The entire book is free for the reading, and printing out on your own. Follow the links to read it in it's entirety.
Mr. (or Mrs?) Miller,
Thanks for the link. I've wanted to write to Mr. Anderson for some time. He's a guy that has an interesting, introspective style in that book. It's an interesting "take" on Paul and James.
In Galatians 1:15 (NIV) he writes that God, "set me apart from birth and called me by his grace."
Huh?
I thought his conversion came about in Acts 9:1 when he was on the road to Damascus to persecute more of God's disciples "who belonged to the Way" (no pun intended, that's verbatim from verse 2 in the NIV).
If Paul was destined from birth to be an apostle of Jesus Christ then why did God allow him to stand by and approve the stoning of Stephen, one of God's disciples, "guarding the clothes of those who were killing him." (Acts 22:20)?
How did Paul arrive at the conclusion that he was chosen from birth? I can't find anywhere in scripture where the Lord ever told him that.
(One could argue that his conversion was a "new birth", but the trouble with that argument is that the term "from birth" here means "from my mother's womb".)
The Way was very big on teaching "predestination".
You will find a good deal about it in Ephesians, which is in (surprise, surprise)-----the epistles.
Okay, so I went back to Ephesians and in chapter 1 Paul says that God "blessed us in the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in Christ." (verse 3, NIV). He "chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love he predestined us to be adopted as his sons through Jesus Christ."(4-5). And then "11In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will..."
I'm confused about the use of the lower case male personal pronouns above. Is Paul saying that Jesus (not God) predestined all of them to be adopted as his disciples "before the creation of the world"? Did Jesus prophesy somewhere about Paul's birth?
The general concept of "predestination" is very troubling to me, and highly questionable. Does predestination mean that something is planned or that something will definitely happen? If we are creatures of free will, and if God does not control our thoughts and actions, then any of us, intentionally or not, are theoretically capable of messing His plans. Of what significance is it to say that something is predestined if any fool can "unpredestine" it?
I think that as far the New Testament goes, the birth of Jesus was obviously predestined -- and foretold. Who else? Well, Luke said that the birth of John the Baptist was foretold (Luke 1:13), but so far I don't remember anybody but Paul claiming that Paul's birth was foretold. Either Paul's birth was predestined and nobody "foretold" anybody, or Paul is making an unsubstantiated claim.
HERE is an interesting discussion we had a while back.
Thanks, waysider. That was a very interesting discussion. My mind started to go in all directions, but a few ideas are taking shape...call these my working hypotheses:
1. I don't think God has foreknowledge of all events. To say He does negates the concept of free will. Didn't God get angry at Israel on various occasions for disobeying His will? So I'm thinking...if I knew with 100% certainty that something was going to happen, why wouldn't I spare myself the hassle of getting angry about it when it actually does? God couldn't have known that Israel would disobey Him or He could have spared Himself the trouble of having to punish them.
2. Anyone can say that anything was pre-destined. And it's difficult to refute such claims, isn't it?
3. So far, I see no evidence in scripture that Paul was "predestined" to be called as an apostle of Jesus, apart from his own assertion.
This calls whole venues of divinity into question..
There are a few opinions I've read here and there...
Part of "God" had to die, giving birth to creation.. some think that the Almighty sacrificed (sound familiar?) part of Himself for the "greater Good".. that could be..
but God can't die. Where did his "parts" go?
He had everything.. at the beginning..
but it is rather "boring". I mean.. the 20 millionth year, with perfect weather..
I think the Almighty chose to reserve 50 percent of Divinity..
Well, I can think of once when God stepped into time. . . . but, . . . God is eternal and not limited to same concept of time we are constrained by. . . .
Where do the scriptures say we have freewill? I thought they said our nature was as the children of wrath and our choices dictated by whatever THAT heart felt. . . . is that true free will?
Bet freewill turns out to be somewhat paradoxical . .
I think we are saying the same thing in a slightly different dialect..
