Rocky

It certainly was apparent even though it took quite a while to figure out which one.

How generous of you, my Lord.

I totally understand. A couple years ago i started/tried reading a book by Peter Gabel, a law professor who has been a university president. (Desire for Mutual Recognition). What I could get through (and understand) made sense. But his sentences were almost exclusively very long with numerous dependent clauses. I got frustrated and gave up. I wrote a review on amazon giving it only three stars. The handful of other reviews and rates were primarily five star. Professor Gavel contacted me by email (which was posted on my blog site). We had a nice 20-30 minute chat on zoom. Now I reflect back to a cost accounting class I took in the mid-1980s. The instructor apparently very much disliked my (then) writing style. I had been using long sentences. Never got higher than a C grade on any writing assignment in that class. Jump forward a decade and while working for an Arizona state government agency, I took a professional development class the agency offered on Effective Writing. That class changed my life dramatically. I've been writing a LOT ever since. I had numerous op-eds and letters to editors published afterward. Now I write a blog (political) and have posted more than 1,100 of my own essays to it. For the last couple of years, I've been thinking in terms of writing fiction. I still haven't written much of it. But hopefully, when I get started, it will flow like rivers. All of that to make the point that if nobody reads any of it, I don't see the point. So, I try not to write those humongous sentences anymore.

The same verses from the Message Bible: 1-2 The Word was first, the Word present to God, God present to the Word. The Word was God, in readiness for God from day one. 3-5 Everything was created through him; nothing—not one thing!— came into being without him. What came into existence was Life, and the Life was Light to live by. The Life-Light blazed out of the darkness; the darkness couldn’t put it out. From my perspective (as it is now, not what it was 30+ years ago), I'm thrilled by penguin2's ideas. I'm not right and you're not wrong. (Which contrasts how I viewed things 35 years ago). In much the same way reading classic literature can help a person learn how to think deeply, it seems obvious that comparing these two versions/translations CAN foster deep thinking. This is important because I believe there is so much to God that we puny humans can even come close to comprehending. Thanks so much to every commenter here for your thoughts and suggestions. WE belong to each other not because we fellowship in the same living room or annual cult festival, but because we share a journey and a heritage and can fellowship with each other in THIS cyber living room. I love you.

Intriguing. John 1:1-5 from the Passion Translation 1 In the very beginning[a] the Living Expression[b] was already there. And the Living Expression was with God, yet fully God.[c] 2 They were together—face-to-face,[d] in the very beginning.[e] 3 And through his creative inspiration this Living Expression made all things,[f] for nothing has existence apart from him! 4 Life came into being[g] because of him, for his life is light for all humanity.[h] 5 And this Living Expression is the Light that bursts through gloom[i]— the Light that darkness could not diminish![j]

Obviously, I'm not the one who's disappointed. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear. Matthew 11:15

I would think it's important to use a beer that you like. There are some that can taste pretty bad. I remember a bad one my mother's second husband used to buy that I've heard referred to as weasel p i s s. (Carling's Black Label).

Socks, what do you use to season it on top? Those look great.

I believe dmiller IS on Facebook. Friends there with several current and/or former GSCers... but not me, so I wouldn't be the guy to ask him for more specifics.

Thanks. I knew what sourdough starter is. And I figured that might be what you meant by the bubble substance. But couldn't find anything doing an internet search.

Bubble substance? Haven't seen that expression before that I can recall, but I used to enjoy a chewy sourdough bread. But now I stay away from white flour products as much as possible.

Don't forget Johnny Jump Up.

RE-read all of the comments to this topic. Your demand has already been met.

We KNOW you by your words. Btw, repetition of anything is the "mother" of memorization, not of understanding and certainly not of wisdom. In case you haven't gotten the message yet, nobody here seems to agree with your premise about the significance of the 7th Day Sabbath. Discussion of the underlying issues here has been done ad nauseum. Another way to look at it is like how Nathan cut to the heart of the issue with King David in II Samuel 12. Here, you're just not considering the possibility that you might learn something if you opened your heart to the wisdom several people here have so compassionately tried to reach you with.

I've wondered (for a long time) if one can make whole grain sourdough bread. What do you think about that?

to live together, one light, one way! Wise words to Waxit... who perhaps would do well to clean the wax out of his ears.

That seems like a poignant and concise description of the brainwashing effect that Wierwille's subculture system established.

Dude, so many kind words here, trying to effectively communicate important concepts about life, don't seem to have gotten through to you. Even Twinky's admonitions to you, as kind as they REALLY are. The kindest thing I can say to/about you is that you respond to people here as if you are completely tone deaf. IF you "get it," you're thus far not making that known by your words here.

I'd agree with you (actually, I do agree with you for the most part) except that I am able to block ads online for the most part. I abhor them. Because of the essay I quoted, I'm going to embark on a whaling ship soon (well, in the novel Moby Dick, which I didn't read in HS). I missed out on a lot of literature in HS. That's my biggest regret for those years of schooling. I did obtain Melville's book for free to read on my Kindle app. I also didn't learn Latin in HS or college. I did take four years of French. However, having graduated... 48 years ago, and never having traveled to France or any other French-speaking land, the best I can do with it now is to watch movies wherein the dialogue is in French and try to recognize words and match them with the English subtitles. I won't rule out someday travelling to Paris. And perhaps Italy. During my military service, I did make it to Germany twice. For that experience, I'm thankful. I do spend more time reading, either books or current affairs/news. It was in Air Force technical training that I learned to type. As a telecommunications system tech, I spent more than three years communicating by dedicated teletype (we called them "order wire"). It became imprinted in my brain. Probably that's why I am comfortable posting online in social media and GSC, and writing a blog. Thanks, WW for your insight.

