Excerpt: "Parents should want their children to be Advanced Class graduates. Training our children so they can stand will help them maximize their rewards at the bema."
Is it not good enough to let a child grow up and choose for themselves or is the product so shabby that they got to use brainwashing to get their own way kids to take it?
Excerpt: "Parents should want their children to be Advanced Class graduates. Training our children so they can stand will help them maximize their rewards at the bema."
And of course the only way to help your children "stand" is to put them through the Advanced Class, which means putting them through all the prerequisite classes....
It was the TOTAL opposite from CFS! I've taken all of them, and this was so "pure and innocent". They did hit on adultery as wrong and had some enlightening points about why it was "winked" at in the old testament to have more that one wife.... from the beginning God's original plan was 1 husband and 1 wife. But being used to the "racey" classes, this one was so stiff, we laughed. It looked like the nuns from Sunday school teaching it. Not relaxed and casual , more like memorizing the notes reading the prompter, smile/laugh when it says.....weird. So when something silly is to be said, it just didn't feel right. For example: He is addressing young people and how to not touch a woman (sexually) until marriage and to learn to keep your thoughts under control, but if your passions get too much, then "Solitary masturbation is fine."...(with a straight face). It seemed very uncomfortable and odd... But from what I read it was better for kids than some of Vepee's old classes!!!
Just have them take all the classes, show a tacit dissaproval of adultery, don't "mess" with animals, and you're all set for the rewards of all eternity..
Just have them take all the classes, show a tacit dissaproval of adultery, don't "mess" with animals, and you're all set for the rewards of all eternity..
Of course the name is a misnomer.
It's based on the original's name, and, for the life of me,
I don't remember much about "Christian Family"
in the "Christian Family and S*x" class.
There was stuff on slang nicknames and a description of
some weird stuff we've already discussed,
there was something on the last chapter of Proverbs,
which, to be honest, was one of the few things that BELONGED
there.
======
The overly-sanitized version at least makes a few direct
claims that contradict the practices of yesterday...
then again, so did the class of yesterday, and the man who
claimed that it was wrong for a man to "help himself" to a
woman had no difficulty helping himself to women back then.
But hey, what's a little cognitive dissonance when you're
Recommended Posts
learning
I think there was a post about this earlier on... I def. remember comments about no beastiality!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jim
I can definitively say that no, I am not taking it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shellon
crud this can't be a good thing for my family.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bliss
Excerpt: "Parents should want their children to be Advanced Class graduates. Training our children so they can stand will help them maximize their rewards at the bema."
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Belle
Hey Bliss, I have the syllabus, but missed the exciting class. We could take turns posting juicy tidbits like that profound quote if'n ya want.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nottawayfer
Is that the class that they had the J*e and L*nda Coult*r teach?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
herbiejuan
I find that quote very disturbing
Is it not good enough to let a child grow up and choose for themselves or is the product so shabby that they got to use brainwashing to get their own way kids to take it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dmiller
I hope that isn't a *re-make* of the christian family and sex class !
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dmiller
What kinda junk does this class teach??
Womb to tomb (and beyond) salvation, courtesy of twi???
Am betting all their *research material* came from the "way rag", er "mag"
(ex--cuzzzze me).
David
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shazdancer
Of course.
-->
Shaz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bliss
Yes, the C***t*r's teach this class.
It was the TOTAL opposite from CFS! I've taken all of them, and this was so "pure and innocent". They did hit on adultery as wrong and had some enlightening points about why it was "winked" at in the old testament to have more that one wife.... from the beginning God's original plan was 1 husband and 1 wife. But being used to the "racey" classes, this one was so stiff, we laughed. It looked like the nuns from Sunday school teaching it. Not relaxed and casual , more like memorizing the notes reading the prompter, smile/laugh when it says.....weird. So when something silly is to be said, it just didn't feel right. For example: He is addressing young people and how to not touch a woman (sexually) until marriage and to learn to keep your thoughts under control, but if your passions get too much, then "Solitary masturbation is fine."...(with a straight face). It seemed very uncomfortable and odd... But from what I read it was better for kids than some of Vepee's old classes!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bliss
That abbreviation CFS= Christian Fam and S*x class!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Belle
Stepford!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tom Strange
Shel! Run! A boa constrictor is eating your head!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
Interesting. How to raise your family.
Just have them take all the classes, show a tacit dissaproval of adultery, don't "mess" with animals, and you're all set for the rewards of all eternity..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
learning
And no sex b4 marriage
That was a change from the past for some (hello Craig)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WordWolf
Of course the name is a misnomer.
It's based on the original's name, and, for the life of me,
I don't remember much about "Christian Family"
in the "Christian Family and S*x" class.
There was stuff on slang nicknames and a description of
some weird stuff we've already discussed,
there was something on the last chapter of Proverbs,
which, to be honest, was one of the few things that BELONGED
there.
======
The overly-sanitized version at least makes a few direct
claims that contradict the practices of yesterday...
then again, so did the class of yesterday, and the man who
claimed that it was wrong for a man to "help himself" to a
woman had no difficulty helping himself to women back then.
But hey, what's a little cognitive dissonance when you're
operating at that level of hypocrisy anyway?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shellon
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.