Would not surprise me in the least.. . .:)
I will say that I don't think God ever gets bored. Although it may sound funny to us. . . He takes great pleasure in His perfection. . . . over flowing joy in Himself. . . I believe so anyway.
My thought is we were created out of this joy and pleasure . . . to share in it. . . .and we are complete in it.
In secular terms we are all conditioned by our environment AND we decided for ourselves what to do about it. Bad choices lead to bad consequences and good choices to good, if life were always fair, which it is not.
Paul's words seem to include BOTH personal responsibility AND acknowledging that we are simply putty in God's hands.
Secular or scriptural I find both perspectives to be valuable considerations.
In a coversation of "nature vs. nurture" I find my answer to be of necessity, "BOTH" and after the first time I figured out that "both" works for me I thought to myself, "duh."
But most theological wrangling on how the specifics of these two perspectives work out in real life seems to me to lead to not much conversation that actually does much real good for anybody.
The self assessed "predestined" inheriters of righteousness often become elitist.
The ones who believe EVERYTHING in life is the result of personal choice can become pitiless bastards.
A consideration of both, for me at least, seems to lead to a balanced perspective.
Don't we? Everyday we make choices. And we have the freedom to sin or not sin as we please.
I believe that when you start breaking it down. . . . our freewill is limited to our nature. Sure, we can choose to sin, but can we really choose to be righteous? We can try to be righteous on our own, but, we even have a term for that in our vernacular . . . . it is called being self-righteous. :) Bit of a pejorative . . . right? For a good reason to. . . . we all sin, it is our nature. No one is truly righteous on their own.
Self-willed might be a more apt description than free-will. The power to choose the lesser of two evils isn't really free-will is it? And opting to choose neither is still a self-willed choice.
According scripture. . . . we are still accountable for our choices. We are told to choose between two things. Salvation. life, repentance and a new nature in Christ, His nature . . . . freely offered . . . . or sin and death. . . . a given.
Jesus said. . . . "You refuse to come to me to have life" . . . . . . that is a self-willed choice. . . . . because when we refuse, for whatever reason, we are opting to hang onto our own nature. Whether we decide it is not so bad. . . . or we can't believe Him. . . . or Paul is a conman. . . . . whatever the reason . . . . we are choosing to remain with the nature we have. . . . . . and according to scripture and a good look around. . . . we are all sinners.
I believe that when you start breaking it down. . . . our freewill is limited to our nature.
Interesting point. I'll have to think about that.
Incidentally (and off-topic) I'm listening to a segment of a CFFM class called "Being About Our Father's Business" where they say that God designed us in such a way that "we would search for a reason for the creation and find Him." I don't think I agree with that. Many people choose not to wonder about things.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
73
31
47
76
Popular Days
Feb 3
25
Feb 21
21
Jul 16
21
May 15
21
Top Posters In This Topic
Raf 73 posts
geisha779 31 posts
waysider 47 posts
TLC 76 posts
Popular Days
Feb 3 2010
25 posts
Feb 21 2010
21 posts
Jul 16 2018
21 posts
May 15 2019
21 posts
Popular Posts
Sunesis
Well, we do have over 30,000 Christian denominations, so I don't think you're going to see all Christians agreeing. I imagine that's why it is more important to God that we keep the unity of the Spir
Broken Arrow
I think I get what you're trying to do here as far as getting people to think through something that may have simply been accepted blindly. I'm not going to offer a lengthy defense as to the authenti
Raf
First, to DWBH, please, let's keep it about content and not about people. And in that vein...I for one don't care one whit about what TLCÂ might see or think on the matter. I only care about the actual
Posted Images
Ham
anything would be better than several hundred morning glory seeds..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
You'd have to "be there" gastrointestinaly.. to appreciate the last statement..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
irisheyes
In case you haven't noticed, you are talking to YOURSELF.
