Administration/dispensationalism is a false doctrine incorporated into Christianity by John nelson Darby. I mention it here in light of the Canon cause u said it best Waysider!
It seems contradictory to say one leaves no stone unturned while at the same time refusing to check out hyperlinks that address the topic - and of all things asking another person to summarize the data of those links for them.
Seems like a lazy person’s way of getting others to leave no stone unturned.
I don’t want to be nitpicking in a doctrinal discussion but it really is comical when someone gripes about others not examining their own “postulates” when that’s exactly what they do.
It reminds me of another thread where the same person went on about how critical thinking was so overrated.
Does anyone have an opinion on the Book of Enoch? The most recent film Noah illustrates "The Watchers" or the (Nephilim). Haven't studied it, but here's a page on it:
Does anyone have an opinion on the Book of Enoch? The most recent film Noah illustrates "The Watchers" or the (Nephilim). Haven't studied it, but here's a page on it:
I've read most of it and have a digital copy...same with Book of Adam and Eve. I haven't given too much thought if it's God-breathed or not but it definitely will broaden ones perspective.
Administration/dispensationalism is a false doctrine incorporated into Christianity by John nelson Darby. I mention it here in light of the Canon cause u said it best Waysider!
Funny. I've never seen this in the Word.
Does this mean you don't want to see it in the Word.
BTW, did you see what I said in the other thread about the canon?
I'm waiting for people to read 2 short Epistles so we can get this ball rolling.
What does GOD say about this canon stuff?
Does anyone want to know?
It seems contradictory to say one leaves no stone unturned while at the same time refusing to check out hyperlinks that address the topic - and of all things asking another person to summarize the data of those links for them.
Seems like a lazy person’s way of getting others to leave no stone unturned.
It would seem that way to me, if I was too lazy to read what my opponent was saying.
I said I already checked that approach out, and I see the damage it did to you, plain as day, so why should I un-turn that stone again? Unless I wanted to damage myself like you seemed to have done. Hey! I feel for you. I'll be here to help you when that approach runs dry and leaves you stranded in unbelief.
I don’t want to be nitpicking in a doctrinal discussion but it really is comical when someone gripes about others not examining their own “postulates” when that’s exactly what they do.
It reminds me of another thread where the same person went on about how critical thinking was so overrated.
Yes, I have more than once celebrated the benefits of a closed mind, when the conditions are right. It is not a popular idea in this day of opening up to all error.
Trust me, I could "go off" on this topic a LOT more than I did with you a day or so ago.
It looks to me that you really don't want to see what the Word says about the canon.
It looks like you also forgot about the times and years when I experimented with my Postulates a lot. I don't think you have thought about this enough to tell me your fundamental Postulates are at this minute, except moan and grown about your anti-idol.
You can't turn a stone over when you're standing on it.
You got THAT right!
Did you get it yet right yer, that I have had extensive experiences, some of which I detailed here, of when I actually DID un-turn your favored stone of stone-hearted theology, that rivals the Pharisees?
Aren't you the slightest bit curious about what I saw in the Word, in the raw KJV, as I looked for ten solid years?
How does exploring when the books of the Bible were written and how the “Bible” was canonized make one an unbeliever?
Good question.
I will say this much: westcott and hort we're unbelievers who believed in evolution and did not believe in the atoning works of Jesus Christ. They were not honest in how they put their version together either.
Does anyone have an opinion on the Book of Enoch? The most recent film Noah illustrates "The Watchers" or the (Nephilim). Haven't studied it, but here's a page on it:
I will say this much: westcott and hort we're unbelievers who believed in evolution and did not believe in the atoning works of Jesus Christ. They were not honest in how they put their version together either.
You seem to be under the allusion that the devil (not Satan) is like Dracula with crucifixes, and stays far away from Bible scholars. Just the opposite it true. He whispers into those open ears all the time. That is where he hobbles good Christians from finding the power in Christ that resides within. He blew it, not knowing the Mystery, so now he has all these believers with Christ-in and the potential to beat him at every turn like Jesus did. So what does he do? He steers the churches to become prisons.
Did you know that the devil can whisper in YOUR ear, and make it sound like a good idea of your own, or a revelation from the True God?
We were taught that, and taught that often. I wonder if you remember.
There is one collateral where VPW teaches that TEN TIMES on just a few pages.
I understand the expression “you are what you eat” to mean it is important to get good food in order to maintain health. Metaphorically cognitive skills are part of one’s “digestive system” . I did “eat” a lot of bad stuff for 12 years of following wierwille. Besides indigestion that led to a lot of constipation too - and some bad gas. …and sleep disorders during PFAL classes. …
I’m into “unprocessed food “ now - I’ll leave the processing to my cognitive skills department.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
199
126
90
153
Popular Days
Oct 17
109
Oct 11
87
Oct 15
69
Oct 10
54
Top Posters In This Topic
Mike 199 posts
T-Bone 126 posts
OldSkool 90 posts
Nathan_Jr 153 posts
Popular Days
Oct 17 2022
109 posts
Oct 11 2022
87 posts
Oct 15 2022
69 posts
Oct 10 2022
54 posts
Popular Posts
Twinky
I haven't been following this thread but had a peek. This whole thread is absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the canon of scripture. But I did note the following, originally posted by our
waysider
Ahhh, those were the days.
waysider
Bake 'em away, toys.
