Raf

I say Ex-TWI and Mrs. Ex-TWI. We could get Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston to play them.

Can anyone objectively prove that the bookstore was ever closed to the public? Was this ever in writing anywhere? I'm just thinking that if they ARE doing this for legal reasons, Pat and TWIM need to establish that the bookstore was indeed closed to the public in order to score that point. Otherwise they can say it was always open to the public, but Greasespotters were just engaging in spreading more lies about TWI and never bothered to check.

If that's truly your decision, then fine. But def, if you're happy giving at the level you're giving at now, that's fine too. Your giving should be a reflection of the life you live for God, and that's for you to determine, not for others to judge. Do you consider yourself a strong believer? Does your giving reflect this? Do you consider yourself someone who speaks and preaches the gospel? Does your giving reflect this? Do you consider yourself knowledgeable in the Scriptures? Does your giving reflect this? Do you consider yourself diligent when it comes to the things of God? Does your giving reflect this? Do you love God and love your neighbor as yourself? Does your giving reflect this? These are among the standards which motivate us toward generosity in our giving. Hey def! We agree on something! :)-->

ANN B. DAVIS!!! HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!

There was a thread on this not that long ago. I kept saying Terry Bradshaw should play LCM. And someone else suggested Anthony Hopkins as VPW.

Look at it this way: Trinitarians are afforded the privilege of referring to their belief as "Orthodox," which means "true doctrine." Biblical Unitarians don't enjoy the same privilege. Trinitarians are also fond of saying that "Biblical Unitarianism" is an oxymoron. Anyway, like I said, I see your point.

The movie does not detail the origin of the Marauder's Map, nor does it reveal the identities of Messrs. Mooney, Wormtail, Padfoot and Prongs. And that's a shame, because it really cements the storyline.

Tithing is good. So is giving nine percent. Or five. Or two. Or 11, or 15, or 25. It depends on what you can give and how much you want to give. The moment it becomes a matter of obligation, it loses its worth. The moment it becomes a matter of pride (look at how much I give), it loses its worth. The NT encourages generous giving, and so do I. The NT does not require a tithe, and neither do I. Tithe if you want to, but tithe because you want to. The percentage doesn't impress God. The heart does.

Pat, You're hardly an objective test case: you're currently involved in a lawsuit with them. You've got red flags all over the place. Oldiesman and Tom (assuming Tom Strange to be a pseudonym) are not known here by name. I doubt that I qualify as anonymous, for that matter. Maybe Word Wolf, or Goey, or some of the others who use pseudonyms should try it.

Hi Bogey. Welcome to the Cafe. How do you take your coffee?

Def, While I understand what you're saying, the difference is that there is a religious belief called "Unitarianism" that is not Biblical. "Biblical Unitarianism" is a distinction that avoids confusion with the generic term "Unitarianism." "Biblical Trinitarianism" is redundant, since the Trinitarian argument is recognized as being based on people's understanding of the Bible. "Unitarianism," without the "Biblical" prefix, is not recognized as being based on people's understanding of the Bible. "Biblical Unitarianism" more specifically distinguishes between that belief and "Unitarian Universalism."

Why change tactics? We should keep doing what we're doing: sharing our histories while conducting honest/vigorous debates about doctrine and practice. If we can do anything, we can praise them for doing the right thing and opening their bookstore to the public, just like any other church would do. Secrecy only breeds speculation, rumor and innuendo. If TWI's books are not for sale, and if TWI will only share its books with members, then the only people who will be able to say anything about TWI's books publicly are those who are critical of them. So Bravo to TWI for opening the bookstore.

Oldiesman, I can't speak for what you're feeling inside, but I can speak for your words. You're calling her a liar. Period. Your words indicate more than "I just don't believe everything she says." You are flat-out accusing her of lying. To not see that is to not realize the power of your words. "I was told ABC." "I don't believe you." You're accusing her of lying. You have every right to do that. It's your prerogative. It's also disgusting. I think that's a much better way to make your statement, mj. Thank you for clarifying.

You know, it's one thing to argue and have an intelligent/heated discussion about the extent to which TWI pressured people to have abortions and/or the amount of choice the people had or felt they had. It's another thing entirely to tell someone that she was not told what she was told. I find that statement appalling. Argue with Rascal all you want. You are entitled to your own opinion. But as the saying goes, you are not entitled to your own facts. It is a fact that this is what she was told. I think Rascal is owed an apology (for whatever my thoughts are worth).

