chockfull

I’m with you on this. My faith message needs to be short enough so I don’t get lost explaining it.

I’m getting to her testimony but dear baby Jesus on a pogo stick they have more “woke” labels starting out that podcast than I can even concentrate on. Hopefully that won’t obscure her message. Well she seems to talk all around the topic as opposed to addressing the commonly held definitions of Christianity. Jesus and John Wayne seems to attack the male image in religion - the topic seems more “wokism” than “faith” regardless of the truth of male dominated organizations. I agree with her sentiments on feeling the need to prove her background and views especially labels like “Calvinist”. Christianity to me is from the heart and judged by God not some kind of 90 page questionnaire checking boxes on aligned theology. She has good advice on having a thick skin if you are going to explore your faith in an online community. Lol. Christianity with a non Fundamentalist view is very different to all of us raised in Fundamentalist teachings. We expect an exact answer to everything when that is not realistic and is not life. She talks about her circle of influence and keeping them valuable and positive. She talks about her church - Reformed Christian not Evangelical Christian - that can help differentiate and navigate common modern organizations. She has her niche and her circle of friends. That is good. I get really lost trying to place her inner faith message with all of the modern and woke labels and descriptions. Accepting variances of views in other Christians while still working with them praying with them interacting and doing ministry work with them to me is the crux of all the teachings on one body of Christ which TWI has missed for decades generations and most of their lifetimes.

Ok this is stirring up remembering some language studies. The point I remember was the imperative voice in verbs. It is in koine Greek where Jesus does the Lord’s Prayer throughout all those verbs. I don’t think the equivalent exists in Hebrew or Aramaic. I don’t know if that equates to a passive voice in “let there be light”. Maybe so. Would Zeus say “Light” as a command? I don’t have a burning need to make all the jigsaw puzzles fit. I view the OT as primitive times technology wise and ethics wise. So I accept the dichotomy of vision.

This is why I love the wizard of Oz. It shows the little person behind the large act.

Sure. Here’s a Voice of Elijah website discussing it. https://www.voiceofelijah.org/questions-and-answers/what-is-a-hebrew-idiom.html#:~:text=A Hebrew idiom is the,words that comprise the idiom. That describes more of the general pattern of Hebrew idioms. Some of these seem to have apostolic roots which is Pentecostal. Pretty different from TWI and Bullinger. I would present the idea that it is a common way to explain violent acts of God in the OT. And that it represents nothing more than not giving criminals press time. While telling a story of a sovereign God. Perhaps the catch phrase “idiom of permission” itself was a Bullinger classification. But not the idea. I get some value from Bullingers figures of speech. And from Darbys lists. And from Josephus cultural accounts. I am sure Bullinger would have excommunicated VPW from whatever denomination he was part of for using his works in a way he didn’t intend. If they lived in the same time.

Yeah well it’s not that hard to find other references https://www.amazon.com/Hebrew-Idiom-Permission-Troy-Edwards/dp/B0BBQLC9TF?nodl=1&dplnkId=a9c3738c-2fbc-407c-aeab-f9e04bb70028

No English lit degrees nor am a grammar teacher. Yes shocking I know lol. Here are some notes on the Hebrew idiom of permission from the Revised English Version https://www.revisedenglishversion.com/Rom/9/18#:~:text=To be clear then%2C we,that God caused the hardening. No connection to TWI there …. Yeah edit. My phone died I just saw this was a Schoenheit translation.

C I looked that up and he is from a “One God Apostolic” denominational background. Which is Pentecostal. Which is all of the Branham stuff in another thread here. Here is the organization thread for Kevin’s One God Apostolic site. It is mentioned at the bottom of his website. https://www.truthministriesapostolicchurch.org

Sooooo. Would there be a religion called “Twiggianity”? A cult offshoot of the “Churchianity” religion?

