As these events unfold, the world will increasingly become aware of the authenticity of the words in this book and realize that Ronald Weinland has been sent by God as His end-time prophet.
If he was sent by God I would think he is showing up a little bit late since it is already 2008. Kind of like closing the barn door after the cows are out.
..."become aware of the authenticity of the words of this book..." That shows me right there what he is promoting. He is concerned with validating the authenticity of whose book? His website is all about him and his greatness.
You don't need an end time prophet to know that what we were taught about the rapture and the tribulation was wrong. There are a number of writings about it.
With the exception of Nostradamus, the present discussion is focusing on December 21, 2012(Mayan prophecy). Nostradamus thought it was 1 Million AD(Common Era).
Why does time have to have an end? How many groups and prophets have predicted the "end times" and been wrong? More than a few. I don't think Jesus is coming back.
Either way coming or not doesn't it say in the word that no man shall know when that day is to be and if any ones says they do they are a liar. (or am I just spouting Weirwille words???)
And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up , and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled : and after that he must be loosed a little season.
I love the way God never forces himself on us. . . . all through the gospels Jesus tells us to consider this. . . consider that. . . many Christians live their lives like they will never stand before him. . . . so, those who don't think He is coming back are really not alone.
I have that hope in my heart. I. . . like Bride. . . . believe he is coming back.
I assume you're referring to when he said, "The Kingdom of God is within you," which is often quoted but usually misunderstood. A better translation (which is in many other English versions) is "the Kingdom of God is AMONG you." He was talking to the Pharisees, so if he meant "within you" he wouldn't have said it to them. Signs of the Kingdom were there for all to see, but he wasn't redefining the Kingdom as a spiritual kingdom in the heart, as many interpret that passage. He goes on in that context (Luke 17) to speak of the Son coming visibly in judgment. He is here now through the holy spirit in believers, but he is not physically present on earth. He is going to be though, when he returns from heaven.
My thinking is that when and if Jesus does return to earth, between the combination of Jesus setting such a good and honest example of a righteous lifestyle while on earth. And the low and desperate state that the world may be in, in the future when he does return. That Jesus will be greatly admired and esteemed in his return by just about everyone alive regardless of whether they believed in Jesus being the son of God and Lord or not before his return.
Jesus will return a conquering hero and be loved and esteemed by mankind. Quite a contrast to his death.
if you think your brand of believing is all that will
then that is a pharisee
By that logic, then everyone who is committed to their belief is a Pharisee. Practically every religion says their way is the right way and others are wrong. This attitude was not unique to the Pharisees.
As for what I believe, I don't consider it "my brand of believing" - I just believe what Jesus said.
By that logic, then everyone who is committed to their belief is a Pharisee. Practically every religion says their way is the right way and others are wrong. This attitude was not unique to the Pharisees.
As for what I believe, I don't consider it "my brand of believing" - I just believe what Jesus said.
Wrong, sorry, not everyone believes that only their religion will be saved. Even the most committed ones in them. In fact there are many religions that teach all will be saved.
Being committed to a belief does not equal excluding other beliefs. On the contrary, many religions are committed to including all religions and people with no religion at all.
Practically every religion says their way is the right way and others are wrong.
Those that do are not well informed. Or just refuse good sense.
Wrong, sorry, not everyone believes that only their religion will be saved. Even the most committed ones in them. In fact there are many religions that teach all will be saved.
Being committed to a belief does not equal excluding other beliefs. On the contrary, many religions are committed to including all religions and people with no religion at all.
Those that do are not well informed. Or just refuse good sense.
OK, so MOST religions believe they are right and others wrong. Or you could even narrow it down to MANY. My point was that it was not limited to the Pharisees, so having that attitude does not make you a Pharisee.
Besides, the only reason I even mentioned the Pharisees in the first place was to point out that if Jesus had meant to say that the Kingdom of God is "within you" he would not be saying it to the Pharisees whom he called "of your father the devil." The better translation is "the Kingdom of God is among you" and he went on to describe how the Kingdom would eventually come to earth visibly.
Recommended Posts
waysider
As these events unfold, the world will increasingly become aware of the authenticity of the words in this book and realize that Ronald Weinland has been sent by God as His end-time prophet.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just what we need, another "authority" who's been "sent by God" as a "prophet".
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kimberly
Rejoice, honey, I am with Waysider.
If he was sent by God I would think he is showing up a little bit late since it is already 2008. Kind of like closing the barn door after the cows are out.
..."become aware of the authenticity of the words of this book..." That shows me right there what he is promoting. He is concerned with validating the authenticity of whose book? His website is all about him and his greatness.
