually lead you to some understanding), I believe it's available in a more literal sense to understand... but it's NOT reasoning that's behind it at all. It's other, very human, tendencies. Like tribalism and deep emotionalism. But very much is not any kind of logic or reasoning. I read people saying on social media that they can't understand the logic/reasoning behind certain political beliefs that are causing polarization and division all over the world these days. That's what spurred me to ask myself and in some of the experts' books that I've read similar questions. As a figure of speech however, I believe your question/statement is very TRUE and rational.

YESSSS!

It seems to me that Twinky was trying to get the point across that you were off the topic of this thread, which apparently, she started almost a decade ago.

An enlightening argument (for those with eyes to see and ears to hear) supporting your thesis.

I'm hoping your comment was tongue-in-cheek. I'm hoping we're well past taking the PFLAP advanced class as anything at all approaching a legitimate authority on truth.

At age 19, when I first was introduced to TWI, VPW, and PFLAP, I can say now with great confidence that I was grossly deficient in emotional and intellectual tools to immunize me from a fundamentalist Christian cult. Besides emotional immaturity and longing for belonging and for a more robust knowledge of spiritual realities, I had been raised in a culture steeped in Christian dogma and symbolism. If not for that cultural background, I could have been vulnerable to a wider range of cults.

There is plenty of literature on the subject now, including but not limited to: The Confidence Game Malignant Pied Pipers of our Time Undertow The Cult that Snapped Dark Persuasion Any book by Steven Hassan and several more. Key is that EVERY SINGLE HUMAN is subject to being conned. What constitutes and how to develop and foster critical thinking skill can be (and sometimes IS) taught in k-12 schools AND by/in families. Historical and cultural literacy is crucial background knowledge/understanding that can help immunize people young and old against (religious and political) cults.

I remember sitting with a 9th corpse gal at a meal one time, she told me of her aspirations to sleep with a man of god. At the time, I had no idea about the context. We will never know by direct disclosure by Vic, but we CAN draw reasonable inferences. IMO, it's not necessarily just your opinion.

Yes, something of that nature... shame and fear based emotional abuse to control followers... ... but Martindale was using the expression well before 1995. I left in 1986 and it was already firmly entrenched in the twi lexicon by that time.

Mike, Mike, Mike... Has anyone here at GSC considered your schtick to be "good sense or logic?" That ship sailed years ago. I don't claim to know or be able to discern what you "are thinking." I only know what you've written on GSC. IF you were to be "on the spectrum," and IF we understood your words in such context, it would be much easier to accept, or at least understand, your logic. Further, expressing, or responding with defensiveness doesn't necessarily suggest to your readers any strength resides in your arguments. OTOH, vulnerability DOES communicate strength and promotes connection/acceptance.