Imagine modern day despots…… Who are actually atheists. Ok that’s my attempt at writing another verse…

I relate to this. I like the texture of books. I have used this option as kind of like the book feel instead of more time on the same phone or tablet. Don’t know if it will help if not ignore lol. Kindle Paperwhite https://a.co/d/iiRVjFr

I am a little less on the side of God says what He means and means what He says option as I feel that is too extreme of an interpretation of inspired writing that leads to denominations and cults. My viewpoint is denouncing fundamentalism but not the overall Christianity message and concepts. This leads me to view scripture more as a muse behind the writings as opposed to automatic writing dictation. The latter to me produces a “Stepford wives” result that seems independent from whatever message is being peddled. It seems very susceptible also to the Machiavellian pettiness present in all the worlds systems as opposed to a grassroots message to free the individual. I feel that the muse view preserves the individual as well as the grassroots message. Of course my views are = .06 with inflation lol.

Matt 24 presents a contradiction in timelines for sure. This is one that has foiled the JWs through multiple generations of failed prophecy regarding the so called end times. I have heard explanations that sound like rationalizations from multiple sources. I don’t have a better explanation but am more inclined to go with the face value of Jesus was wrong or didn’t know and was guessing. Can a man without sin be wrong? I had previously thought the answer was “only if that man is married” lol. But is Jesus proving me wrong once again?

And yet this sounds remarkably like a position in an argument. Methinks the lady doth protest too much. The “intent of the original writers” huh? So in dropping the idea of an imaginary God you have replaced it with God like mind reading capabilities that you possess? Hmmmm. Or could it just be older writers are writing about rougher times? And could it also be that 100 percent of us here bought into VPWs snake oil and could be labeled “idiots of permission”???

This is a bit but ever since I watched the movie “Men Who Stare at Goats” I have had to construct a Boston road-trip playlist that really captures this.

Twinky you can get both of Charlene’s books on Kindle. Do a search for author.

To me the idiom of permission is similar to some of the practices I see changing in reporting the news. They used to highly publicize all three names of any offender including doing foia requests for booking shots. More recently they have refrained from publishing the serial killers names prominently in shooting incidents so as not to give them the attention or press they seek. My understanding of the IOP is basically God is inspiring the same kind of thing so that the entire subject of the OT is not Satan, his angels, and his influenced subjects. Bringing up Occam reminds me of an old story. A guy walks into a bathroom stall and reads “God is dead”. Nietsche. Underneath the guy crossed it out and wrote “Nietsche is dead”. God. Is it ironic that the closest thing now to Occam is dirt and daisies?

I wonder if all of the followers of the Way approve of using their tithes to send postcard spam to every physical mail location of a grad in their “book of life” database. What's next? I know they can transform into a “Watchtower Society” type of publication group making comic books for witnessing with middle school level topics. Then each Way Ambassador could pass them out during mandated door to door witnessing outings. And they could report weekly on how many new people they have for Plaffy. Oh wait they already do that.

I can relate to this logic. If we solve our own problems with Christ’s help then there is no place for the narcissist in the equation. People can choose freely their own future without needing to be entangled with the bondage others seek to profit from a Christ -> believer relationship. And I can freely give to the most deserving without obligation.

It is very PT Barnum like. The greatest show on earth. There's a sucker born every minute.

Yes I see.

No that would be everyone on the forum. DDOS attacks don’t single people out.

Sometimes I wonder if someone somewhere is doing an experiment with a chatbot. It doesn't offend me. It does resemble a bit of a DDOS attack though. Flood the forum with random threads and contributions that to me and many do seem anti-Christian in overall character. I mean they do seem overall friendly and not hostile. If all these philosophical ponderings are here then the question I have is “ if you are ADHD enough is a squirrel connected to everything?”

Hold on. Just for one second stop constructing more random references. Consider that perhaps just possibly the things that offend him could be about you? I mean even Taylor can own up to her impact in “Anti Hero”. Maybe you should listen to that on repeat rather than upping your post count by another 500 random agitated posts?

Yes it is interesting here as well as on the cult related Reddit channels I read that there are quite a lot of people whose fruit evidenced after being in a cult is to reject Christianity completely. There are others like me who reject Fundamentalist approaches and retain faith. I float around churches and mainstream Christians. I guess the remaining would be in splinters with whitewashed statues of VP in their closets as they try to drum up participants for their latest version of Plaffy the new light which is old light. That is going to be part of Christs return setting all these imbalances in order IMO. One Lord one faith one baptism not all these clowns spouting hot air.