Will be cruising the Caribbean for a week, probably not doing much on the net. See ya'll after, if we don't hit a sunami or if it doesn't hit us????
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
Better than not talking to anybody at all..
well, you proved me wrong. Somebody is reading my drivel..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
roberterasmus
Mr. (or Mrs?) Miller,
Thanks for the link. I've wanted to write to Mr. Anderson for some time. He's a guy that has an interesting, introspective style in that book. It's an interesting "take" on Paul and James.
RE
Link to comment
Share on other sites
soul searcher
Another question about Paul...
In Galatians 1:15 (NIV) he writes that God, "set me apart from birth and called me by his grace."
Huh?
I thought his conversion came about in Acts 9:1 when he was on the road to Damascus to persecute more of God's disciples "who belonged to the Way" (no pun intended, that's verbatim from verse 2 in the NIV).
If Paul was destined from birth to be an apostle of Jesus Christ then why did God allow him to stand by and approve the stoning of Stephen, one of God's disciples, "guarding the clothes of those who were killing him." (Acts 22:20)?
How did Paul arrive at the conclusion that he was chosen from birth? I can't find anywhere in scripture where the Lord ever told him that.
(One could argue that his conversion was a "new birth", but the trouble with that argument is that the term "from birth" here means "from my mother's womb".)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
soul searcher
The Way was very big on teaching "predestination".
You will find a good deal about it in Ephesians, which is in (surprise, surprise)-----the epistles.
"Thus Saith Paul."
Link to comment
Share on other sites
soul searcher
Okay, so I went back to Ephesians and in chapter 1 Paul says that God "blessed us in the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in Christ." (verse 3, NIV). He "chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love he predestined us to be adopted as his sons through Jesus Christ."(4-5). And then "11In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will..."
I'm confused about the use of the lower case male personal pronouns above. Is Paul saying that Jesus (not God) predestined all of them to be adopted as his disciples "before the creation of the world"? Did Jesus prophesy somewhere about Paul's birth?
The general concept of "predestination" is very troubling to me, and highly questionable. Does predestination mean that something is planned or that something will definitely happen? If we are creatures of free will, and if God does not control our thoughts and actions, then any of us, intentionally or not, are theoretically capable of messing His plans. Of what significance is it to say that something is predestined if any fool can "unpredestine" it?
I think that as far the New Testament goes, the birth of Jesus was obviously predestined -- and foretold. Who else? Well, Luke said that the birth of John the Baptist was foretold (Luke 1:13), but so far I don't remember anybody but Paul claiming that Paul's birth was foretold. Either Paul's birth was predestined and nobody "foretold" anybody, or Paul is making an unsubstantiated claim.
Maybe somebody can clear this up for me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Link to comment
Share on other sites
soul searcher
Thanks, waysider. That was a very interesting discussion. My mind started to go in all directions, but a few ideas are taking shape...call these my working hypotheses:
1. I don't think God has foreknowledge of all events. To say He does negates the concept of free will. Didn't God get angry at Israel on various occasions for disobeying His will? So I'm thinking...if I knew with 100% certainty that something was going to happen, why wouldn't I spare myself the hassle of getting angry about it when it actually does? God couldn't have known that Israel would disobey Him or He could have spared Himself the trouble of having to punish them.
2. Anyone can say that anything was pre-destined. And it's difficult to refute such claims, isn't it?
3. So far, I see no evidence in scripture that Paul was "predestined" to be called as an apostle of Jesus, apart from his own assertion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
waysider
Yep
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
This calls whole venues of divinity into question..
There are a few opinions I've read here and there...
Part of "God" had to die, giving birth to creation.. some think that the Almighty sacrificed (sound familiar?) part of Himself for the "greater Good".. that could be..
but God can't die. Where did his "parts" go?
He had everything.. at the beginning..
but it is rather "boring". I mean.. the 20 millionth year, with perfect weather..
I think the Almighty chose to reserve 50 percent of Divinity..
and maybe that's what is "free will"..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
and.. its for lack of better words, a Mexican Standoff.