Well, I've been thinking about that... and how easily people get conned (in general) these days. So I found an intriguing essay about classic literature that contrasts with VP quite well. https://medium.com/@spencerbaum/3-reasons-why-you-should-read-more-classic-literature-in-2019-e762cb5c910c Call me Ishmael. The famous opening sentence of Moby Dick, so short and provocative, is welcoming and familiar to the 21st century reader, who is accustomed to snappy prose with short sentences and lots of white space. A few sentences later in Melville’s masterpiece we get a sentence that’s more representative of the novel to come. In just a bit I’m going to quote that sentence, and insist that you read it. And I mean really read it. Don’t skim it. This essay is about to make the argument that there is value to the way the classics force us to slow down and concentrate, and it will be easier for you to understand that point if you experience it first. Here’s the quote from Moby Dick. Please read it slowly and carefully: "Whenever I find myself growing grim about the mouth; whenever it is a damp, drizzly November in my soul; whenever I find myself involuntarily pausing before coffin warehouses, and bringing up the rear of every funeral I meet; and especially whenever my hypos get such an upper hand of me, that it requires a strong moral principle to prevent me from deliberately stepping into the street, and methodically knocking people’s hats off — then, I account it high time to get to sea as soon as I can." This brings us to the first and, to my mind, most important reason to read the classics in 2019 2020. 1. You should read classic literature because it forces you to think deeply and concentrate. 21st century media is hell on the attention span. But you already know this. You know that our digital devices are shortening our attention spans, teaching us to only skim the surface of ideas, and making us addicts to tiny dopamine bursts that come from (among other things) the Like and Share buttons. As we near the end of the second decade of the 21st century we’ve developed widespread awareness that our devices have made us shallow thinkers. We’re less cognizant, however, of the effect of the content itself. Or the style in which the content is written. Have you ever wondered why so many of the articles you read, like this one, are organized in numbered lists? Or why the writing in these articles is so often organized into ultra-short paragraphs, many of them only one sentence long? We, the content creators of the 21st century, have learned to write in snappy lists with short sentences and one-sentence paragraphs. We write this way because this is what you, the content consumers of the 21st century, choose to read. You like content that is clear, concise, simple, and to the point. You’re in a hurry (always), and we writers know, God do we know, that we are competing not just against other essays or other books, but against the endless siren songs of Facebook, Instagram, Youtube, and Twitter. We know that if we ask too much of you, say, if we give you a long sentence or, God forbid, a long paragraph, we might be taxing your mind more than you’re interested in having it taxed. We know that a complicated, multi-layered thought, one that might require you to slow down or reread a sentence or look up from your screen and think for a minute is too much to ask when your phone is bursting with notifications and there’s a new video on your favorite Youtube channel and everyone’s talking about that new show on Netflix but you haven’t even seen the last new show everyone was talking about yet and you’ve got ten tabs open on your browser and 3,000 unread books on your Kindle and holy hell who has time to consume it all just open my vein and fill it with listicles please! There’s a cost to all this. In the book The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains (a 2011 Pulitzer Prize finalist for general nonfiction), Nicolas Carr looks at all the research in neuroscience and psychology about what the Internet is doing to our brains and determines that, yes, our ceaseless attempts to skim this glut of information is making us shallow thinkers who are far less capable of deep, focused, intense thought than our parents and grandparents were. You should read the classics in 2019 to unlearn the shallowness and impatience you are learning in your hyper-accelerated 21st century life. When you read Melville (or Hugo or Austen or Tolstoy or Plato or Shakespeare) you are sharing headspace with someone who is much better at slow, deep, meaningful thinking than you are because they’ve never lived in the shallows like you do. ***** The essay continues, but I hope you get the point. Wierwille obviously didn't want you to THINK.

Actually, it was Human without the bean who said it. In addition to Shaz' reply, (and I've been able to reflect on this for more than three decades) yes, we grew up. When we were children, we had no knowledge or experience to draw on to evaluate what we saw, heard and experienced in TWI. And for some (i.e. those who decided to never look to anything outside of the cult for insight) they may have never figured it out. Further, when we were children, we may have been religiously indoctrinated or emotionally prepared such that we were more prone to the particular line of b u l l s h i t Wierwille was peddling. EVERYone gets conned in life, in some ways or others. We got conned by Wierwille. What's important is that we eventually saw through the con.

FWIW, IMO, believing that the 10 commandments were given by God to the Israelites one at least kinda has to side-step cultural history and anthropology too.

Good luck getting a straight answer from him on that.

I get your point, and I don't disagree. But I'm not entirely comfortable with harshly confronting anyone's personal story/experience either.

It may just be a technicality, but doctrines are written down. Practices, which I believe more fairly characterizes the situation with "loosening up" aren't necessarily documented as official beliefs. It probably would have been eradicated at some point well before the actual litigation if it had been a doctrine. That said, I don't discount your experience in any way, brother.