waysider

What?---one had two pages of mainly scripture references and the other had 36 pages. Sounds like a different class to me. I suggest you start a new thread and explain why one needed 2 pages and the other needed 36 if they were identical. Better yet, let's leave it here and descend into a quibble over how many pages the syllabus had while completely ignoring the content of the class being discussed.

Were you personally present for the staging of that class? I submit that what we are discussing here is a class called Christian Family and Sex, that was presented in the field for the typical student of the PFAL series of classes, not a special version presented to the Corps. Hence, though the titles may be the same, they are not really the same class. Although, if you wish to discuss specifics of that particular version you might very well wish to start a separate thread to do so.

Care to share a sampling of said document? Surely there must be something that could be shared from a document that lengthy. BTW----We are speaking of the class in a generalized and larger sense here, not isolating a particular version that was only presented to a small fraction of the TWI populace.

Your experience certainly conflicts with my memory as a class instructor. The syllabus was, as stated, 2 or 3 pages, at best. There was no "final exam". There was, however, a questionnaire that asked explicit and personal questions about the student's sexual experiences.

Outstanding performance. :eusa_clap:

Curiosity got the better of me so I googled it. :asdf: Excellent tune, Mr. Moose!

I prefer this variation from Monty Python:

"Grease spot on the road" is an old truckers expression describing someone who pulled into the path of a semi without regard for the amount of time it takes to bring a rig to a halt. I have no idea about the "by midnight" part.

At the risk of sounding rude, let me clearly state that your response is nothing short of a deliberate effort to avoid the issue. If you think it would be a derailment or require a lengthy response, though I can't image how a response to one simple paragraph could be too lengthy, the proper thing to do is start another thread to specifically deal with that subject. One would think after all these years of posting, that would be fairly obvious to you.

Hi Notta What I was always told was that if you had something going on that would prevent you from "getting your numbers" (meeting quota) you shouldn't even bother coming to work. Of course, with labor unions being a faded page in the history books, there is really no one to stop such practices.

I have worked at jobs like that, especially logistics (warehouse) jobs where everything is timed down to the tenth of a second. No one will tell you you can't use the restroom but once you do, no matter how quick you are, your chances of meeting quota are like the old "snowball in hell" saying. Same goes for getting a drink of water or stopping to tie your shoes.

I don't feel like I have tried to distract you or insult you. If I have, I apologize. Now that page 14 of GMWD (still don't understand why it's not just GMW) is "on the table" perhaps you could elaborate a bit more specifically.

Mike If I understand you correctly, you are saying that the two admonitions only seem to conflict because revelation was given to change the original (admonition). You are further bolstering your argument by citing two of the "Keys To Walking By The Spirit" from page 10 of the AC syllabus. Those two keys are: 13. Revelation once given may change (God changes the revelation after the circumstances change) 14. Revelation given twice is established. First and foremost, even though scripture references were given to confirm these keys, they are never presented as such anywhere in the Bible/Word/Scriptures or whatever verbiage you choose to use. Secondly, wierwille says these "tremendous spiritual truths" are hidden in THIS psalm, Psalm 103, not the PFAL texts or writings of wierwille. But what would I know? I never really looked at this stuff before. <_<

Ok---I think I figured out what GMWD is. Is it God's Magnified Word? I'm looking at page 14 right now. It's the first page of chapter 2 and is titled "The Benefits Of God". "Psalm 103 is a tremendous example of knowledge and praise. Just the reading of it thrills the heart of anyone who loves God. The beauty with which this is set just from a human point of view, without even thinking of its spiritual impact, should set at peace the soul of any man or woman. For us as born-again believers there are tremendous spiritual truths hidden in this psalm that will elevate and enrich our lives as we learn them." Then it goes on to cite Psalm 103:1-4. So what is the great mystery/truth/treasure you propose is being revealed here?

I thought my request was quite reasonable. What is GMWD? What is on page 14 that you wish to call attention to?

Refresh my memory. What is GMWD? Can you be more specific about what is on page 14? (I doubt I have a copy to reference)

Perhaps you could bring one of those fine points (or one of the finer details) "to the table", as you say. If it helps it make more sense, I would think you would be eager to do so.

Any of you guys or gals familiar with Charlie Musselwhite, the harmonica player? He has an amp for sale. It's an HG 30. That's a HarpGear amp set up specifically for harp. It's a 30W tube amp and has (2) 8" speakers. He'll even autograph it if you want. If it sounds like something that interests you, shoot me a PM.

In the May/June1979 issue of the Way Magazine the Our Times article by Dr titled “How the Word Works” talked about mastering the Word. In that same issue was the main article titled “Masters of the Word.” In that Our Times article we read: "At these occasions, the years of Biblical research I have spent come back to my mind, and joy wells up inside me as I think of what is available to you today through The Way Ministry in book and magazine form, setting forth the accuracy of God’s Word. This research took me years to work out, and now you can see the depth of it in just a few short hours of reading. Any person who works this material will have a fantastic opportunity to see how the Word works." ********************************** Call Now!! Operators are standing by!! HELLO?? It's a stinkin' commercial plug, for gosh sakes!

Say huh? :blink:

Wasn't it common for believers to refer to something as "being from the pit (of hell)", "from the adversary", "from the devil", etc.? So which was it? Did the subject being referred to come from a spiritual entity (the adversary) or from a figurative location (the pit)? I submit the essence being conveyed was synonymous whichever way it was stated.

What exactly is the point of this thread?

waysider said: It's a crime? I wasn't aware our laws apply in French controlled territories. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WD replied: Yes it is a crime QUOTE The French Embassy in Washington, D.C., issued a written statement condemning the use of dogs as shark bait, emphasizing that such acts are illegal and will not be tolerated in the French territory. Again I never said our laws applied anywhere that is your assumption. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- waysider replied: I never assumed our laws applied either. And they don't. If you want me to agree that animal cruelty is appalling, you got it. But please don't fudge my words to make it appear as if I said something that I didn't. Criminality is relative to the jurisdiction where it occurs.

Yes, accuracy is important. Sometimes it requires going beyond the simply stated and exploring the veiled implications.