Posted Images
OldSkool
Administration/dispensationalism is a false doctrine incorporated into Christianity by John nelson Darby. I mention it here in light of the Canon cause u said it best Waysider!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
It seems contradictory to say one leaves no stone unturned while at the same time refusing to check out hyperlinks that address the topic - and of all things asking another person to summarize the data of those links for them.
Seems like a lazy person’s way of getting others to leave no stone unturned.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
I don’t want to be nitpicking in a doctrinal discussion but it really is comical when someone gripes about others not examining their own “postulates” when that’s exactly what they do.
It reminds me of another thread where the same person went on about how critical thinking was so overrated.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
You can't turn a stone over when you're standing on it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldiesman
Does anyone have an opinion on the Book of Enoch? The most recent film Noah illustrates "The Watchers" or the (Nephilim). Haven't studied it, but here's a page on it:
The Prophet Enoch (heartscenter.org)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldSkool
I've read most of it and have a digital copy...same with Book of Adam and Eve. I haven't given too much thought if it's God-breathed or not but it definitely will broaden ones perspective.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
Funny. I've never seen this in the Word.
Does this mean you don't want to see it in the Word.
BTW, did you see what I said in the other thread about the canon?
I'm waiting for people to read 2 short Epistles so we can get this ball rolling.
What does GOD say about this canon stuff?
Does anyone want to know?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
It would seem that way to me, if I was too lazy to read what my opponent was saying.
I said I already checked that approach out, and I see the damage it did to you, plain as day, so why should I un-turn that stone again? Unless I wanted to damage myself like you seemed to have done. Hey! I feel for you. I'll be here to help you when that approach runs dry and leaves you stranded in unbelief.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
Yes, I have more than once celebrated the benefits of a closed mind, when the conditions are right. It is not a popular idea in this day of opening up to all error.
Trust me, I could "go off" on this topic a LOT more than I did with you a day or so ago.
It looks to me that you really don't want to see what the Word says about the canon.
It looks like you also forgot about the times and years when I experimented with my Postulates a lot. I don't think you have thought about this enough to tell me your fundamental Postulates are at this minute, except moan and grown about your anti-idol.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
How does exploring when the books of the Bible were written and how the “Bible” was canonized make one an unbeliever?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldSkool
Mike...nobody wants to talk about you on this thread.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
You got THAT right!
Did you get it yet right yer, that I have had extensive experiences, some of which I detailed here, of when I actually DID un-turn your favored stone of stone-hearted theology, that rivals the Pharisees?
Aren't you the slightest bit curious about what I saw in the Word, in the raw KJV, as I looked for ten solid years?
Maybe someone is. I can wait.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldSkool
Good question.
I will say this much: westcott and hort we're unbelievers who believed in evolution and did not believe in the atoning works of Jesus Christ. They were not honest in how they put their version together either.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
What's new about that?
You just want to talk AT me.
Where did that song link go?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Edited by Nathan_JrLet it snow, let it snow, let it snow...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
I would hazard a guess that Jesus never referred to it, or acted it out. Ditto for the NT writers in the KJV's canon.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
How's your reading of those 2 short Epistles coming?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
You are what you eat.
The mentors you trust are aimed at unbelief, just like your posts to me are aimed at that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
I read them. They say nothing about how the Bible was put together.
What do you beleeve they say about making a Bible?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldSkool
Don't expect him to do anything but troll, disrupt, and derail. I'm moving onto the topic without addressing his wierwillian doctrines.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike
You seem to be under the allusion that the devil (not Satan) is like Dracula with crucifixes, and stays far away from Bible scholars. Just the opposite it true. He whispers into those open ears all the time. That is where he hobbles good Christians from finding the power in Christ that resides within. He blew it, not knowing the Mystery, so now he has all these believers with Christ-in and the potential to beat him at every turn like Jesus did. So what does he do? He steers the churches to become prisons.
Did you know that the devil can whisper in YOUR ear, and make it sound like a good idea of your own, or a revelation from the True God?
We were taught that, and taught that often. I wonder if you remember.
There is one collateral where VPW teaches that TEN TIMES on just a few pages.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan_Jr
Wierwillian ≈ Orwellian
mmmm... yum
Link to comment
Share on other sites
T-Bone
I understand the expression “you are what you eat” to mean it is important to get good food in order to maintain health. Metaphorically cognitive skills are part of one’s “digestive system” . I did “eat” a lot of bad stuff for 12 years of following wierwille. Besides indigestion that led to a lot of constipation too - and some bad gas.
…and sleep disorders during PFAL classes. 
…
I’m into “unprocessed food “ now - I’ll leave the processing to my cognitive skills department.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.