Nathan_Jr
Members-
Posts
3,222 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
82
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by Nathan_Jr
-
In Search of Historic Jesus
Nathan_Jr replied to Raf's topic in Atheism, nontheism, skepticism: Questioning Faith
Perfect. Brevity is all I can expect. Thank you. I get the point. I am suspicious of Paul for many reasons, bragging about not getting his evangelon from the apostles being one of them. And he admits to lying, if that's what it takes to get converts. I can't remember his position. Does Carrier argue that the Testimonium Flavianum is a complete forgery? Or partially forged? -
In Search of Historic Jesus
Nathan_Jr replied to Raf's topic in Atheism, nontheism, skepticism: Questioning Faith
Though I haven’t read Cartier, I am familiar with him and others (Price, Avalos…) through lectures, debates and discussions on the inter webs. Would you please expound on this sentence? I am increasingly of the belief that there was no historic Jesus, and that if there had been, Paul would never have succeeded as his most influential apostle. -
Take a number. Here's one. 1463. There are 1462 unanswered questions ahead of yours. ======= Truth is not afraid of being questioned. Hate is born of fear. victor and LCM hated being questioned. When I say hated, I mean they HATED being questioned. Just listen to the tapes or read the transcripts. The accuracy of the evidence of their fear fits like a...
-
The school bus is merely apparent. When viewed accurately, it's a scientifically precise motor coach. Accuracy is about MAKING something fit, especially when it doesn't. I wish you could see it in the original.
-
The question as to why victor chose Loy has been explored and discussed many, many times over the years right here on this discussion board, GSC. Though the answer is multi-faceted, one important factor is victor paul wierwille lacked the requisite in-depth spiritual perception and awareness. (Oh, how I've missed you, Irony... been gone too long.)
-
Right, I get it. I've read the accounts. I was pointing to the hypocrisy, the doctrinal and spiritual dishonesty, the bullshonta. I know. The hypocrisy wasn't the worst part. It was the raping.
-
Ha! Not necessarily. I've read those stories right here in this café. My questions were rhetorical.
-
Why would a THE man of god need a security detail? Why couldn’t he just beleeeve big enough for his own security? After all, he beleeeved big enough to provide for national security - if it weren’t for his beleeeviing, the Soviets would have attacked the U.S.
-
This must have been pre-LCM. Didn’t he hate gays with the same passion as Westboro?
-
Why would such a charlatan need shielding from sunlight?
-
What was Westboro protesting?
-
Have some self respect. You are Mr. God. That’s accuracy and precision as it hasn’t been known since…
-
Did I mention I’m trilingual in speaking in tongues? Both hypothetically AND actually. I’ve spoken in three different tongues at least twice. So, it’s established.
-
If one has the impression that the data is not 100% correct, the website offers a way to submit corrections. https://www.cultfacts.com/contact-us
-
We have the right to choose to pay attention to this. Just look at it. See it for all that it explicitly and implicitly means. Whose brittle ears are we choosing to protect from offense by reporting "sexual assault" instead of rape for the glory of Allah?
-
Everyone, including myself.
-
It’s a peculiar stylistic choice. I can appreciate the spectrum of crimes captured by “sexual assault.” I can see a potential utility there, but often the stylistic choice misleads and minimizes. In Israel on October 7, many (dozens? hundreds?) of girls and women were raped by Islamic jihadists. Some were raped to death. Read that again. Raped. To. Death! But many journalists reported "sexual assault" on Israeli girls and women. There are contexts where this stylistic choice moves beyond frustratingly ambiguous to dishonest vulgarity. We need to make better choices.
-
I really despise these euphemisms, but charlatans and criminals wouldn’t leave the house without them. The media seems to have normalized this linguistic apologetic by referring to rape as sexual assault, which is easier on the conscience, I guess. Hearing or reading about rape is supposed to make people uncomfortable. Euphemisms are anesthetic.
-
Though it has yet to be written, except in the stars, the revelation has been established (2nd time did it): If victor paul wierwille had only learned how (H-O-W) to believe big enough to live long enough, he would have fellated that TRUMPet while squatting over and defecating into the mouth of God. Enjoy it while you can.