I got tricked. I obeyed the man of god by going to college. rather than getting blessed, as promiced, I have a $50,000 loan I owe the government and no idea how I'm going to pay it off.
consider yourself lucky
when I pass from this world.. they will figure out some way to infiltrate the after-life to collect from me as well..
might be a running joke with me.. but I think they've figured it out. Find an absolute Devil of a student loan collector, and an absolute Saint. Give them both strict orders to collect from me, before shooting both of them in the head..
Anyway.. welcome to the Cafe.. I hope the service here is pleasant..
*waiter, waiter.. forget the coffee. a glass of Merlot for my friend..*..
From the get-go, the whole believing is recieving schtick is bull. I think just in the last few years I've proven that a couple hundred times.
Amen!
This awful doctrine pins extra burden on the person who is having troubles and essentially blames the victim, so to speak. God is not a formula. Believing equals receiving takes the relationship aspect right out of Christianity and replaces it with second grade math. They run their supporting logic along the lines of "God is sovereign and perfect, the word just works, therefore if something is not happening then it must be your believing."
Of all the devilish doctrines the way international promotes this one could be a contender for the top spot. I went through sheer hell trying to reconcile my child's health issues that developed in the womb with my believing. I cannot put into words the consternation I lived through trying to believe for his health. I always blamed myself and in fact I still deal with the mental residue of this teaching.
Believing is faith which is simple trust. We learn to trust God and Christ. That what it means to have faith. If you follow the way international's logic the person believing is the one who fulfills the promises in the bible. The bible teaches that God fulfills his promises since he is the one who made them. We are to learn to have faith in God to fulfill his Word and take care of his people.
Can you tell I finally have a little peace on the subject now?
Welcome to GSC Socrates, and this is just my perspective, I welcome yours - even if it's different from mine.
Nice to meet you. Yeah, I tend to agree with you that the believing = receiving is an overtly simple fallacy of a life principle as opposed to something that is real. Believing = a mental exercise is more what it is in the context of what they are talking about. Or believing is just something that describes the underlying principles of how I make decisions and live my life.
It doesn't solve the innate problem of death and taxes for example. Also - food, clothing, shelter, transportation - I think those involve a scramble a lot of times. I mean I guess homeless people have some of those, but most of us struggle in a similar fashion to what you describe in this life.
In the early days of the PFAL class, the "law" of believing, was called the "magic" of believing. (The original collateral was even titled that way.) That's because it's not (and never was) a "law". It's fantasy. You can't change physical realities with the power of thought. Try to levitate a table sometime with your mind. Good luck. Wierwille hitched his wagon to the new age thinking that was prevalent at the time and slapped a few Bible verses on the cover to give it an air of holiness. Consider, if you will, Norman Vincent Peale and his "Power of Positive Thinking". It's mumbo jumbo. I personally know of people who literally died trying to prove that the "law" of believing works. Read the L.E.A.D thread sometime to get an idea of how, needlessly, people suffered because they bought into this nonsense. Where we differ from the new phenomenon of The Secret is that we combined this stuff with glossolalia, or speaking in tongues, if you prefer, which reduces one's abilty to question and exercise critical thinking skills.
So_crates. same story, different people and circumstances. I like the line where you said, "Everyone in the building had a car except the one that put his trust in God". Not that I disagree with putting one's trust in God.
I remember reading the Blue Book. I believe I read that book hundreds of times. Every time I would go through a tough time I would pull out that book, "to get back to the basics". One time I was reading it and it dawned on me that the principle of "focus, let in the light of the Word, shoot the picture", did not address any problems I was having in my life. In fact, this "law" assumes everything is o.k. within me, and in order to be fulfilled, I need to manipulate my environment to my liking.
The truth is, everything is NOT okay within me, and that is where I need help.
It's also a misnomer to think that having one's material world in order creates fulfillment; it does not. Don't get me wrong, I still believe in prayer and in trusting God. But to think that we can have it all just by imagining our desired result is, as you say, a very destructive belief.
Recommended Posts
waysider
Hey, there, So_crates.
Welcome to our little cyber greasy spoon.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
Welcome So Crates..
consider yourself lucky
when I pass from this world.. they will figure out some way to infiltrate the after-life to collect from me as well..
might be a running joke with me.. but I think they've figured it out. Find an absolute Devil of a student loan collector, and an absolute Saint. Give them both strict orders to collect from me, before shooting both of them in the head..