We can't exactly veto Him out of existence.. yet He can't arbitrarily run *us* (Himself) off the map either..
Or was that the other way around..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
geisha779
Well, I can think of once when God stepped into time. . . . but, . . . God is eternal and not limited to same concept of time we are constrained by. . . .
Where do the scriptures say we have freewill? I thought they said our nature was as the children of wrath and our choices dictated by whatever THAT heart felt. . . . is that true free will?
Bet freewill turns out to be somewhat paradoxical . .
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
I think we are saying the same thing in a slightly different dialect..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
geisha779
Would not surprise me in the least.. . .:)
I will say that I don't think God ever gets bored. Although it may sound funny to us. . . He takes great pleasure in His perfection. . . . over flowing joy in Himself. . . I believe so anyway.
My thought is we were created out of this joy and pleasure . . . to share in it. . . .and we are complete in it.
Thus saith Geisha . . .
Link to comment
Share on other sites
soul searcher
Don't we? Everyday we make choices. And we have the freedom to sin or not sin as we please.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JeffSjo
In secular terms we are all conditioned by our environment AND we decided for ourselves what to do about it. Bad choices lead to bad consequences and good choices to good, if life were always fair, which it is not.
Paul's words seem to include BOTH personal responsibility AND acknowledging that we are simply putty in God's hands.
Secular or scriptural I find both perspectives to be valuable considerations.
In a coversation of "nature vs. nurture" I find my answer to be of necessity, "BOTH" and after the first time I figured out that "both" works for me I thought to myself, "duh."
But most theological wrangling on how the specifics of these two perspectives work out in real life seems to me to lead to not much conversation that actually does much real good for anybody.
The self assessed "predestined" inheriters of righteousness often become elitist.
The ones who believe EVERYTHING in life is the result of personal choice can become pitiless bastards.
A consideration of both, for me at least, seems to lead to a balanced perspective.
Edited by JeffSjoLink to comment
Share on other sites
geisha779
I believe that when you start breaking it down. . . . our freewill is limited to our nature. Sure, we can choose to sin, but can we really choose to be righteous? We can try to be righteous on our own, but, we even have a term for that in our vernacular . . . . it is called being self-righteous. :) Bit of a pejorative . . . right? For a good reason to. . . . we all sin, it is our nature. No one is truly righteous on their own.
Self-willed might be a more apt description than free-will. The power to choose the lesser of two evils isn't really free-will is it? And opting to choose neither is still a self-willed choice.
According scripture. . . . we are still accountable for our choices. We are told to choose between two things. Salvation. life, repentance and a new nature in Christ, His nature . . . . freely offered . . . . or sin and death. . . . a given.
Jesus said. . . . "You refuse to come to me to have life" . . . . . . that is a self-willed choice. . . . . because when we refuse, for whatever reason, we are opting to hang onto our own nature. Whether we decide it is not so bad. . . . or we can't believe Him. . . . or Paul is a conman. . . . . whatever the reason . . . . we are choosing to remain with the nature we have. . . . . . and according to scripture and a good look around. . . . we are all sinners.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
soul searcher
Interesting point. I'll have to think about that.
Incidentally (and off-topic) I'm listening to a segment of a CFFM class called "Being About Our Father's Business" where they say that God designed us in such a way that "we would search for a reason for the creation and find Him." I don't think I agree with that. Many people choose not to wonder about things.
Edited by soul searcherLink to comment
Share on other sites
Ham
That sounds like a rewording of an old way belief: "God designed our brain to hold da word"..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frank123lol
We are the result of our culture,raising,community,social lives,Are we God hungry?
Only because we were raised to believe that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gen-2
Okay, OK,.... everything Paul said was God's inerrant word,... especially in the original King James English. >snicker<
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tzaia
Obviously, if you're not God-hungry, then something is wrong with you. Very subtle.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.