WordWolf

Wierwille took B.G. Leonard's definitions. Initially, he copied them word-for-word, but he quickly began changing the wording, making them more ponderous and less obviously plagiarized. (They were STILL plagiarized because changing the wording of something you plagiarized doesn't change how stolen it is, nor does it make this any less intentional. What it does is hide your tracks, and prove you knew it was wrong but tried to hide your sin and crime from others.) Since vpw didn't really understand Leonard's definitions, his changes didn't necessarily improve them in any way. He had a technical, intellectual understanding of them, it that. What he did NOT have was a practical understanding. So, he repeated what other people said who DID have a practical understanding. This strongly suggests that he'd heard all about them but had never EXPERIENCED them. In other words, in these subjects, he was a FRAUD, a FAKE, who PRETENDED he had done these things but had never performed any of them. Otherwise, he would have understood them better and have had first-hand knowledge of them other than observing other people. Furthermore, his technical understanding of them- that is, his understanding of them based on description and the words of those who had performed them- was not deep. Otherwise, when he made changes, he would have actually made the definitions clearer rather than simply making them more multisyllabic and sesquipedalian. What those accomplished was to hide the plagiarism better (it was still plagiarism) and to make it sound more as if he knew what he was talking about by pretending to make them more scholarly-sounding. All of this suggests strongly that a heavy study of what wierwille wrote and said on the subject won't bring you any closer than a cursory study of what he said. If there really is such a thing as an "expert" on this, it would be the late B.G. Leonard, who taught lots of people on this subject, and whom wierwille shamelessly plagiarized at great length. Right this moment, it seems as if the website for "CTC of Texas" is down, but that would be the place to look. His "Gifts of the Spirit" class- still available on recording, if I understand correctly- is what wierwille plagiarized in its entirety when he presented "his" class on "Receiving the Holy Spirit Today." Word for word, this class was the same as Leonard's class. He taught it a few months after taking Leonard's class. It had no syllabus and no charts other than a blackboard. When he taught that class, he asked Leonard permission to reteach Leonard's class one time locally since Leonard could not be everywhere. Leonard agreed. What vpw told the class was, that this was vpw's class, and gave it a different name. At the end, he took a class photo and mailed it to Leonard, who considered the matter closed at the time. vpw then continued to teach the same class, never telling Leonard, continuing to plagiarize Leonard, and continuing to claim he himself was the sole originator of that class. Later, he padded it out with more material from Leonard's other classes, and with J.E. Stiles' book "GIfts of the Holy Spirit", material from E.W. Bullinger (like "How to Enjoy the Bible) and changed more phrasings, and added more stories, eventually constructing the 3 PFAL classes from plagiarizing those sources and hiding his actions by rearranging the contents. By doing this all locally, and avoiding all official notice, he was able to hide how completely "his" class ripped off his sources. (Anyone who doubts this can check a copy of Bullinger's book, and see how much of sessions 5-8 are lifted directly from "How to Enjoy the Bible.") Wierwille ripped off some other books of Bullinger. If you look at the list of all the references to "holy spirit" in the Bible, you look at something lifted directly from Bullinger's book on the Spirit. (And so on, and so on.) Some people claim- completely erroneously- that what vpw did was NOT plagiarism. By any sensible definition of plagiarism, it was plagiarism. He knew it was wrong- they'd said so in school, and he'd gone to actual schools all the way through getting his Master's degree. He tried to hide what he'd done, so we know he was aware of it. We know he claimed he was the sole source in the class and in the books of the class. Dissenting voices claim that his occasional comments on tape when not in the classes of learning from other people count as properly citing his sources. if he'd meant it, he would have failed pitifully to have accomplished this. However, he never claimed anything of the kind. He claimed he learned from other people, then worked it on his own, "and got the error out." When we all study, we all learn from other people, but we don't all plagiarize. Furthermore, if you find, somehow, a copy of the book, "the Way-Living in Love", buried somewhere about a hundred pages in is a passing comment he made that "nothing I teach is original" and that the original part was "putting together" the class. Supposedly, this also counts as citing his sources. Again, this is a pitiful attempt to smokescreen the issue. vpw meant for everyone to think he'd learned some things from other people, then went off and completely reworked what they taught, with God Almighty at his shoulder, and the result was what was in the classes. He implied as much all through the classes, he insinuated as much all through the classes. He gave himself some wiggle-room to allow for plausible deniability. That way, if he was caught, he could back-pedal and pretend he never meant for us to believe he really did that. Ever hear vpw was a basketball player on the Sheboygan Redskins? Well, technically, vpw INSINUATED he played on the team. His exact wording was he was "INVOLVED WITH" them. People all came away with the idea that he claimed he was a player. A check of the complete list of players that ever played for the team showed his name was missing. In other words, he never played for them. But he would have claimed- if anyone had caught him- that he never said he did. What he did was phrase things DECEPTIVELY to get people to believe he had said so outright, but he left himself an out. That's the kind of behavior one sees from a serial liar, from someone who is a complete fraud from start to finish, from someone who spends all his time deceiving people. He was caught lying occasionally, and his back-pedals were fascinating, and at least one has been documented and discussed here and elsewhere. So, all of that is to say, if there's anything to learn on the subject, look up B.G. Leonard, look up his "GIfts of the Spirit" class, and look up his books. When the CTC of Texas website is back up, look at them, also.