Anyway.. welcome to the Cafe.. I hope the service here is pleasant..
*waiter, waiter.. forget the coffee. a glass of Merlot for my friend..*..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
I'm workin' on it!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldSkool
Amen!
This awful doctrine pins extra burden on the person who is having troubles and essentially blames the victim, so to speak. God is not a formula. Believing equals receiving takes the relationship aspect right out of Christianity and replaces it with second grade math. They run their supporting logic along the lines of "God is sovereign and perfect, the word just works, therefore if something is not happening then it must be your believing."
Of all the devilish doctrines the way international promotes this one could be a contender for the top spot. I went through sheer hell trying to reconcile my child's health issues that developed in the womb with my believing. I cannot put into words the consternation I lived through trying to believe for his health. I always blamed myself and in fact I still deal with the mental residue of this teaching.
Believing is faith which is simple trust. We learn to trust God and Christ. That what it means to have faith. If you follow the way international's logic the person believing is the one who fulfills the promises in the bible. The bible teaches that God fulfills his promises since he is the one who made them. We are to learn to have faith in God to fulfill his Word and take care of his people.
Can you tell I finally have a little peace on the subject now?
Welcome to GSC Socrates, and this is just my perspective, I welcome yours - even if it's different from mine.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chockfull
So_crates,
Nice to meet you. Yeah, I tend to agree with you that the believing = receiving is an overtly simple fallacy of a life principle as opposed to something that is real. Believing = a mental exercise is more what it is in the context of what they are talking about. Or believing is just something that describes the underlying principles of how I make decisions and live my life.
It doesn't solve the innate problem of death and taxes for example. Also - food, clothing, shelter, transportation - I think those involve a scramble a lot of times. I mean I guess homeless people have some of those, but most of us struggle in a similar fashion to what you describe in this life.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
In the early days of the PFAL class, the "law" of believing, was called the "magic" of believing. (The original collateral was even titled that way.) That's because it's not (and never was) a "law". It's fantasy. You can't change physical realities with the power of thought. Try to levitate a table sometime with your mind. Good luck. Wierwille hitched his wagon to the new age thinking that was prevalent at the time and slapped a few Bible verses on the cover to give it an air of holiness. Consider, if you will, Norman Vincent Peale and his "Power of Positive Thinking". It's mumbo jumbo. I personally know of people who literally died trying to prove that the "law" of believing works. Read the L.E.A.D thread sometime to get an idea of how, needlessly, people suffered because they bought into this nonsense. Where we differ from the new phenomenon of The Secret is that we combined this stuff with glossolalia, or speaking in tongues, if you prefer, which reduces one's abilty to question and exercise critical thinking skills.
Edited by waysiderLink to comment
Share on other sites
Human without the bean
Welcome So_crates. Those old WM chiche's are really out there aren't they.
Kick your feet up and enjoy your stay!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Broken Arrow
So_crates. same story, different people and circumstances. I like the line where you said, "Everyone in the building had a car except the one that put his trust in God". Not that I disagree with putting one's trust in God.
I remember reading the Blue Book. I believe I read that book hundreds of times. Every time I would go through a tough time I would pull out that book, "to get back to the basics". One time I was reading it and it dawned on me that the principle of "focus, let in the light of the Word, shoot the picture", did not address any problems I was having in my life. In fact, this "law" assumes everything is o.k. within me, and in order to be fulfilled, I need to manipulate my environment to my liking.
The truth is, everything is NOT okay within me, and that is where I need help.
It's also a misnomer to think that having one's material world in order creates fulfillment; it does not. Don't get me wrong, I still believe in prayer and in trusting God. But to think that we can have it all just by imagining our desired result is, as you say, a very destructive belief.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
year2027
God-Serent-Jesus-Self-Christ-god being or kind
thanks So_crates
welcome new friend
as one reads the bible one see that those lies are only truth
but the promise is not for today
because all die
but the next stage of life
what before?
what next?
but the bible is nothing but a vain book
The book of Luke is not even in the bible
but Genesis is not too
what we have?
with love and a holy kiss Roy
Edited by year2027Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.