Saw it last night, with someone who hadn't read the book. There was a little trouble following the big plot twist at the climax, but my friend caught on right before it got scary. Tom, you're already pretty much caught up. But since you're on track, might as well watch the second movie before you see the third. Kenneth Branagh's performance alone is worth the price of the DVD. It'll also get you accustomed to the boys' voice changes and introduce you to Ron's parents, Draco's dad (who shows up again in the fourth movie, no doubt) and gives a bit more background on Hagrid. The new Dumbledore is terrific. Richard Harris brought a lot of dignity to the role, but the new guy brought just the right touch of mischief. In the first two movies you get a sense that Dumbledore is aware of the mischief that the trio are up to, but in this one, he's a bit more actively complicit. Harris was aging to the point where I wonder if he could have pulled it off. The third movie is incredible, I thought. Great acting all around, and it's the first time you get a real sense that this is part of a series: it's the first one that leaves you eager for the next installment. Our audience applauded when the director's credit came up.

Single. And can you do me a favor? Make it real small. And print it 1,000 times. You can hand it to me in a scroll. No need to waste money on wood; just wrap it around a cylindrical piece of cardboard.

I don't miss the cost. I don't miss the pressure to tithe. I don't miss the need to explain why the ministry did not do any charitable works with the money it was getting from its abs. I don't miss the need to explain that "moving the Word" is more important than feeding the hungry and clothing the poor. I don't miss the angry tone of L. Craig Martindale.

I like you anyway, John. :)-->

You flatterer you. I take it you received my check.

Diazbro, With all due respect, we won't know what the courts are thinking about any of this until there has at least been a hearing. Anyone can file a lawsuit claiming anything, and any defendant can file a counterclaim. To say the courts are taking this seriously requires a bit of prognosticating. You don't have the slightest idea whether the courts will take Pat seriously, or whether they will take TWI's claim seriously for that matter.

Aww, I wanna see what you originally wrote! But I'll be okay. Job's fine. Just a tad off topic. :)-->

Ok, that's much better: The veracity of the Trinity OR the veracity of Biblical Unitarianism rises or falls on the doctrine, not on the integrity of those who espouse it. That's what Goey was saying, and it appears that you are saying the same thing.

Def, That's not what he said. You're grossly misrepresenting what Goey wrote. By your standard, anything taught by Jim Bakker and Jimmy Swaggart should be dismissed, including the Trinity, life after death, etc.

I took someone to see the second movie, when she had not seen the first. It only took a few sentences for her to catch up. Here it is: A Harry Potter Primer For Those Who've Missed the First Two Movies. When Harry was an infant, his parents were killed by an evil wizard named Voldemort. He was so evil people are afraid to say his name to this day. Voldemort tried to kill the infant Harry, but failed. The encounter left Voldemort "dead," and Harry with a lightning bolt shaped scar. Needless to say, Harry became quite famous in the wizarding world. But he was unaware of this because, while still an infant, he was placed in the care of his non-wizard aunt and uncle. When Harry was 11, he learned that he was a wizard and that he was about to start a seven year education program at the Hogwarts school of witchcraft and wizardry. His aunt and uncle never told him this because they hate the whole idea of it. They are, shall we say, not encouraging. They have a porky son who's Harry's age. They dote over their son and are not very fond of Harry. Once Harry starts school, he makes two friends: Ron and Hermione. He also makes an enemy, Draco. And he thinks he has an enemy in Professor Snape, a dark-robed, sinister looking teacher who always seems to have it in for Harry. Harry's really good at flying a broom, so he's on one of the school's four Quidditch teams. Think mid-air hockey, although it's a touch more complicated than that. For reasons that would spoil the fun, I can't tell you why but every year (so far), a different teacher has been in charge of the class "Defense Against the Dark Arts." Year three is no different. Did I leave anything crucial out? Oh yes, Voldemort. Turns out he (paging Lord Sauron) is not quite dead. He's made two attempts so far to reincarnate. And some people (Draco's dad included) would love to see that happen.

You can say that again. If they reopen their bookstore, I would consider that a good thing. It's just honest. I wouldn't shop there, though. As someone already said, they don't sell anything I want/need that's not available at another Christian bookstore.