Don't buy into his fear tactics, sweetheart.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark Clarke
You don't need an end time prophet to know that what we were taught about the rapture and the tribulation was wrong. There are a number of writings about it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DrWearWord
It does not have to be the "end time" to have a prophet. :)
Many prophets may arise before the end times begin.
This generation has seen many prophets.
There may be great times of peace before the days of wrath come.
The dead in Christ have been raised on Wikipedia... and we who are alive and remain have met the lord in the air over the internet through satellites.
We may all be getting a text message from God soon in the twinkling of an eye and see Jesus face to face on webcam...
:)
Edited by DrWearWordLink to comment
Share on other sites
waterbuffalo
...well, I just hope someone teaches me how to read those stupid things before he comes back....
...well, I just hope someone teaches me how to read those stupid things before he comes back....
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thomas Loy Bumgarner
With the exception of Nostradamus, the present discussion is focusing on December 21, 2012(Mayan prophecy). Nostradamus thought it was 1 Million AD(Common Era).
Link to comment
Share on other sites
brideofjc
Praise our Lord Jesus Christ...whether we see Him with our own eyes or we are raised from the dead...
HE IS COMING BACK!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Oakspear
Why does time have to have an end? How many groups and prophets have predicted the "end times" and been wrong? More than a few. I don't think Jesus is coming back.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
leafytwiglet
Either way coming or not doesn't it say in the word that no man shall know when that day is to be and if any ones says they do they are a liar. (or am I just spouting Weirwille words???)
you see how much I study the word now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
REM said it, I believe it, that settles it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
leafytwiglet
:)
Sooooo Mayan Chocolate anyone while we await the end of life as we know it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
time will end, one person at a time
yeah oaks, i don't think he's coming back either
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DrWearWord
Revelation 20:3 KJV
And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up , and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled : and after that he must be loosed a little season.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Oakspear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
Or anyone else for that matter.
Where would they go anyway!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
geisha779
I love the way God never forces himself on us. . . . all through the gospels Jesus tells us to consider this. . . consider that. . . many Christians live their lives like they will never stand before him. . . . so, those who don't think He is coming back are really not alone.
I have that hope in my heart. I. . . like Bride. . . . believe he is coming back.
No big shocker there I guess.
Edited by geisha779Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
Where is he coming from?
Is he not here now?
Here is Christ
There is Christ
Is what he taught about it being within true?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark Clarke
I assume you're referring to when he said, "The Kingdom of God is within you," which is often quoted but usually misunderstood. A better translation (which is in many other English versions) is "the Kingdom of God is AMONG you." He was talking to the Pharisees, so if he meant "within you" he wouldn't have said it to them. Signs of the Kingdom were there for all to see, but he wasn't redefining the Kingdom as a spiritual kingdom in the heart, as many interpret that passage. He goes on in that context (Luke 17) to speak of the Son coming visibly in judgment. He is here now through the holy spirit in believers, but he is not physically present on earth. He is going to be though, when he returns from heaven.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark Sanguinetti
My thinking is that when and if Jesus does return to earth, between the combination of Jesus setting such a good and honest example of a righteous lifestyle while on earth. And the low and desperate state that the world may be in, in the future when he does return. That Jesus will be greatly admired and esteemed in his return by just about everyone alive regardless of whether they believed in Jesus being the son of God and Lord or not before his return.
Jesus will return a conquering hero and be loved and esteemed by mankind. Quite a contrast to his death.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
hm...
wasn't it the pharisees that claimed salvation
and not for others
the pharisees will be saved as well
if you think your brand of believing is all that will
then that is a pharisee
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark Clarke
By that logic, then everyone who is committed to their belief is a Pharisee. Practically every religion says their way is the right way and others are wrong. This attitude was not unique to the Pharisees.
As for what I believe, I don't consider it "my brand of believing" - I just believe what Jesus said.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cman
Wrong, sorry, not everyone believes that only their religion will be saved. Even the most committed ones in them. In fact there are many religions that teach all will be saved.
Being committed to a belief does not equal excluding other beliefs. On the contrary, many religions are committed to including all religions and people with no religion at all.
Those that do are not well informed. Or just refuse good sense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mark Clarke
OK, so MOST religions believe they are right and others wrong. Or you could even narrow it down to MANY. My point was that it was not limited to the Pharisees, so having that attitude does not make you a Pharisee.
Besides, the only reason I even mentioned the Pharisees in the first place was to point out that if Jesus had meant to say that the Kingdom of God is "within you" he would not be saying it to the Pharisees whom he called "of your father the devil." The better translation is "the Kingdom of God is among you" and he went on to describe how the Kingdom would eventually come to earth visibly.
Edited by Mark ClarkeLink to comment
Share on other sites
cman
it's in the pharisees as well
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.