Allan Konigsberg.

That's it.

This is a well-known show. There have been versions of this show made in other countries. (There have been a dozen different versions of the show, other than the original.) The original series is a US show that has been around for over 35 seasons. It is not a scripted show. The original show is a show where knowing other languages is not required, but can be very useful. Having a good memory and physical acumen are also useful. Also, where a show like Survivor has you trying to be the last one standing, this show has you trying to be one of TWO people winning. Strictly speaking, you wouldn't be trying to be the only ones finishing, you'd try to be the FIRST ones finishing, because speed counts, and other teams are likely to finish also. What's the name of this spectacular show?

And I'd heard "TDKR" was a bad movie, so I didn't bother with it.

That's it.

It IS a Genesis song, and I'll consider that close enough, since I think you're thinking of the correct song. This was Genesis' big #1 hit, "INVISIBLE TOUCH." (The previous song was "Land of Confusion." I remember the video getting a LOT of airplay.) Your turn!

"I'm your wife." *BLAM* "Consider dat a divorce."

Ah, was that "In the Heat of the Night"?????

"Well, I've been waiting. Waiting here so long. But thinking nothing Nothing could go wrong. Ooh now I know She has a built-in ability To take everything she sees. And now it seems I'm falling Falling for her."

Which means it's GEORGE's turn.

This is a well-known show. There have been versions of this show made in other countries. (There have been a dozen different versions of the show, other than the original.) The original series is a US show that has been around for over 35 seasons. It is not a scripted show. The original show is a show where knowing other languages is not required, but can be very useful. Having a good memory and physical acumen are also useful. Also, where a show like Survivor has you trying to be the last one standing, this show has you trying to be one of TWO people winning.

OK, same artist, different song. "Well, I've been waiting, Waiting here so long, But thinking nothing, Nothing could go wrong. Ooh now I know"

Phil Silvers It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World Buddy Hackett

Since "Survivor" has contestants out away from people, I'm not sure other languages would ever be useful.

"Especially at night, I worry over situations, I know will be all right. It's just OVERKILL." Men at Work with "OVERKILL." I really thought he was going too easy when he went with the same band.

I think we're all drawing a blank here.

Bob Barker has been very, very vocal about having all pets spayed or neutered, and vocal about animal rights in general. Thus the line "I say we neuter him right now. Give him the Bob Barker treatment!" So, you have it.

I'd like to try something different for this round. If it's judged off-topic, let me know, but I think it won't be difficult. "The price of fashion should not be cruelty." "Help control the pet population. Have your pets spayed or neutered." "You have all overbid."

OK, next one. This is a well-known show. There have been versions of this show made in other countries. (There have been a dozen different versions of the show, other than the original.) The original series is a US show that has been around for over 35 seasons. It is not a scripted show. The original show is a show where knowing other languages is not required, but can be very useful. Having a good memory and physical acumen are also useful.

I had a vague recollection that Anthony Michael Hall did a show with that name, based on the book. Ok, next one, let me think...

Dick Van Dyke Chitty Chitty Bang Babg Desmon Llewelyn

Yes. Did I accidentally quote the sequel? Sorry!

That would be, and it is!

" I just wanna tell you both: good luck. We're all counting on you." " I just wanna tell you both: good luck. We're all counting on you." " I just wanna tell you both: good luck. We're all counting on you." "What was it we had for dinner tonight?" "Well, we had a choice of steak or fish." "Yes, yes, I remember, I had lasagna." "Bet, babe. Slide a piece o' da' porter. Drinks, I run da' java." "Lookie here. I can dig grease 'n chompin' on some buns and draggin' through the garden." "Tell me everything that's happened so far." "Well, first the earth cooled. Then the dinosaurs came. But they got too big and fat, so they died and turned into oil. And then the Arabs came, and they bought Mercedes-Benz'es..."[/b]