Raf

it was. These were borderline "songs remembered from just one line" clues.

yes. I was distracted by her... filmography

Let me know if you need the rest of the script, since I have it nearly memorized. Dubuque? Des Moines.

More classic than that. I wanna say Streetcar Named Desire

JLW is correct

Hey baby, let's keep in touch

nope

Heartbreakers The Tuxedo Tropic Thunder Garfield

Perhaps I've grown a little cynical.

The accurate Ghostbusters quote is "He slimed me."

ok, the ag was a typo. but I thought ah ah ah ah was too blatant a hint. The Immigrant Song, Led Zeppelin

It would probably take an eternity to figure out which franchise movie it is.

Really? No one? Christopher Reeve

ah ah ah ag

Short role. I see what you did there. How was the coffee? Good? City's best? Or damn fine?

Ok, not gonna hold this up: Bruce Wayne Jack Ryan Bartleby the fallen angel

actually, free post

undoubtedly. Don't wait. I'll confirm it for you. Your move/

After the June solstice or December?

Characters: Phil Knight Holden McNeill Tony Mendez Rudy Duncan

Those last two settled it, but I am very proud of you for not including the candidate. Greg Stillson. Emilio Estevez Sr.aka Martin Sheen.

Back in the High Life by Steve Winwood. Miller uses it in the commercial, naturally

Any thread where I'm up is free post if you haven't done it already

Yes, killing the competition and erasing historical evidence of their existence does tend to stack the deck in favor of orthodoxy.

As I was raised Jehovah's Witness, I never believed in the Trinity. Jehovah's Witnesses, unlike the Way, really did draw their theology from Arianism, a theology with a lengthy history and lots of scholarship behind it. I find it intriguing that Bart Ehrman, the former fundamentalist-turned-Bible-scholar-turned-agnostic (and still a Bible scholar) now believes Arianism best reflects the belief of the first century church. Not that he is the final authority on anything, but I find his position interesting because he has nothing to gain from it. It's just what he believes is the best reflection of the available evidence. I think Wierwille's presentation was a joke. It was a work of non-scholarship, the intellectual equivalent of a Chick Tract without the subtlety. Anthony Buzzard's book on the development of the Trinity doctrine is a far superior presentation of Wierwille's position, as was the CES book One God and One Lord (which dishonestly omits Wierwille's book as a source). As for me, my position is completely irrelevant. I merely believe the Trinitarian position won out, became dominant, and successfully cast all opposing positions as the work of the devil, which is hardly an invitation to honest discourse. I believe some of the earliest Christians believed Jesus is God. I also believe others did not. I believe these competing claims (together will all the other early church heresies) reflect the fact that the stories of Jesus and his deeds and his teachings and his claims were quite simply made up decades after they allegedly took place. It's actually the best explanation for the intense division in the early church, IMO.